Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs KEVIN SULLIVAN, 08-001727PL (2008)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 08-001727PL Visitors: 7
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: KEVIN SULLIVAN
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: West Palm Beach, Florida
Filed: Apr. 09, 2008
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, September 11, 2008.

Latest Update: Jun. 02, 2024
OX- 197 PL 08 APR. Phe 29 STATE OF FLORIDA Ding SP i DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION is Bi Hoe Ray i Ye CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD DIVISION I DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Petitioner, Case No. 2007-032360 Vv. KEVIN SULLIVAN, Respondent. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint before the Construction Industry Licensing Board, against KEVIN SULLIVAN, ("Respondent"), and says: 1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of contracting pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes. 2. _ Respondent is, and has been at all times material hereto, a Certified Residential Contractor in the State of Florida, having been issued license number CR C1326939. 3. Respondent's last known address of record is 8442 S. Federal Highway, Port St. Lucie, FL 34952. 4, At all times material hereto, Respondent was doing business as Sullivan Homes at Hawk’s Ridge, LLC (“SHHR”). SHHR has not been appropriately qualified as required. 5. Section 489.! _3(1){a), Florida Statutes, provides that © primary qualifying agents for a business organization are jointly and equally responsible for supervision of all operations of the business organization; for all field work at all sites; and for financial matters, both for the organization in general and for each specific job. 6. On or about August 26, 2005, SHHR entered into a contract with Michael and Randi Snowden (“Snowden") to purchase a lot and construct a residence on property located in St. Lucie County, Florida. 7. The total contract price was $233,000.00, of which $23,300.00 was paid to SHHR by Snowden. 8. Respondent failed to obtain any permit to complete any work pursuant to the contract with Snowden. 9. Neither SHHR nor Respondent began or completed the contracted work. 10. No amount of monies paid by Snowden to SHHR has been refunded. 11. Asno work was completed by Respondent, the amount of monies received by Respondent was in excess of the amount of work completed by Respondent. COUNT I 12. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 11 as though fully set forth herein. 13. Section 489.119(2), Florida Statutes, requires that a contractor must qualify and obtain a certificate of authority for any company in which the contractor is engaging in contracting. 14. © Sullivan Homes at Hawk’s Ridge, LLC is not a qualified business as required by Section 489.119(2), Florida Statutes and has not obtained the necessary certificate of authority. 15. | Respondent engages in contracting in the name of Sullivan Homes at Hawk’s Ridge, LLC. 16. Basedonthe‘ ‘going, Respondent violated section 4° 129(1)(i), Florida Statutes, by failing in any material respect to comply with the provisions of Chapter 489, Part I, Florida Statutes, or violating a rule or lawful order of the board, by having violated section 489.119(2), Florida Statutes. COUNT II 17. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 11 as though fully set forth herein. | 18. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section 489.129(1)(g)2, Florida Statutes, by committing mismanagement or misconduct in the practice ‘of contracting that causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or misconduct occurs when the contractor has abandoned a customer's job and the percentage of completion is less that than the percentage of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the time of abandonment, unless the contractor is entitled to retain such funds under the terms of the contract or refunds the excess funds within 30 days after the job is abandoned. COUNT II] 19. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 11 as though fully set forth herein. 20. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section 489.129(1)(), Florida Statutes, by abandoning the construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contractor terminates the project without just cause or without proper notification to the owner, including the reason for termination, or fails to perform work without just cause for 90 consecutive days. COUNT IV 21. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 11 as though fully set forth herein. 22. Basedupont’ “oregoing, the Respondent violated Sen 489.129(1)(0), Florida Statutes, by failing to obtain the necessary permits, pass all inspections and finalize the necessary permits. COUNT V 23. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 22 as though fully set forth herein. 24, Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section 489.129(1)(m), Florida Statutes, by committing incompetence or mismanagement in the practice of contracting WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Construction Industry Licensing Board enter an Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: place on probation, reprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or renewal of the certificate or registration, require financial restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to exceed $5,000 per violation, require continuing education, assess costs associated with investigation and prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within section 455.227(2), Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 489, 455, Florida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder. Signed this WA 4 day of Bu C— , 2007. PC Found: December 4, 2007 Div. I: Del Vecchio & Cox By: Matthew D. Morton Assistant General Counsel FILED COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT: . , Department of Business and Professional Regulation DEPUTY Matthew D. Morton . CLERK Assistant General Counsel : M . Department of Business and cuerk 1 otandmn Thishole. Professional Regulation | —_ L).. 2008 Office of the General Counsel DATE 1940 N. Monroe Street, Ste. 42 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2202

Docket for Case No: 08-001727PL
Issue Date Proceedings
Sep. 11, 2008 Order Closing Files. CASE CLOSED.
Sep. 10, 2008 Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
Sep. 10, 2008 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed.
Jun. 18, 2008 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for September 23 through 26, 2008; 9:30 a.m.; West Palm Beach, FL).
Jun. 10, 2008 Petitioner`s Motion to Continue Hearing filed.
Apr. 24, 2008 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Apr. 24, 2008 Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for June 24 through 27, 2008; 9:30 a.m.; West Palm Beach, FL; amended as to dates of hearing and location).
Apr. 24, 2008 Amended Order of Consolidation (DOAH Casa Nos. 08-1157PL, 08-1158PL, 08-1159PL, 08-1726PL, 08-1727PL, 08-1728PL, 08-1729PL, 08-1730PL, 08-1731PL, 08-1732PL, 08-1733PL, 08-1734PL and 08-1735PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed in Case No. 08-1735PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed in Case No. 08-1729PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed in Case No. 08-1734PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed in Case No. 08-1733PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed in Case No. 08-1732PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed in Case No. 08-1732PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed in Case No. 08-1731PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed in Case No. 08-1730PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed in Case No. 08-1729PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed in Case No. 08-1728PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed in Case No. 08-1727PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed in Case No. 08-1726PL).
Apr. 15, 2008 Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 08-1726PL, 08-1727PL, 08-1728PL, 08-1729PL, 08-1730PL, 08-1731PL, 08-1732PL, 08-1733PL, 08-1734PL and 08-1735PL).
Apr. 14, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order filed.
Apr. 09, 2008 Election of Rights filed.
Apr. 09, 2008 Request for Administrative Hearing filed.
Apr. 09, 2008 Administrative Complaint filed.
Apr. 09, 2008 Agency referral filed.
Apr. 09, 2008 Initial Order.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer