Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF AUCTIONEERS
Respondent: JERRY H. FELDMAN
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: West Palm Beach, Florida
Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, March 30, 2007.
Latest Update: Dec. 24, 2024
Feb 14 200? 15:42
g@2/ld/2ae7 16:39 8584146749 DEPR OGA PAGE @3/a9
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
BOARD OF AUCTIONEERS
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Petitioner,
Vv. Case No. 2006-002277
JERRY H. FELDMAN,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
(“Petitioner”), filés this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Auctioneers (“Board”)
against JERRY H. FELDMAN (“Respondent”), and alleges:
. 1. Petitionet is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of auction
businesses and auctioneers, pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and
468, Part VI, Florida Statutes.
2. At all times material hereto, Respondent was licensed in the State of Florida as an
Auctioneer, having been issued license number AU 3094.
3. Respondent's address of record with Petitioner is 1071 Lakeshore Drive, Jupiter,
Florida 33458.
4, On December 7, 2005, Susie Orchard (“Orchard”) and Jerry H. Feldman
(“Respondent”) of Feldman Enterprises, LLC, d/b/a Auction Centre of Jupiter, Florida, entered
into a consignment contract to auction Orchard’s furniture at an absolute auction. The terms of
Feb 14 2007 15:43
g@2/ld/2ae7 16:39 8584146749 DEPR OGA PAGE @4/ag
the consignment agreement allowed for sixty (60) percent to be paid to Orchard and a forty (40)
percent cominission fee to be paid to Respondent.
5. Susie Orchard stated that Respondent conducted an auction on the first Saturday
after she signed the contract and that several items sold for a total of four hundred ninety seven
dollars and fifty cents ($497.50). Orchard’s sixty (60) percent commission amounted to two
hundred ninety eight dollars and fifty cents ($298.50). Orchard stated that on December 14,
2005, the first Wednesday after the auction, she and her husband, along with a trick from
Habitat from Humanity, went to Respondent’s warehouse to pick up Orchard’s unsold
merchandise. Orchard stated that Respondent told her he wanted to hold a second auction the
following Saturday but that she refused to agree to the additional auction. Orchard stated that
Respondent refused to release her merchandise and that the Habitat for Humanity truck left the
warehouse. Orchard stated that she contacted the police and when the police arrived, Respondent
refused to allow Orchard to recover her unsold merchandise without charging ber a storage fee in
addition to his forty (40) percent commission: The storage fee was in the amount of two hundred
ninety eight dollars and fifty cents ($298.50), which was the same amount of Orchard’s
commission on the merchandise that was sold at auction. Orchard stated that before Respondent
allowed her to take her unsold merchandise, Respondent made her sign over her commission
check to him for the storage fee. Orchard stated that she signed over the check under duress in
order to pick up her unsold merchandise. In addition, Respondent stated that she and her husband
had to rent a U-Haul truck in the amount of twenty nine dollars and sixty nine cents ($29.69) to
remove her unsold merchandise from Respondent’s warehouse. Respondent stated. that she did
not receive any money for the sale of her merchandise and that the Respondent owes her
Feb 14 2007 15:43
2/14/2087 15:39 8584146749 DEPR OGA PAGE 85/89
commission in the amount of two hundred ninety eight dollars and fifty cents ($298.50), plus
twenty nine dollars and sixty nine cents ($29.57) for the cost of the U-Haul truck.
6. Respondent provided a written response to the allegations in which he wrote the
following: “Mrs. Orchard belongings were picked up on 12/7/05, from two separate locations for
auctions starting on 12/10/05. I explained to Mrs. Orchard, as I do with all my consignors, that if
an item does not sell or is passed, I would rum the items the following sale. | always allow two
weeks. After that time, if there are any items that are not sold I will allow at the consignors
choice to pick up or donate the no-sale items. When Mrs, Orchard first spoke with me she
requested that I take a reserve on several items. I explained to her that I do not work with
reserves and if] consign an item/items I will sell it at market value to the highest bidder. I do use
discretion and I try to accommodate all my consignors. When possible I will open with a
minimum bid which I feel my consignor will be happy with, Ifno bids J pass that item and try it
the following week, as I explained to Mrs. Orchard, This ‘keeps'within the 30 days allowance of
Chapter 468.389(1}(c). Please note, the Consignment Control form which Mrs. Orchard si ened
states, ‘I commission you to sell the items listed above and on the attached sheet to the highest
bidder by public auction...’ I could have sold her item/items with a lower opening bid. I chose
not to, I did this out of professional courtesy and to keep my consignor happy. Many, many times
when the item is ran the following week it brings a ‘fair’ amount. Also, there were no other
charges other than my 40% Commission on the Consignment Contro] form nor were there any
clause stating that no-sale items were to be picked up by the consignor. My responsibility is to
sel] the items and pay the consignor within 30 days. Mrs. Orchard was in the audience the night
of December 10, 2005. She was not happy with the prices her items were bringing, owner’s
remorse. She sent the Auction Centre an email on Sunday, December 11%, Yes, Mrs. Orchard
Feb 14 2007 15:43
g@2/ld/2ae7 16:39 8584146749 DEPR OGA PAGE 86/a9
contacted me on Monday, December 12 and yes I did not allow her to pick up her no-sale
items. I explained again to her the procedure I discussed with her when I first spoke to her.” In
addition, Respondent wrote “Final agreement, I would allow Mrs. Orchard to pick-up consigned
items if she paid a pick-up and handling fee. She agreed with the Jupiter Police as a witness and
signed over her settlement fees to the Auction Centre.”
7. Section 468.389(1)(c}, Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part:
Failure to account for or to pay or return, within a reasonable time not to
exceed 30 days, money or property belonging to another which has come
into the control of an auctioneer or auction business through an auction
shall be grounds for the disciplinary activities provided in subsections (2)
and (3).
8. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 463,389(1)(c), Florida
Statutes, by failing to return Susie Orchard’s unsold merchandise within a reasonable time.
WHEREFORE, Pétitionet respectfully requests the Board enter an order imposing one or
more of the following penditiA® Yevocation or suspension of Respondent's license, imposition of
an administrative fine not'to"exééed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for each count or separate
offense, issuance of a reprimand, placement of Respondent on probation, restriction of
Respondent’s authorized scope of practice, assessment of costs associated with investigation and
prosecution, imposition of any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2), Flonda
Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 455
and/ot 468, Part VI, Flotida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder.
L E D ~—. pene 24 day of MAPA 2006.
Department c Busin
ess and Professions} Re
AGENCY CLERK ail
vena hes
CLERK Ss ow £. :
ome See G ,
Feb 14 2007 15:43
g@2/ld/2ae7 16:39 8584146749 DEPR OGA PAGE @7/ag
Jessica Leigh
Assistant General Counsel
By Delegation of the Secretary
Counsel for the Department:
Jessica Leigh
Assistant General Counsel
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
1940 North Monroe Street
Florida Bar No. 0011979
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2202
Telephone: (850) 488-0062
Facsimile: (850) 414-6749
TLimlv
Case No. 2006-002277
PQ Gf 3-24. %
Docket for Case No: 07-000785PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Mar. 30, 2007 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Mar. 29, 2007 |
Joint Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Mar. 22, 2007 |
Petitioner`s Witness List filed.
|
Mar. 22, 2007 |
Petitioner`s Exhibit List filed.
|
Mar. 05, 2007 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Mar. 05, 2007 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for April 12, 2007; 9:00 a.m.; West Palm Beach and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Feb. 20, 2007 |
Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions filed.
|
Feb. 20, 2007 |
Petitioner`s First Request for Interrogatories filed.
|
Feb. 20, 2007 |
Petitioner`s First Request for Production of Documents filed.
|
Feb. 20, 2007 |
Notice of Serving Discovery on Respondent filed.
|
Feb. 19, 2007 |
Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Feb. 15, 2007 |
Initial Order.
|
Feb. 14, 2007 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Feb. 14, 2007 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Feb. 14, 2007 |
Agency referral filed.
|