ion OS 0% ¥ PX 40%, Cay Ye STATE OF FLORIDA C48 bg k DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION % CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BO DIVISION I : DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Petitioner, Case No. 2007-005651 v. PAUL HANSEN, Respondent. / ' ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL . REGULATION, ("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint before the Construction Industry Licensing Board, against PAUL HANSEN, ("Respondent"), and says: 1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of contracting pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes. 2. Respondent is, and has been at all times material hereto, a Certified Residential Contractor in the State of Florida, having been issued licensé number CRC 56902. 3. Respondent's last known addresses of record are 1424-2 SE 17" Avenue, Cape Coral, FL 33990; P. O. Box 151735, Cape Coral, FL 33915-1735; and, 1436 SE 16" Place, Cape Coral, FL 33909. 4. At all times material hereto, Respondent was the primary qualifying agent for Hansen Homes of South Florida, Inc. ("HHSF"), which has a certificate of authority, QB 13128. i 5. Section 48 — 95(1)(a), Florida Statutes, provides th. .II primary qualifying agents fora business organization are jointly and equally responsible for supervision of all operations of the business organization; for all field work at all sites; and for financial matters, both for the organization in general and for each specific job. 6. On or about March 24, 2005, HHSF entered into a contract with Diane Wolsing (“Wolsing") to build a home on the property located at 1004 SW 18" Street, Cape Coral, FL 33993. 7. The total contract price was $213,775.00, of which $21,377.50 was paid to HHSF on or about May 9, 2005. 8. Respondent applied for a permit on July 29, 2005. The permit was approved on or about August 19, 2005. 9. Neither Respondent nor anyone on behalf of HHSF paid the permit fees to date or picked up the permit upon approval. 10. The permit expired on or before December 7, 2006. 11. Respondent re-applied for the permit on or about December 7, 2006. The permit was approved a second time on or about January 10, 2007. , 12. Neither Respondent nor anyone on behalf of HHSF paid the permit fees to date or picked up the permit upon approval. 13. Neither Respondent nor HHSF performed any work from the date the permit was first approved on or about August 19, 2005 until the new application was submitted for the permit on or about December 7, 2006. 14, Neither Respondent nor HHSF paid the permit application fees as would be required to be able to have the permit issued on January 10, 2007. 15. Neither Respondent nor HHSF picked up the permit or completed any work from the date the permit was approved on or about January 10, 2007 through May 4, 2007. 2 16. Financinga _ funding for the construction loan rem. ed in place for a period that covered in excess of ninety (90) days between August 19, 2005 and December 7, 2006. 17. There is at least one ninety (90) day period between August 19, 2005 and December 7, 2006, in which Respondent did no work and did not have just cause for failing to complete any work during each said ninety (90) day period. 18. There has been at least ninety (90) days from the date the permit was approved on or about January 10, 2007 to May 4, 2007, in which Respondent and/or HHSF did not complete any work. 19. There was no just cause for Respondent to fail to complete any work from January 10, 2007 to May 4, 2007. 20. At the time of abandonment, the percentage of completion of work by Respondent and/or HHSF is less than the amount of monies received by Respondent and/or HHSF. COUNT I 21. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 20 as though fully set forth herein, 22. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section 489. 129(1)(g)2, Florida Statutes, by committing mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of contracting that causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or misconduct occurs when the contractor has abandoned a customer's job and the percentage of completion is less that than the percentage of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the time of abandonment, unless the contractor is entitled to retain such funds under the terms of the contract or refunds the excess funds within 30 days after the job is abandoned. . COUNT II 23. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 20 as though fully set forth herein. 24. Basedon thc —_regoing, Respondent violated section ).129(1)G), Florida Statutes, by abandoning the construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under ~ contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contractor terminates the project without just cause or without proper notification to the owner, including the reason for termination, or fails to perform work without Just cause for 90 consecutive days. COUNT It 25. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 20 as though fully set forth herein. 26. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(0), Florida Statutes, by proceeding on this job without paying the necessary fees to have the permit issued, failing to obtain the permit once it was approved and failing to obtain any inspections. COUNT IV 27. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 26 as though fully set forth herein. . 28. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section 489.129(1)(m), Florida Statutes, by committing incompetence or mismanagement in the practice of contracting WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Construction Industry Licensing Board enter an Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: place on probation, reprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or renewal of the certificate or registration, require financial restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to exceed $5,000 per violation, require continuing education, assess costs associated with investigation and prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within section 455.227(2), Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 489, 455, Florida _tutes, and/or the rules promulgated th ander. Signed this /0t day of By: 7 Assistant General Counsel , 2007. COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT: ‘ tion ess and professional Regulati Matthew D. Mort i a vac Department of BUGENCY CLERK Assistant General Counsel Department of Business and Professional Regulation Office of the General Counsel wn om 1940 N. Monroe Street, Ste. 42 RK Soa Zé . \W ae oo Tallahassee, FL 32399-2202 ° ~ DATE, PC Found: July 3, 2607 Div. i: Clark & Burke

Docket for Case No: 08-000968PL