STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
LS MOTORSPORTS, LLC, AND | ) | |||
MICHAEL J. KONCZAL, INC., | ) ) | |||
Petitioners, | ) | |||
) | ||||
vs. | ) | Case | No. | 08-3783 |
) | ||||
SEMINOLE SCOOTERS, INC., | ) | |||
) | ||||
Respondent. | ) | |||
) |
RECOMMENDED ORDER
On February 11, 2009, an administrative hearing in this case was held in St. Petersburg, Florida, before William F. Quattlebaum, Administrative Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner LS MotorSports, LLC:
(No appearance)
For Petitioner Michael J. Konczal, Inc:
Michael Konczal, pro se Michael J. Konczal, Inc.
1801 Twenty-Eighth Street, North St. Petersburg, Florida 33715
For Respondent: David Dubin, pro se
Seminole Scooters, Inc. 6227 Park Boulevard
Pinellas Park, Florida 33781
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
The issue in the case is whether an application for a motor vehicle dealer license filed by LS MotorSports, LLC, and
Michael J. Konczal, Inc., should be approved.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
By notice published in the Florida Administrative Weekly (Volume 34, Number 29; July 18, 2008), the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (Department) gave notice that
LS MotorSports, LLC (LS MotorSports), was seeking to establish a new point motor vehicle dealership in St. Petersburg, Florida, with Michael J. Konczal, Inc., for the line-make "Chunfeng Holding Group Co. Ltd.(CFHG)." A challenge to the establishment of the dealership was filed with the Department by an existing motorcycle dealership, Seminole Scooters, Inc. (Respondent).
By letter dated July 31, 2008, the Department forwarded the challenge to the Division of Administrative Hearings. On
August 1, 2008, an Initial Order was issued, directing the parties to identify the anticipated length of the hearing and dates upon which the parties were available. The Respondent filed a response to the Initial Order, requesting that the hearing be scheduled in St. Petersburg, Florida, and the hearing was scheduled accordingly. The case was transferred to the undersigned Administrative Law Judge on January 29, 2009.
At the hearing, Petitioner, Michael Konczal, testified on his own behalf. The Respondent's representative testified on behalf of the Respondent. No exhibits were offered into evidence.
No transcript of the hearing was filed. The Respondent filed a Proposed Recommended Order.
FINDINGS OF FACT
LS MotorSports is seeking to establish a new point motor vehicle dealership in St. Petersburg, Florida, for line- make Chunfeng Holding Group Co. Ltd.(CFHG).
The Respondent is an existing franchise motor dealer for line-make Chunfeng Holding Group Co. Ltd.(CFHG) and is located within 12.5 miles of the proposed new point motor vehicle dealership location. The majority of the Respondent's vehicle sales come from within a 12.5-mile radius of the proposed dealership.
The Respondent timely filed a protest of LS MotorSports’ proposed dealership.
There is no evidence that the Respondent is not providing adequate representation within the territory of the motor vehicles at issue in this proceeding.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to and subject matter of this proceeding. §§ 120.569 and 120.57, Fla. Stat. (2008).
Subsection 320.642(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), provides as follows:
An application for a motor vehicle dealer license in any community or territory shall be denied when:
A timely protest is filed by a presently existing franchised motor vehicle dealer with standing to protest as defined in subsection (3); and
The licensee fails to show that the existing franchised dealer or dealers who register new motor vehicle retail sales or retail leases of the same line-make in the community or territory of the proposed dealership are not providing adequate representation of such line-make motor vehicles in such community or territory. The burden of proof in establishing inadequate representation shall be on the licensee. (Emphasis supplied)
The licensees in this case are Petitioners, LS Motorsports and Michael J. Konczal, Inc. See
§§ 320.60(8) and 320.61, Fla. Stat. (2008).
As the licensees, the Petitioners have the burden of establishing compliance with applicable statutory requirements by a preponderance of the evidence presented at the hearing.
§ 320.642(2)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2008). The Petitioners have
failed to establish that the Respondent is not providing adequate representation of the line-make Chunfeng Holding Group Co. Ltd.(CFHG).
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles enter a final order denying the application for establishment of the motor vehicle dealer franchise at issue in this case.
DONE AND ENTERED this 5th day of March, 2009, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
S
WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 5th day of March, 2009.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Michael James Alderman, Esquire Department of Highway Safety and
Motor Vehicles
Neil Kirkman Building, Room A-432 2900 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32344
Mathu Solo
LS Motorsports, LLC
10215 South Sam Houston Parkway West Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77071
Michael Konczal
Michael J. Konczal, Inc.
1801 Twenty-Eighth Street, North St. Petersburg, Florida 33715
David Dubin
Seminole Scooters, Inc. 6227 Park Boulevard
Pinellas Park, Florida 33781
Carl A. Ford, Director Division of Motor Vehicles
Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Neil Kirkman Building, Room B-439 2900 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500
Robin Lotane, General Counsel Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Neil Kirkman Building
2900 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within
15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Apr. 16, 2009 | Final Order filed. |
Mar. 05, 2009 | Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency. |
Mar. 05, 2009 | Recommended Order (hearing held February 11, 2009). CASE CLOSED. |
Feb. 16, 2009 | Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed. |
Feb. 11, 2009 | CASE STATUS: Hearing Held. |
Jan. 29, 2009 | Notice of Transfer. |
Aug. 13, 2008 | Order of Pre-hearing Instructions. |
Aug. 13, 2008 | Notice of Hearing (hearing set for February 11, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; St. Petersburg, FL). |
Aug. 11, 2008 | Respondents Reply filed. |
Aug. 01, 2008 | Initial Order. |
Aug. 01, 2008 | Notice of Publication for a New Point Franchise Motor Vehicle Dealer filed. |
Aug. 01, 2008 | Notice of Intent to Establish a Dealership filed. |
Aug. 01, 2008 | Protest of Intent to Established Dealership filed. |
Aug. 01, 2008 | Agency referral filed. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Apr. 13, 2009 | Agency Final Order | |
Mar. 05, 2009 | Recommended Order | No evidence was presented that the existing franchise dealer is not adequatley representing the line-make. The new dealer application should be denied. |