Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: GUILLERMO LUIS MCCAUSLAND
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Lauderdale Lakes, Florida
Filed: Dec. 20, 2007
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, February 22, 2008.
Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
Dec 20 2007 14:23
12/26/2887 14:28 4874258268 WRIGHT FULFORD MOORH PAGE @7/15
oa : os
Ms
1
a
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
DIVISION It
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND —
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Petitioner,
v5. Case Nos. 2005-044498
2005-054411
GUILLERMO LUIS MCCAUSLAND,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS ANT) PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint before the Construction Industry Licensing
Board, against GUILLERMO LUIS MCCAUSLAND, ("Respondent"), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of contracting
pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent is, and has been at all times material hereto, a Certified Roofing
Contractor, in the State of Florida, having been issued license number CC C056363.
3. Respondent's address of record is 1059 NE 104” Street, Miami Shores, Florida
33138. |
4, At all times material hereto, Respondent was licensed as the qualifying agent for
Vinson - Harlot Roofing, Inc., a Florida corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor") with
no certificate of authority as a qualified business organization (QB license).
5. Section 489,1195(1)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that all primary qualifying
Dec 20 2007 14:24
12/26/2887 14:28 4874258268 WRIGHT FULFORD MOORH PAGE 8/15
tn, —
‘ 1 oy
lo
agents for a business organization are jointly and equally respousible for supervision of ail
operations of the business organization; for all field work at all sites; and for financial matters,
both for the organization in general and for each specific job.
COUNT I
6. _ Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five as though fully set forth in this Count I.
7, The Contractor failed to obtain a QB license as required by Section 489.119(2),
Florida Statutes.
8. Section 489, 119(2), Florida Statutes, provides: ifthe applicant proposes to engage
in contracting as a business organization, including any partnership, corporation, business trust, or
other legal entity, or in any name other than the applicant’s legal name or a fictitious name where
the applicant is doing business as a sole proprietorship, the business organization must apply for a
certificate of authority through a qualifying agent and under the fictitious name, if any.
9. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(i), Florida
Statutes (2004), by failing in any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a Tule or lawful order of the buard.
Case Number 2005-044492
10. On or about April 21, 2005 the Contractor, using the name V.H. Roofing, entered
into a written contract with Wendy Moise (hereinafter referred to as “Moise”) to re-roof Moise’s
residence located at 334 NW 108° Terrace, Miami, Florida.
11. The contract price was Six Thousand Three Hundred dollars ($6,300.00).
12. From about April 21, 2005 to May 4, 2005 Moise made three (3) payments to the
Dec 20 2007 14:24
12/26/2887 14:28 4874258268 WRIGHT FULFORD MOORH PAGE 89/15
‘
~ -
|
Contractor totaling Two Thousand Five Hundred dollars ($2,500.00).
13. The Contractor applied to the Miami-Dade County building department for a
building permit for the project. The application was approved and on or about May 6, 2005
building, permit number 2005069837 was issued,
14. The Contractor perfoxmed or attempted to perform, but failed to complete, the
work called for by the contract. On May 18, 2005 the Miami-Dade County building department
notified the Contractor that the Contractor’s work failed a “before anchor sheet is covered”
inspection conducted that day. Among other matters, the building department required the
submission of shop drawings for some structural beams that were replaced. After May 18, 2005,
the Contractor failed to submit the shop drawings, failed to obtain a passing “before anchor sheet
is covered” inspection, and, without just cause and notice to Moise, the Contractor failed to
perform further work, thereby abandoning the project.
15. After the Contractor abandoned the project, Moise had the project completed by
another contractor at a total cost that substantially exceeded the original contract price. On or
about February 18, 2006 the completed project earned a passing final inspection from the Miami-
Dade County building department.
COUNT TH
16. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and ten through fifteen as though fully set forth in this Count IL
17. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)@), Florida
Statutes (2004), by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contractor
Dec 20 2007 14:24
12/26/2887 14:28 4874258268 WRIGHT FULFORD MOORH PAGE 18/15
oan, sy
\
terminates the project without just cause or without proper notification to the owner, inchiding
the reason for termination, or fails to perform work without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
COUNT DY
18. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and ten through fifteen as though fully set forth in this Count I.
19. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489. 129(1)(8), Florida
Statutes (2004), by acting in the capacity of a contractor under any certificate or registration
issued hereunder except in the name of the certificateholder or registrant as set forth on the issued
certificate or registration, or in accordance with the personnel of the certificateholder or registrant
as set forth in the application for the certificate or registration, or as later changed as provided in
this part.
COUNT iv
20. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and ten through fifteen as though fully set forth in this Count IV.
21. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(0), Florida
Statutes (2004), by proceeding on any job without obtaining applicable local building department
permits and uispections.
Case Number 2005-054411
22. On or about May 18, 2005 the Contractor, using the name V.H. Roofing, entered
into a written contract with Rubin Vertus (hereafter referred to as “Vertus”) to re-roof'a house
owned by Vertus and located at 1420 NE 157™ Street, North Miami Beach, Florida.
23. The contract price was Eight Thousand Six Hundred dollars ($8,600.00).
Dec 20 2007 14:24
12/26/2887 14:28 4874258268 WRIGHT FULFORD MOORH PAGE 11/15
\
~ -
24. Onor about May 24, 2005 Vertus paid the Contractor a deposit of Four Thousand
dollars ($4,000.00).
25, Onor about July 11, 2005 the Contractor applied to the City of North Miami
Beach building department for a building permit for the project. The application was approved
and on or about July 12, 2005 building permit number BM05-230 was issued
26. Onor about May 28, 2005 the Contractor commenced work on the project by
removing part of the roof. During the Contractor’s re-roofing operations, the Contractor failed to
maintain the roofin watertight condition resulting in rain water intrusion which caused extensive
damage to the interior of the house.
27. After May 2005, and without just cause and notice to Vertus, the Contractor failed
to perform any further work, thereby abandoning the project.
28. After the Contractor abandoned the project, Vertus had the project completed by
others at a total cost that substantially exceeded the original contract price.
COUNTY"
29. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and twenty two through twenty eight as though fully set forth in this Count V.
30. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489. 129(1)(H, Florida
Statutes (2004), by acting in the capacity of a contractor under any certificate or registration
issued hereunder except in the name of the certificateholder or registrant as set forth on the issued
certificate or registration, or in accordance with the personnel of the certificateholder or registrant
as set forth in the application for the certificate or registration, or as later changed as provided in
this part.
Dec 20 2007 14:25
12/26/2887 14:28 4874258268 WRIGHT FULFORD MOORH PAGE
a 5
co VI
31. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and twenty two through twenty cight as though fully set forth in this Count VI.
32. Section 489.126(2)(a), Florida Statutes, states: “A contractor who receives, as
initial payment, money totaling more than 10 percent of the contract price for repair, restoration,
improvement, or construction to residential réal property must apply for permits necessary to do
work within 30 days after the date payment is made, except where the work does not require a
permit under the applicable codes and ordinances.”
33. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489_129(1)(), Florida
Statutes (2004), by failing in any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT Vil
34. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and twenty two through twenty eight as though fully set forth in this Count VIL.
35. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489,129(1)G), Florida
Statutes (2004), by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contractor
terminates the project without just cause or without proper notification to the owner, including
the reason for termination, or fails to perform work without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
co VUE
36, Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and twenty two through twenty eight as though fully set forth in this Count VII.
12/15
Dec 20 2007 14:25
12/26/2887 14:28 4874258268 WRIGHT FULFORD MOORH PAGE 13/15
37. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1 )(m),
Florida Statutes (2004), by committing incompetency or misconduct in the practice of
contracting.
WIILREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Construction Industry Licensing
Board enter an Order imposing one or more of the following penalties; place on probation,
reprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or renewal of the certificate or
registration, require financial restitution to 4 ‘consumer, impose an administrative fine not to
exceed $5,000 per violation, require continuing education, assess cosis associated with
investigation and prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2),
Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to
Chapters 489, 455, Florida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder.
Signed this_¢: wd. day of 2007,
PC Found: February 27, 2007 / Loins. fe. .
Diy, I: Flaherty & Weller THEODORE R. GAY Gag
ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL
COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT:
Theodore R, Gay F | [ E D
Assistant General Counsel Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Department of Business and AGENCY CLERK
Professional Regulation
8685 NW 53” Terrace, #100
Miami, FL 33166
(305) 470-6783 Ext. 2225 curK Soap Ae Warton
cate 37 Al- 2OOT
TRG/sb
Cage #2005-044498, 2005-054411
Docket for Case No: 07-005756PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Feb. 22, 2008 |
Order Granting Motion to Relinquish, Canceling Hearing, and Closing File.
|
Feb. 06, 2008 |
Order to Show Cause Why Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction should Not be Granted.
|
Feb. 05, 2008 |
Motion to Compel Discovery, Taxing Attorney`s Fees and Costs filed.
|
Feb. 05, 2008 |
Petitioner`s Motion for Summary Final Order, or in the Alternative Petitioner`s Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Jan. 03, 2008 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Jan. 03, 2008 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for February 29, 2008; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Dec. 27, 2007 |
Notice of Service of Interrogatories filed.
|
Dec. 27, 2007 |
Petitioner`s First Request for Production to Respondent filed.
|
Dec. 27, 2007 |
Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions to Respondent filed.
|
Dec. 27, 2007 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Dec. 21, 2007 |
Initial Order.
|
Dec. 20, 2007 |
Request for Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Dec. 20, 2007 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Dec. 20, 2007 |
Referral Letter filed.
|