Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: JERALD BRENT KIRKPATRICK
Judges: STUART M. LERNER
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Lauderdale Lakes, Florida
Filed: Dec. 14, 2007
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, February 28, 2008.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA ;
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESIONAL REGULATION
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD ("of y,
DIVISION I . NEES
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND Ol . SUT P (_
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
fot
Petitioner,
vs. Case No. 2006-020177
2006-020099
JERALD BRENT KIRKPATRICK,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
("Petitioner") files this Administrative Complaint against JERALD BRENT -KIRKPATRICK
("Respondent") and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of contracting
pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent has been at all times material hereto, a Certified Building Contractor
in the State of Florida, having been issued license number CB C025094.
3. Respondent’s addresses of record are 1601 Freeman Avenue, Lehigh Acres,
Florida 33972, 1601 Truman Avenue, Lehigh Acres, Florida 33972, and 13410 McGregor Blvd.,
Fort Myers, Florida 33919.
4. Respondent is the licensed qualifying agent for Brenco Construction, Inc.
(hereinafter “Brenco”).
7 9
5. At all times material hereto, Brenco did not possess a certificate of authority as
required by Section 489.119(2), Florida Statutes.
FACTS RELATED TO CASE NO. 2006-020177
6. On or about August 3, 2004, Respondent, doing business as Brenco, entered into a
contract with Yvonne and Stanley Hyndman (hereinafter “Hyndman’”) to construct a home for -
Hyndman located at 1510 Michael Avenue, Lehigh Acres, Florida.
7. The contract price for the aforementioned project was $149,800.00.
8. The contract did not contain the Respondent’s license number.
9. On or about August 7, 2004, Hyndman paid Respondent a deposit of
approximately $1,000.00
10. Onor about November 15, 2005, Respondent informed Hyndman that the prices
stated in the contract had increased significantly and offered another home for $209,900.00.
11. On or about November 15, 2005, Hyndman executed a request for refund of the
$1,000.00 deposit.
12. Respondent was not entitled under the terms of the contract to retain any money
he received from Hyndman above the amount completed on the contract.
13. To date, Respondent has failed to return any money to Hyndman which
Respondent received above the amount completed on the contract.
COUNT I
14. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and six through thirteen as though fully set forth herein.
15. Section 489.119(2), Florida Statutes, provides in part that if an applicant proposes
to engage in contract as a business organization, including any partnership, corporation, business
m) -)
trust, or other legal entity, or in any name other than the applicant’s legal name, the business
organization must apply for a certificate of authority through a qualifying agent and under the
fictitious name, if any.
16. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 489,129(1)(i), Florida
Statutes, by failing in any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or violating
a tule or lawful order of the board, by having violated Section 489.119(2), Florida Statutes.
COUNT It
17. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
five and six through thirteen as though fully set forth herein.
18. Section 489.119(6)(b), Florida Statutes, provides that the registration or
certification number of each contractor shall appear in each offer of services, business proposal,
bid, contract, or advertisement, regardless of medium, as defined by board rule, used by that
contractor in the practice of contracting.
19. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 489.1 29(1)(i), Florida
Statutes, by failing in any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or violating
a rule or lawful order of the bard, by having violated Section 489.119(6)(b), Florida Statutes.
COUNT J
20. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
five and six through thirteen as though fully set forth herein.
21. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 489. 129(1)(g)2, Florida
Statutes, by committing mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of contracting that causes
financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or misconduct occurs when the
contractor has abandoned a customer’s job and the percentage of completion is less than the
percentage of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the time of abandonment, unless
the contractor is entitled to retain such funds under the terms of the contract or refunds the excess
funds within thirty (30) days after the date the job is abandoned.
COUNT IV
22. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and six through thirteen as though fully set forth herein.
23. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(m), Florida
Statutes, by committing incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting.
FACTS RELATED TO CASE NO. 2006-020099
24. On or about August 2, 2004, Respondent, doing business as Brenco, entered into a
contract with Dennis and Monica Wynter (hereinafter “Wynter”) to construct a home for Wynter
located at 1107 Colonial Street East, Lehigh Acres, Florida.
25. The contract price for the aforementioned project was $159,800.00.
26. The contract did not contain the Respondent’s license number.
27. Onor about August 11, 2004, Wynter paid Respondent a deposit of
approximately $1,000.00
28. On or about January 10, 2006, Wynter executed a request for refund of the
$1,000.00 deposit.
29. Respondent was not entitled under the terms of the contract to retain any money
he received from Wynter above the amount completed on the contract.
30. To date, Respondent has failed to retum any money to Wynter which Respondent
received above the amount completed on the contract.
~) re
COUNT V
31. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and twenty-four through thirty as though fully set forth herein.
32. Section 489.119(2), Florida Statutes, provides in part that if an applicant proposes
to engage in contract as a business organization, including any partnership, corporation, business
trust, or other legal entity, or in any name other than the applicant’s legal name, the business
organization must apply for a certificate of authority through a qualifying agent and under the
fictitious name, if any.
33. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(i), Florida
Statutes, by failing in any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or violating
a rule or lawful order of the board, by having violated Section 489.119(2), Florida Statutes.
COUNT VI
34, Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
five and twenty-four through thirty as though fully set forth herein.
35. Section 489.119(6)(b), Florida Statutes, provides that the registration or
certification number of each contractor shall appear in each offer of services, business proposal,
bid, contract, or advertisement, regardless of medium, as defined by board rule, used by that
contractor in the practice of contracting.
36. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(i), Florida
Statutes, by failing in any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or violating
a rule or lawful order of the bard, by having violated Section 489.119(6)(b), Florida Statutes.
COUNT VII
37. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
at
five and twenty-four through thirty as though fully set forth herein.
38. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(g)2, Florida
Statutes, by committing mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of contracting that causes
financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or misconduct occurs when the
contractor has abandoned a customer’s job and the percentage of completion is less than the
percentage of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the time of abandonment, unless
the contractor is entitled to retain such funds under the terms of the contract or refunds the excess
funds within thirty (30) days after the date the job is abandoned.
COUNT Vit
39, Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and twenty-four through thirty as though fully set forth herein.
40. Based’on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(m), Florida
Statutes, by committing incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Construction Industry Licensing
Board enter an Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: place on probation,
reprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or renewal of the certificate of
registration, require financial restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to
exceed $5,000.00 per violation, require continuing education, assess costs associated with the
investigation and prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2),
Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to Chapter
455 and 489, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated thereunder.
1, 2 )
Signed this 2 — day of Sept amty2 __, 2006
Gan C*
Patrick an
Chief Construction Attorney
COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT:
Department of Business and F |
Professional Regulation : 4 Professional Regulation
ess an
Office of the General Counsel Department of mRGENCY CLERK
1940 N. Monroe Street, Ste. 42
Tallahassee, FL 32399-220
2006-02017 | Wad on
2006-02009 CLERK Sead A er
Ys | ee
PG Found: September 26, 2006
Division |: Chung & Cox
Docket for Case No: 07-005679PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Feb. 28, 2008 |
Order Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
|
Feb. 28, 2008 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Held. |
Feb. 21, 2008 |
Letter to Judge Sartin from S. Smothers enclosing Petitioner`s Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
|
Feb. 20, 2008 |
Petitioner`s Witness List filed.
|
Jan. 17, 2008 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for February 28, 2008; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Jan. 08, 2008 |
Petitioner`s First Request for Production to Respondent filed.
|
Jan. 08, 2008 |
Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions to Respondent filed.
|
Jan. 04, 2008 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Continue Hearing filed.
|
Jan. 02, 2008 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Jan. 02, 2008 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for February 21, 2008; 9:30 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Dec. 21, 2007 |
Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
|
Dec. 20, 2007 |
Unilateral Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Dec. 14, 2007 |
Initial Order.
|
Dec. 14, 2007 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Dec. 14, 2007 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Dec. 14, 2007 |
Referral Letters (2) filed.
|