Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE
Respondent: EDWARD A. PETERS
Judges: DANIEL M. KILBRIDE
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Mar. 04, 2009
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, April 9, 2009.
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA >
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION *
FLORIDA REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL BOARD
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & 5 A to
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, apl¥islon
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE SOHINIST RaSh
O4-USte PC HE ARInga VE
Petitioner,
v. CASE NO. 2006009924
EDWARD A. PETERS,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
The Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate
("Petitioner") files this Administrative Complaint against Edward A. Peters (“Respondent”), and
alleges:
ESSENTIAL ALLEGATIONS OF MATERIAL FACT
1. Petitioner is a state government licensing and regulatory agency charged with the
responsibility and duty to prosecute Administrative Complaints pursuant to the laws of the State of -
Florida, including Section 20.165 and Chapters 120, 455 and-475 of the Florida Statutes, and the
tules promulgated thereunder.
2. Respondent is currently a Florida state certified general real estate appraiser having been
issued license 1788 in accordance with Chapter 475 Part II of the Florida Statutes.
3. The last license the State issued to Respondent was as a state certified general real estate
appraiser at 6314 Lake Sunrise Drive, Apollo Beach, Florida 33572.
4. On or about November 12, 2005, Edward A. Peters (Respondent) developed and
FDBPR v. Edward A. Peters Case No. 2006009924
Administrative Complaint
communicated an appraisal report (Report 1) for a property commonly known as 24 Coxwaine Drive,
Rotonda West, FL 33947 (Subject Property), and estimated its value at $365,000. A copy of Report
1 is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Administrative Complaint Exhibit 1.
5. Respondent made the following general errors and omissions in Report 1:
(a) Misstatement of the acreage and square footage of the Subject Property;
(b) Failure to state the number and price range of the available comparable sales in the
Subject Property neighborhood at the top of page 2 of Report 1;
(c) Age adjustment to comparable sales of $1,000/year for every year older than the Subject
Property the comparable sale is, with no documentation to support the $1,000 adjustment.
6. Respondent made the following errors and omissions in the Sales Comparison Analysis
section of Report 1:
(a) Failure to state that comparable sales 1, 3, 4, and 5 had swimming pools;
(b) Failure to state that comparable sale 5 has a double lot;
(c). Failure to state that comparable sales 1, 3 and 4 are waterfront properties;
(d) Understatement of the distances of the comparable sales to the Subject Property by
approximately half; )
(e) Inconsistent application of price per square foot adjustments to the gross living area of
the comparable sales (Respondent utilized gross living area adjustments from $15.00/square foot to
$25.00/square foot). .
7. Copies of Google Earth maps showing the locations of Report 1 comparable sales 1, 3, 4,
5 and 6 (relative to the Subject Property) are attached hereto and incorporated herein as
FDBPR v. Edward A. Peters Case No. 2006009924
Administrative Complaint
Administrative Complaint Composite Exhibit 2.
8. Although Respondent made the above-listed errors in the Sales Comparison Analysis
Section of the Report, Respondent had the correct information in the workfile. Copies of the
Charlotte County Property Appraiser’s on line records for Report 1 comparable sales 1, 3, 4, and 5,
are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Administrative Complaint Composite Exhibit 3.
9. On or about November 23, 2005, Respondent prepared amendments to Report 1, and
communicated it to the client at the client’s request (Report 2). Respondent correct the omission of
the swimming pools from the comparable sale properties, and included different, newer sales as
comparable sales 4 and 5. A copy of Report 2 is attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Administrative Complaint Exhibit 2.
10. Respondent made the following errors and omissions in the Sales Comparison Analysis
section of Report 2: |
(a) Failure to state that comparable sales 3 and 4 are waterfront properties;
(b) Inconsistent application of price per square foot adjustments for gross living area to the
comparable sales (R utilized both a $15.00/square foot adjustment and a $20.00/square foot
adjustment);
(c) Understatement of the distances of the comparable sales to the Subject Property by
approximately half.
COUNT I
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent is guilty of misrepresentation in any business
transaction in violation of Section 475.624(2), Florida Statutes.
FDBPR v. Edward A. Peters Case No. 2006009924
Administrative Complaint
COUNT II
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent has violated a standard for the development or
‘communication of a real estate appraisal, specifically Standards Rule 1-1(a), (b), and (c), or other
provision of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (2005) in violation of Section
475.624(14), Florida Statutes.
COUNT II
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent has violated a standard for the development ‘or
communication of a real estate appraisal, specifically Standards Rule 1-4(a), or other provision of the
Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (2005) in violation of Section 475.624(14),
Florida Statutes.
COUNT IV
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent has violated a standard for the development or
communication of a real estate appraisal, specifically Standards Rule 2-1(a), (b) and (c), or other
provision of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (2005) in violation of Section -
475.624(14), Florida Statutes.
COUNT V
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent is guilty of having failed to exercise reasonable
diligence in developing an appraisal report in violation of Section 475.624(15), Florida Statutes.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Florida Real Estate Appraisal Board, or
the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, as may be appropriate, to issue a Final
Order as final agency action finding the Respondent(s) guilty as charged. The penalties which may
4
FDBPR v. Edward A. Peters : Case No. 2006009924
Administrative Complaint
be imposed for violation(s) of Chapter 475 of the Florida Statutes, depending upon the severity of the
offense(s), include: revocation of the license, registration, or certificate; suspension of the license,
registration or certificate for a period not to exceed ten (10) years; imposition of an administrative
fine of up to $5,000 for each count or offense; imposition of investigative costs; issuance of a
reprimand; imposition of probation subject to terms including, but not limited to, requiring the
licensee, registrant, or certificate holder to complete and pass additional appraisal education courses;
publication, or any combination of the foregoing which may apply. See Section 475.624, Florida
Statutes and Rule 61J1-8.002, Florida Administrative Code. The penalties which may be imposed
for violation(s) of Chapter 455 of the Florida Statutes, depending upon the severity of the offense(s),
include: revocation of the license, registration, or certificate; suspension of the license, registration,
or certificate for a period not to exceed ten (10) years; imposition of an administrative fine of up to
$5,000 for each count or offense; imposition of investigative costs; issuance of a reprimand;
imposition of probation subject to terms including, but not limited to, requiring the licensee,
registrant, or certificate holder to complete and pass additional appraisal education courses;
publication; restriction of practice; injunctive or mandamus relief; imposition of a cease and desist
order; or any combination of the foregoing which may apply. See Section 455.227, Fla. Statutes and
Florida Administrative Code Rule 61J1-8.002.
FDBPR v. Edward A. Peters Case No. 2006009924
Administrative Complaint :
SIGNED this rf day of
Florida Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
Thomas O’Bryant, Jr.
Director
Division of Real Estate
ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER
4
A
Robert Minarcin, Senior Attorney
Fla. Bar No. 163147
44 bdo Division of Real Estate
a LED : Legal Section
4rnent of Professional Regiran.,, 400 W. Robinson Street, N801
‘Division of Real Estate Orlando, Florida 32801-1757
(407) 481-5632
(407) 317-7260 - FAX
NOTICE TO RESPONDENTS
PLEASE BE ADVISED that mediation under Section 120.573 of the Florida
Statutes, is not available for administrative disputes involving this type of agency action.
PLEASE BE FURTHER ADVISED that pursuant to this Administrative
Complaint you may request, within the time allowed by law, a hearing to be conducted in this
matter in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes; that you have
the right, at your option and expense, to be represented by counsel or other qualified
representative in this matter; and that you have the right, at your option and expense, to take
testimony, to call and cross-examine witnesses, and to have subpoena and subpoena duces
6
FDBPR v. Edward A. Peters : Case No. 2006009924
Administrative Complaint
tecum issued on your behalf if a formal hearing is requested.
PLEASE BE FURTHER ADVISED that if you do not file an Election of Rights
form or some other responsive pleading with the Petitioner within twenty-one (21) days of
receipt of this Administrative Complaint, the Petitioner will file with the Florida Real Estate
Appraisal Board a motion requesting an informal hearing and entry of an appropriate Final
Order which may result in the suspension or revocation of your real estate license or
registration. Please see the enclosed Explanation of Rights and Election of Rights form.
PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES:
LOAN
File No. 2411124
wsesTShes INVOICE steteeeee
File Number: 2411424
NOVEMBER 12, 2005 .
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE
4300 CYPRESS SUITE 1000.
TAMPA, FL 33607
Borrower : SOLHTALAB, SHANE A~
Invoice # : fo, : .
Order Date: 1491172005.
Reference/Case #: LOAN
PO Number :
24 COXWAINE DR
ROTONDA WEST, FL 33947
+ t
Reat estate AperatsaL
FORM 1004.
3
Invoice Total { ‘ p
= $ 400.00
State Sales Tax ie ; $ 0.00
Deposit (s }
Deposit aS $
Amount Due
i
Terms: BALANCE DUE AT CLOSE OR;
Please Make Check Payable To:
PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES
6314 LAKE SUNRISE DR
APOLLO BEACH, FL 33572
Fed. 1D. #:
PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES
LOAN
File No. 2414124,
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE
4300 CYPRESS SUITE 1000.
TAMPA, FL 33607"
Fite Number: 2411124
RE CUSTOMER: SOLHTALAB, SHANE A
in accordance with your request, | have personally inspected and appraised the real property at:
24 COXWAINE DR
ROTONDA WEST, FL 33947
The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the subject property, as improved.
The property rights appraised are the fee simple interest in the site and improvements.
In my opinion, the estimated market value of the property as of November 12, 2005 is:
$365,000
Three Hundred Sity-Five Thousand Dollars
The attached report contains the description, analysis and supportive data for the conclusions,
final estimate of value, descriptive photographs, limiting conditions and appropriate certifications.
SINCERELY,
chad ¢ Be.
EDWARD A. PETERS
‘ST. CERT. GEN. REA.
813-645-3675.
EXHIBIT #
race 2 oF Eqs PAGER 92
+ PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES
LOAN#
File No. 241112.
APPRAISAL OF
LOCATED AT:
24 COXWAINE DR
ROTONDA WEST, Ft. 33947
FOR:
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE
4300 CYPRESS SUITE 1000.
TAMPA, FL 33607
BORROWER:
‘SSOLHTALAB, SHANE A
EDWARD A. PETERS
ST. CERT. GEN. REA.
6314 LAKE SUNRISE DR., APOLLO BEACH, Ft 33572
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT.
_S_ PAGER 93.
PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES.
LOAN#
Uniform: Residentiat Appraisal Report FleNo: 2401424
State FL Zip Gade 33947
Tax Yeat 2004"
‘ay Reference 41-24-31
Spocial Assessments $ 0.00
lLeasehokd | Other (describe)
Refinance Transaction { JOther (describe)
Addcess.4300.CY PRESS SUITE 1000., TAMPA, FL 33607
priot to. the effective date-of this apprais
ccf not analyze the contract for sale forthe subject purctiase transaction. Explain tie results ofthe anafysis of tie contract for sate or wity the analyst's was not perfarned.
CONTRACT NOT PROVIDED AT TIME OF APPRAISAL}
${000) _(yrs)
Jager sums [5<}3:6 mins [lower 6 aaps [°° 227 tow
“42 | Cottineicial_
16_other
Market Conditions ws Gung support forthe above conclusions) THE SUBJECT. IS: LOGATEDIN A:WELLY ESTABEISHED. RESALE AREA THATIS.NOT
INFLUENCED. BY CREATIVE OR UNUSUAL FINANCING. wi :
ecial Flood Hazard Area_[XJ¥es [_[No FEMA Flood Yone AE FEMAMap # 120061 0213F FEMA Map Date 05/05/2003
Are the utes and of-te improvements typical fo the market area? “Dx ves -[ JW} Wo, describe,
ervirqrmental conditions, land uses, etc)? L_Jves [X]No Ives, describe. APPRAISER
EN
TILENEW.
Bath Wainscot CERM TILE/NEW-
[BcJotnes HT PUM [rial ELEC
Coot L Teewatst one
Taide sod above geeeolig . 2F Baths) 1,946 Square Feet of Gross Living Area Above Grade:
‘Additional features (spciat energy efficient items, etc). BONE 1
Describe the condition of the. property (including needed repairs, detertoration, renovations, remodeling, etc). SUBJECT HOUSE HAS AN APPROPRIATE FLOOR PLAN
DESIGN WITH NO FUNCTIONAL OR PHYSICAL INADEGIUACIES AT THE TIME OF THE APPRAISAL, SUBJECT IS CONSIDERED NEW_
1HOMES CONTRACTORS. SUBJECT IS VACANT LOT AT TIME OF
Does the property generally conform to the neighborhood (functional utility, styte, condition, use, construction, etc)? (X]¥es [_]xo No, describe,
ia Wa For TO March 2005 "Prodan AOI Stes, 600 254727 meer aaeboom "Fania Waa Form 1004 March 2005
Page 106 “Wo 06 Ooms"
ADMINISTRATIVE - COMPLAL
EXHIBIT # 7 tg —_ BH PAGER 27
PAGE OF
PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES
LOAN#
ae _ Uniform Residential Appraisal Report Fie No, 2411124. *
comparable properties currently offered for sale in the subject neighborhood ranging in price from $- to$ i
fe sales in the subject neighborhood within the past twelve months in sale m toS. we al.
SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE NO. 1 COMPARABLE SALE NO. 2 COMPARABLE SALE NO. 3
24 COXWAINE DR 500 BOUNDARY BLVD 40 LONG MEADOW PL 49 MEDALIST RD
Address ROTONDA WEST, FL. ROTONDA WEST, FL ROTONDA WEST, FL ROTONDA WEST, FL
to Subj = 1.04 MILES 0.94 MILES 0.46 MILES
Sale Price $ 308,100 $ ‘365,000 $ 383,000 $ 370,000
Sale Prce/Gross Liv, Area_| $ 158.22 sq. {$ 160.72 sq.ft es 197.83 sq. $180.84 sq.ft
Data 5) INSP. COUNTY RECORDS INSP. COUNTY RECORDS. INSP. COUNTY RECORDS
Verification Sou ORB 2787-1543 ORB 2693-1090 ORB 2734-752
VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION 2418 Aajusmene DESCRIPTION “408 Adcom DESCRIPTION 22)$ Adnan
Sale or Financing CONV 0] conv 0/conv 0
Concessions NONE OL NONE O| NONE 9
Date of Sale/Time 08/24/2005 | 05/02/2005 0] o6r22/2005 0
Location SUBURBAN SUBURBAN 0 [SUBURBAN 0] SUBURBAN 9
LeasehoidiFee Simple | FEE SIMPLE FEE SIMPLE 0 [FEE SIMPLE oO] FEE SIMPLE 0
‘She 8250 10000;. | 10000 - 0| 10000 0
view RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL O[ RESIDENTIAL 0] RESIDENTIAL 0
Design (Styta) RANCH RANCH O| RANCH. [RANCH 0
Quaity of Construction | CBSAVG CBSIAVG 0} CBS/AVG o|cesave oO
Actual Age Q 4 +4000 4 4.900 4 44,000
Condition AVERAGE, AVERAGE O [AVERAGE O [AVERAGE 0
‘Above Grade Tot Baths Totat Sats, Toa Baths, oat Baths
Room Count él 3 ar] 8{ 3 oF of 71 3 2F o| ef 3 2F 0
Gross Living Area : 1,946 54, f. : “
Basement & Finished | NONE NONE 0] NONE - 0] NONE 0
Rooms Below Grate __| NONE. NONE O| NONE 0|NONE 9
Functional Utility AVERAGE AVERAGE O| AVERAGE *0| AVERAGE 0
Heating/Cooling CHA CHA o[ CHA O{CHA 0
Energy Efficient tems | NONE NONE 0] NONE 0 | NONE: 0
par. 2 GARAGE 2 GARAGE 0 [2 GARAGE 0|3 GARAGE -2,000
PorchiPatiorDeck ENCL PORCH ENCLPORCH. [| Q]ENCL PORCH O] ENCL PORCH 0
POOL 0 0 o| POOL & JACUZZI -12,500 [0 0
0 0 ofo ofo 9
00 Q 2 ofo 0
Net Ad + $ goof [_J» -_ Is a,300[ [x]+ - Is 500
Adjusted Sale Price Net Adi. -0. Net Adj. -2.2% % Net Ad. 0.1% %
of Comparables Gross Ad, 2.4% %6 1S 364,100 | Gruss Ac 4.4% % | $ 374,700 2.0% %]$ 370,500
1 Xpaie id not research the sate or transfer tistory ofthe subject property and comparable sales. ¥ not, explai
research |X]di¢_|__}did not reveal any prior sales or transfers of the subject property for the three years prior to the effective date of this appraisal
Data source(s)_COUNTY RECORDS i
tesearch |_Joid _[XJaid not reveal ‘sales or transfers of the comparable sales for the year prior to the date of sale of the comparable sale.
Data source(s) COUNTY RECORDS
Report the results ofthe research and analysis of the prior sale or transfer history of the subj ‘and comparable sales (report additional prior sales on page 3).
TEM SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE NO. 1 COMPARABLE SALE NO. 2 COMPARABLE SALE NO. 3
Date of Prior Sale/Transfer 07/2005 NONE, WITHIN 72 MONTHS [NONE, WITHIN 12 MONTHS ["NONE, WITHIN 12 MONTHS
Price of Prior Sale/Transfer {67,500 LOT ONLY
Data Sourca(s) CTY RECORDS COUNTY RECORDS COUNTY RECORDS COUNTY RECORDS
Effective Date of Data Source(s) _| 11/14/2005 44/11/2005. 4411172005 14/11/2005
Analysis of priar sale or transfer history of the subject property and comparable sales. SUBJECT PRIOR SALE WAS FOR LOT ONLY. THIS SALES WAS BELOW
MARKET VALUE DUE TO BUILDER PURCHASE PRICES. CURRENT LAND VALUES ARE IN THE RANGE OF $82K TO $90k WITH MIDDLE VALUE
INCLUDED AND USED IN COST APPROACH TO VALUE.
‘Summary of Sales Comparison Approach. SALES COMPS USED ARE THE MOST RECENT SALES AVAILABLE. EQUAL CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO
SALES USED. COST APPROACH OUTLINED ABOVE TENDS TO SUPPORT THE MARKET DATA APPROACH. ALL SALES USED ARE
CONSIDERED GOOD INDICATORS OF FAIR MARKET VALUE FOR SUBJECT NEIGHBORHOOD.
Indicated Value by Satos n Approach $ 365,000
Indicated Value by: Sales Comparison $365,000 Cost Approach (if devel $ 365,000 Income Approach (if developed) $ 0
ALL DATA HAS BEEN RECONCILED AND SELECTED WITH MORE EMPHASIS ON THE MARKET DATA APPROACH, WHICH IS THE BEST
INDICATOR OF VALUE IN TODAY'S MARKET, BECAUSE IT BEST REFLECTS THE ACTIONS OF BUYERS AND SELLERS IN THE MARKET PLACE.
‘This appraisalis made [_J*as's* [Jsubjectto completion per plans and specications on the bass ofa typothetical condtion thatthe Improvements have been completed,
C)subjectto the folowing repairs or lteratons onthe basis ofa hypothetical conition thatthe repairs or erations have been completed, or {__}subjectto the folowing required
Inspection based on the extraordinary assumption that the condition or deficiency does not require alteration or repair: SUBJECT 1S CONSIDERED NEW CONSTRUCTION
Based on a complete visual inspection of the interior and exterior areas of the subject property. defined scope of work. statement of assumptions and fimiting
Conditions, and appraiser's certification. my (our) opinion of the market value, as defined, of the real property that is the subject of this report is $ 365,000
asof__ 11/12/2005, which is the date of ir fon and the effective date of this appraisat,
Max Fay 70 Warch 2005 Pred A shea, 2023472) we ade Tee Fom 1008
Page 2af6 ‘td 05 033005
ADM PRA TIVE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT a EXHIBIT? s__ PAGE# 3.5”
PAGE 2 OF
PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES.
LOAN#
Uniform Residential Appraisal Report Fle No, 2441124
Provide adequate information forthe lendericlient to replicate the helow cost figures and calculations.
‘Support for the opinion of site value (summary of compatable fand sales ar other metods for estimating ske value) Land value determined by allocation and extraction methods
and recent lot sales.
ESTIMATED REPRODUCTION OR [é3] JREPLACEMENT COST NEW OPINION OF SITE VALUE...
‘Source of cast data MARSHALL AND SWIFT AND KNOW COSTS. i
Quality rating from cost service GOOD. Effective date of cost data SEPT 2005
Comments on Cost Approach (gross fiving area calculations, depreciation, etc.)
COST APPROACH IS BASED ON THE MARSHALL AND SWIFT TABLES
AND COST KNOWN TO THE APPRAISER. NO FUNCTIONAL OR
EXTERNAL OBSOLESCENCE OBSERVED. SUBJECT SITE VALUE IS
23% OF THE TOTAL COST APPROACH VALUE. THIS IS CONSIDERED
AVERAGE FOR THIS PART OF THE COUNTY. IMPROVEMENTS
INCLUDE WELL AND SEPTIC TANK, DRIVE, WALKS, LANDSCAPING,
AND LOT PREP.
Provide the folowing information for PUDs ONLY i the developertbuldcr is in contral of the HOA and the sublect property is an attached dwelling unit.
al name of project
Total number of units
Total number of units rented Totat number of units for sale
‘Was the project created by the conversion of an ext (s) into a PUD? Yes. jNo_ if Yes, date of conversion.
Does the project contain any mutti-dwelling units? Yes No Chech
‘Are the unkts, common elements, and recreation facilities complete? Yes No ff No, describe the stalus of completion.
ADMINISTRATHE COMPLAINT =
EXHIBIT 4
roe Ge ERHIIT_S PAGER 2°
PETERS.APPRAISAL SERVICES.
LOAN
Uniform Residential.Appraisal Report Fle No. 2411124
This report form is designed to report an appraisal of a one-unit property or a one-unit property with an accessory unit; including a
unit in a planned unit development (PUD). This report form is not designed to report an appraisal of a manufactured home of 2 unit
in a condominium or cooperative project.
This appraisal report is subject to the following scape of work, intended use, intended user, definition of market value, statement of
assumptions and limiting conditions, and certifications. Modifications, additions, or deletions to the intended use, intended user,
definition of market value, ot assumptions and limiting conditions are not permitted. The appraiser may expand the scope of work
to include any. additional research or analysis necessary based on the complexity of this appraisal assignment. Modifications or
deletions to the certifications are also not permitted. However, additional certifications that do not constitute materiat atterations
to this appraisal report, such as those required by law or those related fo the appraiser's continuing education or membership in an
appraisal organization, are permitted.
SCOPE OF WORK: The scope of work for this appraisal is defined by the complexity of this appraisal assignment and the
feporting requirements of this appraisal report form, including the following definition of market value, statement of assumptions
and limiting conditions, and certifications. The appraiser must, at a minimum: (1) perform a complete visual inspection of the
interior and exterior areas of the subject property, (2) inspect the neighborhood, (3) inspect each of the comparable sales from at
least the street, (4) research, verify, and analyze data from reliable public and/or private sources, and (5) report his or her analysis,
opinions, and conclusions in this appraisal report.
INTENDED USE: The intended use of this appraisal report is for the lender/client to evaluate the property that is the subject of
this appraisal for a mortgage finance transaction.
INTENDED USER: The intended user of this appraisal report is the lender/client.
DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market
under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is
not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition Is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of
title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (1) buyer and seller are typically motivated; (2) both parties are well informed
or well advised, and each acting in what he or she considers-his or her own best interest; (3) a reasonable time is allowed for
exposure in the open market; (4) payment is made in terms of cash in U. S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements
comparable thereto; and (5) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative
financing or sales concessions* granted by anyone associated with the sale.
*Adjustments to the comparables must be made for special or creative financing or sales concessions. No adjustments are
necessary for those costs which are normally paid by sellers as a result of tradition or law in a market area; these costs are readily
identifiable since the seller pays these costs in virtually all sales transactions. Special or creative financing adjustments can be
made to the comparable property by comparisons to financing terms offered by a third party institutional lender that is not already
involved in the property or transaction. Any adjustment should not be calculated on a mechanical dollar for dollar cost of the
financing or concession but the dollar amount of any adjustment should approximate the market's reaction to the financing or
concessions based on the appraiser's judgment.
STATEMENT OF ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: The appraiser's certification in this report is subject to the
following assumptions and limiting conditions:
1. The appraiser will not be responsible for matters of a tegal nature that affect either the property being appraised or the title
to it, except for information that he or she became aware of during the research involved in performing this appraisal. The
appraiser assumes that the title is good and marketable and will not render any opinions about the title.
2. The appraiser has provided a sketch in this appraisal report to show the approximate dimensions of the improvements. The
Sketch is included only to assist the reader in visualizing the property and understanding the appraiser's determination of its size.
3. The appraiser has examined the available flood maps that are provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (or
other data sources) and has noted in this appraisat report whether. any portion of the subject site is located in an identified Special
Flood Hazard Area. Because the appraiser is not a surveyor, he or she makes no guarantees, express or implied, regarding this
‘determination.
4. The appraiser will not give testimony or appear in court because he or she made an appraisal of the property in question,
unless specific arrangements to do so have been made beforehand, or as otherwise required by law.
5. The appraiser has noted in this appfaisal report any adverse conditions (such as needed repairs, deterioration, the presence of
hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc.) observed during the inspection of the subject property or that he or she became aware of
during the research involved in performing this appraisal. Unless otherwise stated in this appraisal report, the appraiser has no
knowledge of any hidden or unapparent physical deficiencies or adverse conditions of the property (such as, but not limited to,
needed repairs, deterioration, the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, adverse environmental conditions, etc.) that
would make the property less valuable, and has assumed that there are no such conditions and makes no guarantees or
warranties, express or implied. The appraiser wil not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or
testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because the appraiser is not an expert in the field of
environmental hazards, this appraisal.report must not be considered as an environmental assessment of the property.
6. The appraiser has based his or her appraisal report and valuation conclusion for an appraisal that is subject to satisfactory
completion, repairs, or alterations on the assumption that the completion, repairs, or alterations of the subject property will be
Performed.in a professional manner.
exHisit #4
PAL ? or EXHIBIT Ss PAGE 32
pereenwntnwee od
PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES
LOAN#
Uniform Residential Appraisal Report Fle No. 2411124
APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: The Appraiser certifies and agrees that:
1. thave, at a minimum, developed and reported this appraisal in accordance with the scope of work requirements stated in this
appraisal report.
2. {performed a complete visual inspection of the interior and exterior areas of the subject property. | reported the condition of
the improvements in factual, specific terms. | identified and reported the physica! deficiencies that could affect the livability,
soundness, or structurat integrity of the property.
3. | performed this appraisal In accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
‘that were adopted and promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of The Appraisal Foundation and that were in place at the
time this appraisal! report was prepared.
4. | developed my opinion of the market value of the real property that is the subject of this report based on the sales comparison
approach to value. | have adequate comparable market data to develop a reliable sales comparison approach for this appraisal
assignment. .| further certify that.l considered the cost and.income approaches to value but did not develop them, unless otherwise
indicated in this report.
5. researched, verified, analyzed, and. reported on. any current agreement for sale for the subject property, any. offering for sale
of the subject property in the twelve months prior to the effective date of this appraisal, and the prior sales of the subject property
for a minimum of three years prior to the effective date of this appraisal, unless otherwise indicated in this report.
6. researched, verified, analyzed, and reported on the prior sales of the comparable sales for a minimum of one year prior to the
date of sale of the comparable sale, uniess otherwise indicated in this report.
7. 1 selected and used comparable sales that are locationally, physically, and functionally the most similar to the subject property.
8. Thave not used comparable sales that were the result of combining a land sale with the contract purchase price of ahome
that has been built or will be built on the land.
9. Ihave reported adjustments to the comparable sales that reflect the market's reaction to the differences between the subject
property and the comparable sales.
10. I verified, from a:disinterested source, all information in this report that was provided by parties who have a financial interest in
the sale or financing of the subject property.
11. | have knowledge and experience in appraising this type of property in this market area.
12, am aware of, and have access fo, the necassary and appropriate public and private data sources, such as multiple listing
services, tax assessment records, public land records and other such data sources for the area in which the property is located.
13. | obtained the information, estimates, and-opinions-fumished. by other parties-and. expressed. in this. appraisal. report from.
reliable sources that { believe to be true and correct.
144, (‘have taken into-consideration the factors that have an impact-on-value with respect to the-subject neighborhood, ‘subject
property, and the proximity of the subject property to adverse influences in the development of my opinion of market value. | have
noted in this appraisal report any adverse conditions (such as, but not limited to, needed repairs, deterioration, the presence of
hazardous wastes, toxic substances, adverse environmental conditions, etc.) observed during the inspection of the subject property
or that | became aware of during the research involved in performing this appraisal. | have considered these adverse conditions in
My analysis ofthe property value, and_.have.ceparted on.the.effect of the conditions on the value and marketability of the subject
Property.
15. have net knowingly withheld.any. significant-information- from-this. appraisal. report. and, to-the-best of my. knowledge, all.
Statements and information in this appraisal report are true and correct.
46. \-stated-in-this appraisal-report-my- own-personal, unbiased, and-professional analysis, opinions, and-conclusions, which are
subject only to the assumptions and limiting conditions in this appraisal report.
| 17. Firave no present or prospective interest ir the property that is the subject of this report, andl traveno present or prospective
Personal interest or bias with respect to the participants in the transaction. 1 did not base, either partially or completely, my
analysis and/or opinion of market value in this appraisal report on the race, color, religion, sex, age, marital status, handicap,
familial status, or national origin of either the prospective owners or occupants of the subject property or of the present owners or
‘occupants of the properties in the vicinity of the subject property or on any other basis prohibited by law.
18. My employment and/or compensation for performing this appraisal or any future or anticipated appraisals was not conditioned
‘on any agreement or understanding, written or otherwise, that | would report (or present analysis supporting) a predetermined
“specific value, a predetermined minimum-value, a-range or direction in value, a value-that favors-the cause of any party, or the
attainment of a specific result or occurrence of a specific subsequent event (such as approval of a pending mortgage loan
application).
19. | personally prepared all conclusions and opinions about the real estate that were set forth in this appraisal report. If! relied on
significant real property appraisal assistance from any individual or individuals in the performance of this appraisal or the
preparation of this appraisal report, | have named such individual(s) and disclosed the specific tasks performed in this appraisal
report. | certify that any individual so named is qualified to perform the tasks. | have not authorized anyone to make a change to
+ any- item: in-this-appraisal report; therefore, any-change-made to-this-appraisal is unauthorized-and.| will take.no.responsibility-for it.
20. | identified the tender/client in this appraisal report who is the individual, organization, or agent for the organization that ordered
and-wilt receive this appraisal report. ,
exniair 44
PAGE | Ee 2S
s PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES
Uniform Residential Appraisal Report
LOAN#
File No. 2441124
21. The lender/ctient may disclose ar distribute this appraisal report to: the borrower; another lender at the request of the borrower;
the mortgagee or its successors and assigns; mortgage insurers; government sponsored enterprises; other secondary market
participants; data collection or reporting services; professional appraisal organizations; any department, agency, or instrumentality
of the United States; and any state, the District of Columbia, or other jurisdictions; without having to obtain the appraiser's of
supervisory appraiser's (if applicable) consent. Such consent must be obtained before this appraisat report may be disclosed or
distributed to any other party (including, but not limited to, the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other
media).
22. | am aware that any disclosure or distribution of this appraisal report by me or the lender/client may be subject to certain laws
and regulations. Further, { am also subject to the provisions of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice that
pertain to disclosure or distribution by me.
23. The borrower, another lender at the request of the borrower, the mortgagee or its successors and assigns, mortgage insurers,
government sponsored enterprises, and other secondary. market participants may rely on this appraisal report as part of any
mortgage finance transaction that involves any one or more of these parties.
24. If this appraisal report was transmitted as an “electronic record” containing my “electronic signature,” as those terms are
defined in applicable federal and/or state laws (excluding audio and video recordings), or a facsimile transmission of this appraisal.
Feport containing a copy or representation of my signature, the appraisal report shail be as effective, enforceable and valid as if a
Paper version of this appraisal report were delivered containing my original hand written signature.
25. Any intentional or negligent misrepresentation(s) contained in this appraisal report may result in civil liability and/or criminal
penalties including, but not limited to, fine or imprisonment or both under the pravisions of Title 18, United States Code, Section
1001, et seq., or similar state taws. .
SUPERVISORY APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: The Supervisory Appraiser certifies and agrees that:
1. I directly supervised the appraiser for this appraisal assignment, have read the appraisal report, and agree with the appraiser's
analysis, opinions, statements, conclusions, and the appraiser's certification,
2. accept full responsibility for the contents of this appraisal report including, but not limited to, the appraiser's analysis,
opinions, statements, conclusions, and the appraiser's certification.
3. The appraiser identified in this appraisal report is either a sub-cantractor or an employee of the supervisory appraiser (or the
appraisal firm), is qualified to perform this appraisal, and is acceptable to perform this appraisal under the applicable state law.
4. This appraisal report complies with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice that were adopted and
promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of The Appraisal Foundation and that were in place at the time this appraisal
report was prepared.
5. If this appraisal report was transmitted as an ‘electronic record” containing my “electronic signature,” as those terms are
defined in applicable federal and/or state laws (excluding audio and video recordings), or a facsimile transmission of this appraisal
report containing a copy or representation of my signature, the appraisal report shall be as effective, enforceable and valid as if a
Paper version of this appraisal report were delivered containing my original hand written signature.
APPRAISER
Signature a
Name EDWARDA. PETERS.
Company Name PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES
Company Address 6314 LAKE SUNRISE DR
APOLLO BEACH, FL 33572
Telephone Number 813-645-3675
Email Address edward net
Date of Signature and Report 11/12/2005
Effective Date of Appraisal 11/12/2005
State Certification # RZ0001788
or State License #
or Other (describe)
State FL
Expiration Date of Certification or License 11/30/2006
ST. CERT. GEN. REA.
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY APPRAISED
24 COXWAINE DR
ROTONDA WEST, FL. 33947
APPRAISED VALUE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY $ 365,000
State #
LENDER/CLIENT
Name NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE.
Company Name NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE
‘Company Address 4300 CYPRESS SUITE 1000.
SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (ONLY IF REQUIRED]
‘Signature
Name
Company Name
Company Address
Telephone Number
Email Address
Date of Signature
Expiration Date of Certification or License
SUBJECT PROPERTY
(Dia not inspect subject property
CDia inspect exterior of subject property from street
Date of inspection
Obia inspect interior and exterior of subject property
Date of Inspection
COMPARABLE SALES.
|Did not inspect exterior of comparable sales from street
Did inspect exterior of comparable sales from street
TAMPA, FL 33607
Poe Tae eT |
EXMTBT Se
Date of Inspection
TE COMPLAINT
AGE 32.
PETERS. APPRAISAL SERVICES.
LOAN#
; Uniform Residential Appraisal Report Fle No. 2411124
FEATURE SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE NO. 4 COMPARABLE SALE NO. 5 COMPARABLE SALE NO. 6
24 COXWAINE DR 14 LONG MEADOW LN 5 LONG MEADOW LN 228 SPORTSMAN RD
‘Nddréss- ROTONDA: WEST, Ft ROTONDA WEST; FL ROTONDA WEST; FL: ROTONDA WEST; FL
Proximity to S 0.78 MILES 0.79 MHES 1.45 MILES :
Sale Price $ 308,100 $ 345,000 $s 353,000 3. 369,900
Sale PricefGrss tv. area_|'$ 158.32 sq. |$ 165.18 sq.ft $181.03 59,8 GRAS 184.40 sq.
Data Sai INSP. COUNTY RECORDS. INSP, COUNTY RECORDS INSP. COUNTY RECORDS
Verification Source(s). ORB 2733-2075 ORB 2671-1515 {ose ‘2757-280
‘VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION 2)sAdpsimen [DESCRIPTION ses hdjemen | OESCRIPTION 4) Ajeet
Sale or Financing CONV 0{conv {conv 0
Conidessions NONE 2 O}NONE O;NONE cis
Date of SalefTine 06/21/2005 of 0405/2005. 0 07/21/2005. o
Location SUBURBAN SUBURBAN. 0] SUBURBAN 0 [SUBURBAN 9
LeaseholdiF ee Sim FEE SIMPLE FEE SIMPLE [FEE SIMPLE 0] FEE SIMPLE 0
Site 8250 10000 | 40000 0410000: a
iow RESIDENTIAL [RESIDENTIAL O| RESIDENTIAL 0 |RESIDENTIAL, a
Desi ) RANCH RANCH 0] RANCH O| RANCH 9
Quality of Construction | CBS/AVG CBSIAVG O|CBSAVG a[cesiave 0
‘Actual oO ir i +9000 9” +9000} 10" +10,000'
Condition AVERAGE AVERAGE O| AVERAGE O| AVERAGE 0
‘Above Grade Total sats | Tou Bats Taal Bats tot lees <
Room Count el 3 2F{ 6] 3 ws ef 3 2F oj 7] 3 2F 9
Gross Living Area 4,946 sq. f.
Basement &Finished | NONE NONE " 0] NONE | NON °
Rooms Below Grade__| NONE NONE O| NONE O| NONE
Functional utiity _ AVERAGE AVERAGE O {AVERAGE OJ AVERAGE
CHA CHA O{CHA ol CHA.
Energy Efficient tems | NONE NONE 0] NONE O|NONE
ela 2GARAGE 2. GARAGE 02 GARAGE 0 {2 GARAGE
Porch’Patio/Deck ENCL PORCH _{ENCL PORCH O] ENCL PORCH O[ENCL PORCH
POOL oO i‘) ojo oO] POOL ~10,500
jo ‘To ofo @ 0
[00 6 alo alo oO
Net. XJ+ IS 7,000} [XI+ - s 8,900 + Due [$s 1,400.
‘Adjusted Sale Price Net Ad. 2.0% % Net Ad. 2.5% % Net Adj. -0.4% %
of Grass Ad, 3.2% %1$ 352,000 | Gross Ad.2.6%_%]$ 361,900 | Gross Ad 5.8% % | $ 368,500
~aTEM SUBJECT “* COMPARABLE SALE NO. 4 > COMPARABLE SALE.NO-5 COMPARABLE SALENO.6
Date of Prior Sale/Transfer 07/2005 NONE OVER 12MONTHS _|NONE OVER 12 MONTHS [NONE OVER 12 MONTHS
rica of Prior Sale/Transfer $67,500 LOT ONLY : a . :
Data Source(s) CTY RECORDS COUNTY RECORDS" COUNTY RECORDS COUNTY RECORDS
Effective Date of Data Source(s) | 11/11/2005 1414/2005 1441/2005 1471472005
‘Summary of Sales Comparison Approach ABOVE SALES ARE AVAILABLE AND USED IN THIS REPORT QUE TO NEW CONSTRUCTION OF SUBJECT IN =.
PROVIDING EXTRA SALES COMPS FOR CONSIDERATION..
Fredo Wac Form 70 March
Borrower: SOLHTALAB, SHANE A File No.:_241112A
Property Address: 24 COXWAINE DR Case No.: LOAN
‘| City, ROTONDA WEST Zip: 33947
Lender. NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE
-Neighborhood.Boundaries .
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED BETWEEN GULFSTREAM BLVD TO THE NORTH, CHARLOTTE HARBOR TO THE EAST,
APPLETON BLVD TO THE SOUTH AND ROTUNDA BLVD N TO THE WEST.
Conditions of Appraisal
THIS APPRAISAL IS MADE “SUBJECT TO PLANS AND SPECS", AND PER LENDERS INSTRUCTIONS. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE IN
THIS REPORT IS TO BE CONSIDERED AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE FOR EDWARD A. PETERS.
Additional Comments
APPRAISAL INFORMATION GATHERING AND REPORTING:
This appraisal report is a Summary Appraisal report which is intended to comply with the requirements established under Standards Rule
2-2{b) of Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice for a Summary Appraisal report. This report is a summary of the information,
Fationale.and.analysis.used in the appraisal.process to.determine.the appraiser's estimate-of value. Supporting documentation .is.retained in
the appraiser's file and may not appear in this report. 4
’ As part of the appraisal process, the appraiser has completed extensive research with respect to the subject property and the comparables
used. Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice were followed throughout the entire appraisal process, with no departures from
Standard 1.
‘Subjectis considered new construction and will’ have a higher or tower value than predominant market value wiiich includes all ages of
homes in the area. This is considered normat ar average for the area and has ne effect on marketability being subject's value is within the
tow and high end range of values as stated in form.
SCOPE OF APPRAISAL:
The_scope.of.this.appraisal 4s.to.analyze market conditions as of the effective date of the appraisal.and.consider.all approaches to vatue.in
order to estimate the subject's market value, as defined for it Highest and Best Use.
INTENDED USE OF APPRAISAL:
The intended use of this appraisal report is to determine an estimated market value of the subject property and to act as a tool for financing
and/or decision making by client. This appraisal is intended for the above mentioned client ‘only. .
This appraisal can be considered to be reliable with respect to the final value estimated. This appraisal should not be considered reliable
when individual fine items are viewed separately or taken out of the contest of this report °
COMPARABLE SALES ANALYSIS:
In the Comparable Sales Analysis recent comparables sales were selected based on age, size, quality condition and as near physically to
the subject's could be found. A search of public records produced no more recent similar sales. °
Land value determined by allocation and extraction methods and recent lot sates.
Quaiity of construction adjustments for the comparables sales were based on apparent marketplace reaction to quality of materials or
components, method of application, type of ornamentation, design, finish and evidence of ‘workmanship of the various commonest typical for
“this'class. items such as ceiting treight floor coverings, ‘material-and workmanship, ‘size werd numberof appointments ard
were taken into consideration.
Adjustments-applied.were derived.through- paired.sales.analysis-within-the subject marketplace. Differences .in.living-areas, bathrooms, and.
age were-adjusted accordifgly." Porches, pools and miscellaneous extras were adjusted according to apparent marketplace reaction to size
and quality. Sales comps used are similar developed lots vs subject and no location or site adjustment is necessary. Various differences in
‘Square footage of lot sizes is not reflected in market values for lot purchases in subject's area, Average ‘ot sizes vary between 8,000 -
11,000 sq. ft with no value difference shown in market lot sales. No adjustment is necessary for average size lot sales
FINAL ESTIMATE OF VALUE:
No personal property has been included in the final estimate of value.
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE:
‘This. report.contains digital. signature.that are encrypted. and_password_protected for. use.only. by. the-appraiser. signing this. repost.
i _
ace _ oF EXHIBITE <_ PAGER _¢7
. SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTO: ADDENDUM: >
Borrower: SOLHTALAB, SHANE A File No.: 2411124
| Property Address:24 COXWAINE DR Case No.: LOAN#
City: ROTONDA WEST State: FL. Zip: 33947,
Lender: NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE
FRONT VIEW OF
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Appraised: Date:November 12; 2005
Appraised Value: $ 365,000
REAR VIEW OF
‘SUBJECT PROPERTY
STREET SCENE
EXHIBIT 4
PAGE 2 EXHIBITE x PAGE# ¥2_
. COMPARABLE PROPERTY PHOTO ADDENDUM:
Borrower: SOLHTALAB, SHANE A File No. 2411124
| Property Address: 24 COXWAINE DR Case No.: LOANH
City: ROTONDA. WEST State: Fi. Zip: 33947
{_ Lender: NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE
COMPARABLE SALE #1
500 BOUNDARY BLVD"
ROTONDA WEST, FL
Sale Date: osrzar2005°
Sale Price: $ 365,000
COMPARABLE SALE #2.
‘40 LONG MEADOW PL
ROTONDA WEST, FL
~ Safe Date: 0570272005
Sale Price: $ 383,000
COMPARABLE SALE #3
19 MEDALIST RD"
ROTONDA WEST, FL
Sale Date: cezz2005°
Sate Price: $ 370,000
ae COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT 4
pace _ 13 PRHIBITE. SPACER 32"
COMPARABLE PROPERTY.PHOTO ADDENDUM
Borrower: SOLHTALAB, SHANE A File No: 2411124
Property Address:24 COXWAINE DR Case Nos LOANS
City: ROTONDA WEST State: FL Zip: 33047
Lender: NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE,
COMPARABLE SALE #4
14 LONG MEADOW LN
ROTONDA WEST, FL.
Sale Date: 06/21/2005
Sale Price: $ 345,000
COMPARABLE SALE #5
5 LONG MEADOW LN
ROTONDA WEST, FL
Sale Date: 0470672005
Sale Price: $ 353,000
COMPARABLE SALE #6
226'SPORTSMAN RD’
ROTONDA WEST, FL
Sale Date: o77z12005°
Sale Price: $ 369,900
LOCATION MAP
Borrower: SOLHTALAB, SHANE A File No.:_ 2411124. |
Property Address:24 COXWAINE DR. " Case No. LOANS
City: ROTONDA WEST State: FL Zip: 33947
Lender: NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE
6314 LAKE SUNRISE DR., APOLLO BEAGH, FL 33572
EXHIBIT #
PAGE IE Ss PAGE gs
PLAT MAP
Borrower: SOLHTALAB, SHANE A File No: 2411124
Property Address:24 COXWAINE-DR ‘ :_: Case-Nos.
City: ROTONDA WEST State: FL
Lender: NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE
PAGE a OF — HERR s_ s_ PAGE ZZ
PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES -
Borrower: SOLHTALAB, SHANE A File No.:_2411424
‘Address:.24 COXWAINE DR Case. Ng.: LOANS
City: ROTONDA WEST : Zip: 33047
Lender: NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
ESOYTB PhO |, APOLLO BEACH, FL 33572 —
eace 12. oF EXHIBITS PAGER #7”
PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES”
Borrower: SOLHTALAB, SHANE A. File No.:_ 2411424
| Property Address:24 COXWAINE.DR - ___ Case No. LOAN
City: ROTONDA WEST. : ‘ State: FL. Zip: 33947
Lender: NATIONAL, CITY MORTGAGE.
: ~ rc wc wots
ori ate ie
AMINES LRAT WE COMPLAINT
Borrower: SOLHTALAB, SHANE A.
FLOORPLAN
Fife No.:_ 2411124
Property Address:24 COXWAINE DR
City: ROTONDA WEST.
Lender: NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE
Case No.:LOANK
State: FL
Zip: 33047,
28.0 x
SO x
24.0 x
43.0
aaco
24.0
3 Areas Total (rounded)
°” PETERS APPRAISAL SERVICES
Borrower; SOLHTALAB, SHANE A 7 File No: 2411124
Property Address: 24 COXWAINE DR. 4 ~ Case Na: Loans
| City: ROTONDA WEST wt State: Ft. Zip: 33047
Lender: NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
PAGE 20 OF ype = PAGER SO
Location Map
Borrower
Property Address_ 24 Coxwaine Drive
Zip Code_33947.
a Comparable #1 ‘ i a es és f i :
# 500 Boundary Blyd :
i 3.68 miles NW
Comparable # 6
omparable # Comparable # 4
FT niles NW 14 Long Meadow
2Tentles SW 2.68 miles NW
5 Long Meadow La
Comparable # 2
40 Long Meadow Place
1.96 miles N
SY, CARRIE,
Subject z on i
24 Conwaine Drive
Fame: sa OF — b PAGE# Khe
{Borrower
Property Address 24 Coxwaine Drive
City Rotonda West County Charlotte State FL Zp Code 33947
Lender
First Floor
Covered En!
Covered Porch
Garage
Net LIVABLE Area
AleMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINE
Form SKT.BIdSki — *WinTOTAL” abba iby a ktfode, inc, — 1-800-ALAMODE
PAGE 92
‘2! et
Bhs itd Meal |_rroonean | (EY BES
: EXHIBIT 2 :
PAGE 23 of _ EXHIBIT#2_ PAGEF >
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT #2
PAGE) OF
EXHIBIT#_72_ PAGE# 722
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT.
EXHIBIT #2
PAGE .¢ OF
EXHIBIT#_/> PAGER sox.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT.
EXHIBIT #2
PAGE _ OF
EXHIBIT#_72 PAGE# 729
ADIVINGS TRALIVE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT #o?
PAGE OF
EXHIBIT#_/2_ PAGE# 772
SGouyle turthy
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT -
EXHIBIT #2
PAGE 5 OF
EXHIBIT#_72_ PAGE# /77_
MPLAINT
ECO
INISTRATIV
iM
EXHIBIT
PAGE
AD
2
EXHIBIT#_/>_ PAGE# 72.
is)
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT #20.
PAGE 7 OF
EXHIBIT > PAGER 22 >
ADMINISTRA PLAIN’
EXHIBIT #3 ve COMBINE
PAGE
EXHIBIT#_ >. PAGE# 7%
Ifa disgeepancy | is discovered in your property’ 's records, or those of another, please bring it to our attention
immediately.
General Parcel Information far 0096870-095000-5
Future Land Use (Comp. To a
D lan): D
a pears & SE fi ct:
FEMA Flood Zone rere 5/5/2003),
B= See =i [ae |
oi92F || | IN-_|{ 10a [12015¢. SORA OUT]
*If parcel has more than 1 flood zone refer to the flood maps available o on the GIS a site by clicking on
01925 eee 12015C || COBRA_OUT
iew Map below. Click here for definitions.
~ Ownership Information : Sales Information
2 MATOS MONCAE [exces Selling |
Tine eros aca
ET TN [vacant __|[___$9,000 ]
ga ec
ADMNSTRATHE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT #2
™ “TH ig PAGER 73
Preliminary values within this box are NOT
ertified (final) values. Consequently, they can
g ted.
Amount OF axes 1rald Dy...
Tax
Information
To see your tax bill or pay it on-line click here.
Building Inforthation
Enclosed Porch (SF),
(Knee Walls w/ Glass
CHIBI +
an
——e
Ifa discrepancy i is discovered in your property’ 8 records, or those of another, please bring it to our
attention immediately. ;
is Me 19 MEDALIST
|
General Parcel Information for 0096877-055
Pode: __ _—
al Le | ot
jes_[Seling Price
“89,900 |
[$370,000 |
L__si00 |
ee
Value Land: ar Assessed V a
—_ es
| _$24,247 ||
PAGE 2 OF , 2 PAGER 22.
Preliminary values within this box are
IN IT certified (final) values. Consequently,
To see your tax bill or pay it on-line click here.
1
Building Information
Arc Total
Area | ac | pot
.
ROTONDA WEST WH
734/752 ADMINISTRATIVE COMP
if is Pp disorepancy i is discovered in your property's roots or those of another, plese bring it to our
attention immediately.
General Parcel Information for 0096858-0228 00-7,
es ID / Account ,
umber:
BusinessName: |
Map Number: 2B
Current Use: SINGLE FAMILY __| FAMIL
Future Land Use OW a
Comp. Plan): a
FEMA Flood Zone (Effective 5/5/2003)
Firm | =]
Fass as i
[oar || [ COBRA_OUT |
bd parcel has more than 1 flood zone se to the flood maps 1 maps availabld on the G Gis web site i
licking on View Map below. Click here for definitions,
Ownership Information Sales Information
an]
[__ $201,226 |
[_$201,226 |
[_ $0]
pity 3 PAGER 2c
Total Just Value:
| $207,578 |
[$207,578 ]
“Preliminary values within this box are NOT
ertjfied (final) values. Consequently, they
an change periodically as records are
ated.
ea of a I = ark
Set i
Information
To see your tax bill or pay it‘on-line click hete.
Building Information
Ls 2076 | 2774
fir een ie Tile SF or %
[621_|[Slab on Grade (% or SI _
| fi |
[Ermer ome
Slab a (SF)
with Roof 7
Enclosed Porch i
(SF), Knee Walls |
|
Home @ Send Us Email
Copyright © 1997-2004 Charlotte County Property Appraiser. All rights reserved.
. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPUA
on a Bur > PAGE# 2g.
rage \ ats
Tax Collector
If a discrepancy i is discovered in your property's records, or those of another,
attention immediately.
General Parcel Information for 0096858-621900-8
1 ID / Account ;
Tie ber: 0096858-021900-8 a fe se Address
please bring it to our
Busin PSs ness Name: |
: _———____|Froperty Zin C
Map Number:
[Current Use: [SINGLE FAMILY
(Future Land Use OWDENSITY
(Comp. Plan): [RESIDENTIAL
! ee
=—e
Weterromt: nt:
ere Flood Zone (ittestve 5/5/2003) |
LS emer] os [cones]
Be EON oa
Loar || _—|[our ]
citar parcel has more than 1 flood zone refer to the flood on available on the GIS web site by
uT | x fia aoe Ro _
g on View Map below. Click here for definitions. |
Ownership Information
t r ULK PETER A &
Name: {KATHLEEN E DULK:
[Address t IB LONG MEADOW ENT is LONG MEADOW LNN_| MEADOW LN N
ROTONDA WEST, FL
339471804
kag Sie Cad
7 JWACANT _|
[471998 rarer
[4/2005 } Taine nn
ra
Value Removed for!
Hurricane Damage:
sessed Values} $297,272 |
NOT values within this box are
T certified (final) values.
Consequently, they can change
tiodically as records are updated.
Amount of Taxes If Paid By...
a ee ee [iar 31]
82,342.94 Jf$2,367.34 | PRE SOE Ee al
Tax
Information _ |
1.12/02/05 °
To see your tax bill or pay it on-line click hete.
Building Information
oT
Ee bb aa
| Building Appendage Information
12” [Ceramie Tile GF a ile GF of %) 7
fos ecwiy em
sq a 8" |
-~g vy va
D000 On 832/474 1434/1357 1451/633 14851546 1591/12
STIS 15
Home ® Send Us Email
Copyright © 1997-2004 Charlotte County Property Appraiser, All toe reserved,
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT ir 4
mo * ABT 3_ PAGEH 33
Docket for Case No: 09-001156PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Apr. 09, 2009 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Apr. 09, 2009 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Apr. 08, 2009 |
Notice of Transfer.
|
Apr. 06, 2009 |
Joint Response to Pre-hearing Instructions filed.
|
Mar. 13, 2009 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Mar. 13, 2009 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for April 17, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
|
Mar. 11, 2009 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Mar. 04, 2009 |
Initial Order.
|
Mar. 04, 2009 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Mar. 04, 2009 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Mar. 04, 2009 |
Petition for Formal Hearing filed.
|
Mar. 04, 2009 |
Agency referral
|