Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: RENEE M. PIROLO
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Jul. 07, 2008
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, August 28, 2008.
Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
O¥- 327TPL
STATE OF FLORIDA ;
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
DIVISION I & I
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Case Nos. 2007-004815
Petitioner, 2007-006142
2007-006150
vs, 2007-006323
2007-007671
RENEE M. PIROLO, 2007-008706
2007-008716
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
| Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint before the Construction Industry Licensing
Board, against RENEE M. PIROLO, ("Respondent"), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of contracting
pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455. and 489, Florida Statutes. .
2. Respondent's address of record is 28059 U.S. Highway 19 North, #327,
Clearwater, Florida 33761.
3. Beginning on June 22, 2006, and thereafter at all times material hereto, Florida
corporation Thermogard Plus, Inc. (the “Contractor”) was a qualified business organization,
having been issued certificate of authority number QB48693, and certified general contractor
Ryan Dean Cox Jr., license number CGC1511482, was the Contractor’s primary qualifying agent.
mens
at
4. Beginning on June 22, 2006, and thereafter at all times material hereto, the
Respondent was the Contractor’s Financially Responsible Officer, having been issued license
number FRO2670.
5. Section 489.1195(1)(b), Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part: Upon
approval by the board, a business entity may designate a financially responsible officer for
purposes of certification or registration. A financially responsible officer shall be responsible for
all financial aspects of the business organization and may not be designated as the primary
qualifying agent.
DBPR Case No. 2007-004815
6. On or about April 20, 2006 the Contractor entered into a written agreement with
Phyllis Aragona (hereinafter referred to as “Aragona”) for the installation of hurricane shutters at
Aragona’s residence located at 2751 South Ocean Drive, Apt. 7038, Hollywood, Florida.
7. The contract price was Three Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy dollars
($3,970.00).
8. ; Pursuant to the contract, on or about April 26, 2006 Aragona paid the Contractor
a deposit of One Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety Five dollars ($1,895.00). On or about August
14, 2006 and without authorization, the Contractor charged Aragona’s credit card One Thousand
Eight Hundred Ninety Five dollars ($1,895.00), even though the Contractor had not yet
commenced working on the project.
9. The Contractor failed to commence the project and failed to refund any of the
monies paid by Aragona.
Sd
ew
COUNT I
10. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through nine as though fully set forth in this Count I.
11. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)q), Florida
Statutes (2005), by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contractor
terminates the project without just cause or without proper notification to the owner, including
the reason for termination, or fails to perform work without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
COUNT
12, Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through nine as though fully set forth in this Count IL.
13. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489. 129(1)(g)2.,
Florida Statutes (2005), by committing mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of
contracting that causes financial harm to a customer, Financial mismanagement or misconduct
occurs when the contractor has abandoned a customer’s job and the percentage of completion is
less than the percentage of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the time of
abandonment, unless the contractor is entitled to retain such funds under the terms of the contract
or refunds the excess funds within 30 days after the date the job is abandoned.
DBPR Case No, 2007-006142
14. On or about May 4, 2006, the Contractor entered into a written agreement with
Harvey Krupp (hereinafter referred to as “Krupp”) for the installation of hurricane shutters at
Krupp’s residence located at 6190 N.W. 98th Drive, Parkland, Florida.
3
15. The contract price was Twenty Five Thousand Seventy Five dollars and Eight
cents ($25,075.08).
16. Pursuant to the contract, on or about May 4, 2006 Krupp paid the Contractor a
deposit of Ten Thousand dollars ($10,000.00).
17. The Contractor failed to commence the project and failed to refund any of the
monies paid by Krupp.
COUNT 0
18. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and fourteen through seventeen as though fully set forth in this Count IT.
19. _ Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489, 129(1)(), Florida
Statutes (2005), by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contractor
terminates the project without just cause or without proper notification to the owner, including
the reason for termination, or fails to perform work without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
COUNT IV
20. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and fourteen through seventeen as though fully set forth in this Count IV.
21. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(g)2.,
Florida Statutes (2005), by committing mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of
contracting that causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or misconduct
occurs when the contractor has abandoned a customer’s job and the percentage of completion is
less than the percentage of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the time of
abandonment, unless the contractor is entitled to retain such funds under the terms of the contract
or refunds the excess funds within 30 days after the date the job is abandoned.
DBPR Case No. 2007-006150
22. On or about June 14, 2006, the Contractor entered into a written agreement with
Joseph Levin (hereinafter referred to as “Levin’”) for the installation of hurricane shutters at
Levin’s residence located at 6699 N.W. 66th Way, Parkland, Florida,
23. The contract price was Seven Thousand Twenty Six dollars ($7,026.00).
24. Pursuant to the contract, on or about June 20, 2006 Levin paid the Contractor a
deposit of Three Thousand Five Hundred Thirteen dollars ($3,513.00).
25. The Contractor failed to commence the project and failed to refund any of the
monies paid by Levin.
UNT V
26, Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and twenty two through twenty five as though fully set forth in this Count V.
27. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(), Florida .
Statutes (2005), by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contractor
terminates the project without just cause or without proper notification to the owner, including
the reason for termination, or fails to perform work without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
COUNT VI
28. _ Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and twenty two through twenty five as though fully set forth in this Count VI.
29. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489. 129(1)(g)2.,
Florida Statutes (2005), by committing mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of
contracting that causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or misconduct
occurs when the contractor has abandoned a customer’s job and the percentage of completion is
less than the percentage of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the time of
abandonment, unless the contractor is entitled to retain such funds under the terms of the contract
or refunds the excess funds within 30 days after the date the job is abandoned.
30. | Onor about April 3, 2006, the Contractor entered into a written agreement with
Katia Diehl (hereinafter referred to as “Diehl”) for the installation of hurricane shutters at Diehl’s
residence located at 6903 N.W. 113th Place, Doral, Florida.
31. The contract price was Fourteen Thousand Six Hundred Eighty dollars
($14,680.00).
32. Pursuant to the contract, on or about April 3, 2006 Dieh! paid the Contractor
deposits of Two Thousand Eight Hundred dollars ($2,800.00) and Seven Thousand Three
Hundred dollars ($7,300.00), for a total of Ten Thousand One Hundred dollars ($10,100.00).
33. The Contractor failed to commence the project and failed to refund any of the
monies paid by Diehl.
UNT VIL
34. _ Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and thirty through thirty three as though fully set forth in this Count VII.
35. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(j), Florida
Statutes (2005), by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contractor
terminates the project without just cause or without proper notification to the owner, including
the reason for termination, or fails to perform work without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
COUNT Vili |
36. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and thirty through thirty three as though fully set forth in this Count VII.
37. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(g)2.,
Florida Statutes (2005), by committing mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of
contracting that causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or misconduct.
occurs when the contractor has abandoned a customer’s job and the percentage of completion is
less than the percentage of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the time of
abandonment, unless the contractor is entitled to retain such funds under the terms of the contract
or refunds the excess funds within 30 days after the date the job is abandoned.
DBPR Case No. 2007-007671
38. | Onor about March 30, 2006, the Contractor entered into a written agreement with
Nicholas Papson (hereinafter referred to as “Papson”) for the installation of hurricane shutters at
Papson’s residence located at 2865 Antietam Lane, West Palm Beach, Florida.
» 39, The contract price was Nine Thousand Six Hundred dollars ($9,600.00).
40. Pursuant to the contract, on or about March 30, 2006 Papson paid the Contractor
a deposit of Four Thousand Eight Hundred dollars ($4,800.00).
41. | The Contractor failed to commence the project and failed to refund any of the
monies paid by Papson.
COUNT IX
42. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and thirty eight through forty one as though fully set forth in this Count IX.
43. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)@), Florida
Statutes (2005), by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
‘contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contractor
terminates the project without just cause or without proper notification to the owner, including
the reason for termination, or fails to perform work without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
COUNT X
, 44. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and thirty eight through forty one as though fully set forth in this Count X.
45. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489, 129(1)(g)2.,
Florida Statutes (2005), by committing mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of
contracting that causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or misconduct
occurs when the contractor has abandoned a customer’s job and the percentage of completion is
less than the percentage of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the time of
abandonment, unless the contractor is entitled to retain such funds under the terns of the contract
or refunds the excess funds within 30 days after the date the job is abandoned.
DBPR Case No. 2007-008706
46. Onor about May 1, 2006, the Contractor entered into a written agreement with
Jorge Ortega (hereinafter referred to as “Ortega”) for the installation of hurricane shutters at
Ortega’s residence located at 6767 Collins Avenue, Unit 1009, Miami Beach, Florida.
47. The contract price was Four Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy Three. dollars
($4,773.00).
48. Pursuant to the contract, on or about May 10, 2006 Ortega paid the Contractor a
deposit of Two Thousand Four Hundred dollars ($2,400.00), and on or about May 11, 2006
Ortega Paid the Contractor Two Thousand Four Hundred dollars ($2,400.00), for a total of Four
Thousand Eight Hundred dollars ($4,800.00). |
49. The Contractor failed to commence the project and failed to refund any of the
monies paid by Ortega.
COUNT XI
50. _ Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and forty six through forty nine as though fully set forth in this Count XI.
51. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1){j), Florida
Statutes (2005), by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contractor
terminates the project without just cause or without proper notification to the owner, including
the reason for termination, or fails to perform work without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
COUNT XH
52. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and forty six through forty nine as though fully set forth in this Count XH.
53. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(g)2.,
Florida Statutes (2005), by committing mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of
contracting that causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or misconduct
occurs when the contractor has abandoned a customer’s job and the percentage of completion is
less than the percentage of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the time of |
abandonment, unless the contractor is entitled to retain such funds under the terms of the contract
or refunds the excess funds within 30 days after the date the job is abandoned.
DBPR Case No. 2007-008716
54. Onor about June 15, 2006, the Contractor entered into a written agreement with
Gerardo Gamboa (hereinafter referred to as “Gamboa”) for the installation of hurricane shutters at
Gamboa’s residence located at 11365 N.W. 77th Lane, Doral, Florida.
55. The contract price was Six Thousand Five Hundred Twenty dollars ($6,520.00).
56. Pursuant to the contract, onor about June 20, 2006 Gamboa paid the Contractor a
deposit of Three Thousand Two Hundred Sixty dollars ($3,260.00).
57. The Contractor failed to commence the project and failed to refund any of the
monies paid by Gamboa.
COUNT XT
58. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and fifty four through fifty seven as though fully set forth in this Count XT.
59. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(j), Florida
Statutes (2005), by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contractor
terminates the project without just cause or without proper notification to the owner, including
the reason for termination, or fails to perform work without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
10
COUNT XIV
60. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and fifty four through fifty seven as though fully set forth in this Count XTV.
61. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(g)2.,
Florida Statutes (2005), by committing mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of
contracting that causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or misconduct
occurs when the contractor has abandoned a customer’s job and the percentage of completion is
less than the percentage of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the time of
abandonment, unless the contractor is entitled to retain such funds under the terms of the contract
or refunds the excess funds within 30 days after the date the job is abandoned.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Construction Industry Licensing
Board enter an Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: place on probation,
reprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or renewal of the certificate or
registration, require financial restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fin e not to
exceed $5,000 per violation, require continuing education, assess costs associated with
investigation and prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2),
Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to
Chapters 489, 455, Fi lorida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder.
Signed this Z3e~ day of _Splwibes__. 2007.
&
WT hevwtis.. Te. -
GS. Sy KS
PC Found: September 25, 2007 THEODORE R. GAY
Div I: Stewart & Thornton ASSISTANT GENERAL CO! shy
Div. II: Bailey & Lawson « ee ae
s ser
sr
&
i RS
gt
sete
wees
COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT:
Theodore R. Gay
Assistant General Counsel
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
8240 NW 52nd Terrace, #304
Miami, FL 33166
(305) 470-6783 Ext, 2225
TRG/
Case # 2007-004815, 2007-006142, 2007-0061 50, 2007-006323; 2007-00767 1, 2007-008706, 2007-0087 16
12
Docket for Case No: 08-003277PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Aug. 28, 2008 |
Order Closing Files. CASE CLOSED.
|
Aug. 27, 2008 |
Motion to Cancel Hearing and to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Aug. 14, 2008 |
Order Granting Motion Concerning Testimony by Telephone.
|
Aug. 07, 2008 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for September 23 through 25, 2008; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Aug. 05, 2008 |
Motion to Continue Trial filed.
|
Aug. 05, 2008 |
Petitioner`s Motion Concerning Testimony by Telephone filed.
|
Aug. 04, 2008 |
Notice of Appearance filed.
|
Aug. 04, 2008 |
Respondent`s Unilateral Response to Initial Order and Motion to Consolidate filed.
|
Jul. 29, 2008 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Jul. 29, 2008 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for August 11 through 13, 2008; 9:30 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Jul. 29, 2008 |
Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 08-3277PL, 08-3278PL and 08-3279PL).
|
Jul. 15, 2008 |
Petitioner`s Unilateral Response to Initial Order and Motion to Consolidate filed.
|
Jul. 07, 2008 |
Initial Order.
|
Jul. 07, 2008 |
Answer to Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jul. 07, 2008 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jul. 07, 2008 |
Agency referral filed.
|