Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Respondent: ARLENDER MILLER, D/B/A MS. ROOTER, INC.
Judges: PATRICIA M. HART
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Lauderdale Lakes, Florida
Filed: Apr. 01, 2009
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, September 9, 2009.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
OT 16 &O Py
STATE OF FLORIDA “ay AD
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH / 4,
. iQ:
Revocation of Septic Tank STATE HEALTH orien, 43
Contracting Authorization and ARAN Aye
Imposition of an Administrative Bureau of Water and ite
Penalty Sewage Programs,
HSEWOS
In the Matter of:
State of Florida,
Department of Health,
FILED
DEPARTMENT OF HE
Office of the Clg
AGENCY CLERK
paTe_-3BZ1922
Petitioner,
v.
Arlender Miller,
d/b/a, Ms. Rooter, Inc.
Respondent.
ee
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that twenty-one (21) days after
receipt of this Administrative Complaint, the Department of Health
intends to permanently revoke your license (which permitsyou to provide
septic tank contracting services) as well as impose an administrative fine
in the amount of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00). As of
this revocation, you are required to cease offering and providing septic
tank contracting services. As grounds in support thereof, the
Department alleges as follows:
(1) The Department, an agency of the State of Florida, has
jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Chapters 381.0065 and 489,
Administrative Complaint
State v. Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc.
Florida Statutes. The agency rule that governs this matter is Chapter
64E-6, Standards for Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems,
Florida Administrative Code.
(2) Respondent, Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc.
(hereinafter “Miller”), is a resident of the State of Florida conducting
business in Broward County.
(3) The Respondent provided septic tank contracting services at
2406 SW 4224 Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, to
Jaiman Deneshwar, owner of this property.
(4) As Ms. Rooter, Inc. is licensed by the Department to provide
septic tank contracting services and the property is located in Broward
County, Florida, this matter is within the jurisdiction of the Department.
FACTS
(5) On July 23, 2008, Respondent, entered into a contract with
a ten (10) year warranty with Jaimani Daneshwar to install a new
drainfield at the property referenced in paragraph 3 hereinabove. See
Exhibit “1.”
(6) Pursuant to the terms of the above-referenced contract, Mr.
Daneshwar agreed to pay Respondent the sum of Six Thousand Four
Hundred Dollars ($6,400.00) to Respondent for said installation. Mr.
Daneshwar paid Four Hundred Dollars ($400.00) of this sum in cash and
' the balance in two payments of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) each
Administrative Complaint
State v. Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc.
(see copies of checks dated July 23, 2008 and July 29, 2008 attached
hereto as Composite Exhibit “2”).
(7) On or about July 23, 2008, Miller installed the drainfield at
the subject property.
(8) Mr. Daneshwar has indicated to the Department that
approximately three (3) months after installation of the above drainfield,
the system failed.
(9) Mr. Daneshwar has further indicated that since the failure of
the drainfield, over a period of seven (7) days, he attempted more than
two (2) dozen telephone calls to Miller, however Miller either did not
answer these calls or failed to return calls from messages left by Mr.
Daneshwar.
(10) In October 2008, Mr. Daneshwar contracted with another
septic service company, Jimmy Mack Drainfields, to make the necessary
repairs to the subject drainfield.
(11) On November 13, 2008, Jimmy Mack Drainfields obtained a
repair permit to correct the drainfield issue at the subject property. See
Composite Exhibit “3”.
(12) A review of Department records on November 14, 2008
revealed that no permit for repair had been issued to Respondent relative
to the subject property in July 2008, nor, consequently, had an
inspection of the newly installed drainfield by Respondent been
conducted by the Department.
Administrative Complaint
State v. Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc.
(13) On December 13, 2002, Miller paid a One Thousand Dollar
($1,000.00) fine to the Department as the result of a complaint filed with
the Broward County Health Department by Mr. Albert Hinds relative to
his property located at 13540 SW 6th Court, Davie, Florida. Miller was
assessed said fine as a consequence of his receiving a citation from the
Department in 2000 for his repairing a septic system at Mr. Hinds’
property without having obtained a permit or the required inspection
from the Department. See Exhibit “4”.
(14) Additionally, the Miami-Dade County Health Department
and Monroe County Health Department have cited and taken action
against Miller on the following dates for the following violations:
a. On September 22, 1999, Miller was issued a Citation
for Violation by the Miami-Dade County Health Department for
completing contracted work without having been issued a permit,
for which Miller was fined One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). See
Exhibit “5”.
b. On December 21, 1999, Miller was issued a Citation
for Violation by the Miami-Dade County Health Department for
having repaired a sewage disposal system without having secured
a repair permit, for which Miller was fined. See Exhibit “6”.
Cc. On January 5, 2004, Miller was issued a Notice to
Cease and Desist, requiring him to cease and desist all septic tank
companies operating under his registration as a result of his
Administrative Complaint
State v. Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc.
advertising multiple septic companies under his registration. See
Exhibit “7”.
d. In April 2007, Miller paid a fine of Two Thousand Five
Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) for two fines as the result of a citation
issued in 2006 for having abandoned a contract to install a 500
gallon ATU, a 55 square foot filter box, and a 90 foot injection well
as well as providing contracting services without a valid
registration to do so. See Exhibit “8”.
(15) The Miami-Dade Health Department currently has a
Complaint pending before this tribunal as a result of Miller having been
cited for overcharging, for an unnecessary dosing tank that was never
installed, for deceit or negligence in not including costs in the contract
for a septic tank of sufficient capacity, deceit or neglect in failing to
install the minimum 2,575 gallon septic tank, and deceit or neglect by
installing equal size septic tanks.
DISCIPLINARY VIOLATIONS AND ACTION
_(16) The facts set forth hereinabove establish that the action by
Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc., and its principals, violated
Section 64E-6.022(1)(b)1, Florida Administrative Code, which provides in
pertinent part that a repeat violation relative to contracted work without
a permit having been issued, resulting in missed inspection or
inspections, shall result in a Five Hundred Dollar ($500.00) fine and a
ninety (90) day suspension or revocation of the contractor’s license
Administrative Complaint
State v. Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc.
(17} The facts set forth hereinabove establish that the action by
Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc., and its principals, violated
Chapter 64E-6.022(1)(f], Florida Administrative Code, which provides in
pertinent part that the punishment for the repeat violation of failing to
reasonably honor a written warranty is a Five Hundred Dollar ($500.00)
fine and a one year suspension or revocation of the contractor’s license.
(18) The facts set forth hereinabove establish that the action by
Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc., and its principals, violated
Chapter 64E-6.022(1)(k), Florida Administrative Code, which provides
that the result of repeat violations of practicing fraud or deceit, making
misleading or untrue representations is revocation of the contractor’s
license.
(19) The facts set forth hereinabove establish that the action by
Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc., and its principals, violated
Chapter 64E-6.022(1)(I)2, Florida Administrative Code, which provides
that a repeat violation of gross negligence, incompetence, or misconduct
which causes monetary or other harm to a customer requires a Five
Hundred Dollar ($500.00) fine and revocation of the contractor’s license.
(20) These violations are second occurrences and thereby subject
Respondent to a suspension of his license and the issuance of an
administrative fine.
Administrative Complaint
State v. Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc.
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING PROCESS
(21) The Respondent has a right to request an administrative
hearing pursuant to § 120.569(g) and 120.57, Florida Statutes; to be
represented by counsel or other qualified representative; to take
testimony, to call and cross-examine witnesses; to have subpoenas and
subpoenas duces tecum (production of records) issued; and to present
evidence or argument if she requests a hearing.
(22) (a) Any hearing request or answer to this Administrative
Complaint shall be made in writing and shall include the
following:
1. The name and address of the party making the
request, for purposes of service;
i. A statement that the party is requesting a
hearing involving disputed issues of material fact, or a
hearing not involving disputed issues of material fact;
- and
ili. A reference to the notice, order to show cause,
administrative complaint, or other communication that
the party has received from the agency.
(b) Except for good cause:
i. Factual matters alleged in this Compliant and
not denied in the Request for Hearing shall be
presumed admitted.
Administrative Complaint
State v. Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc.
i. Failure to raise a particular defense in the
Request for Hearing shall be considered a waiver of
that defense.
(23) This Administrative Complaint is issued pursuant to
§120.57, Florida Statutes. Any administrative proceedings concerning
this Complaint shall be conducted pursuant to Chapter 28-107.004,
Florida Administrative Code.
(24) The Respondent is given full notice of this agency action.
Failure to request a hearing within twenty-one (21) days after receipt of
this complaint will result in an admission of the facts alleged in this
Complaint and the entry of a Final Order by the Department. If the
Respondent desires to request a hearing, he/she may file a request
pursuant to paragraph 6 herein and forward the request to: Agency
Clerk, Department of Health, Office of the General Counsel, 4052 Bald
Cypress Way, BIN AO2, Tallahassee, Vi. wae 3.
\__ Pimoth ayer
Environmental Administrator
Broward County Health Department
Co Eh G.
Co TALL vor
“Judith C. Elfont, Esqvire
Department of Health
Broward County Health Department
780 SW 24 Street
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33315
Phone: (954) 467-4751
FAX: (954) 762-3645
Florida Bar No: 745146
Administrative Complaint
State v. Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE |
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
Administrative Complaint has been sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt
Requested to: Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter, Inc., 640 NW 129th
Street, Miami, Florida 33168; and Arlender Miller, d/b/a Ms. Rooter,
Inc., 3810 S. State Road 7 #B, Miramar, Fl 33023 on this 4% day of
February 2009.
Gatien Pefo—
Judith C. Elfont, Esq.
Docket for Case No: 09-001680
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Oct. 06, 2009 |
Objection to Respondent's Motion to Amend and/or to Correct Final Order filed.
|
Sep. 09, 2009 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Sep. 08, 2009 |
Motion to Issue Recommended Order Adopting Settlement Agreement of Parties and Dismissal of the Case filed.
|
Aug. 28, 2009 |
Order Granting Continuance and Placing Case in Abeyance (parties to advise status by September 10, 2009).
|
Aug. 28, 2009 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Held. |
Aug. 21, 2009 |
Order Granting Leave to File Third Amended Administrative Complaint.
|
Aug. 20, 2009 |
Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing) filed. |
Aug. 20, 2009 |
Pre-hearing Stipulation filed.
|
Jul. 30, 2009 |
Notice of Agreement to Extend Deadline to File Joint Stiplation of the Parties filed.
|
Jul. 30, 2009 |
Exhibits Attached to Motion to Accept Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jul. 30, 2009 |
Third Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jul. 30, 2009 |
Motion to Accept Third Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jul. 24, 2009 |
Notice of Unavailability filed.
|
Jun. 19, 2009 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for August 28, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Jun. 19, 2009 |
Notice of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel (of P. Eichner) filed.
|
Jun. 18, 2009 |
(Petitioner's) Motion for Continuance filed.
|
Jun. 02, 2009 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for August 7, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Jun. 02, 2009 |
Order Granting Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Administrative Complaint.
|
May 27, 2009 |
(Petitioner's) Motion for Continuance filed.
|
May 14, 2009 |
Second Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
|
May 14, 2009 |
Motion to Accept Second Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
|
May 12, 2009 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
May 12, 2009 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for June 17, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Apr. 24, 2009 |
Order Denying Motion to Dismiss.
|
Apr. 16, 2009 |
Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s Amended Request for Administrative Hearing Motion to Dismiss; Motion to Strike filed.
|
Apr. 13, 2009 |
(Petitioner`s) Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Apr. 09, 2009 |
Respondent`s Amended Request for Administrative Hearing Motion to Dismiss; Motion to Strike filed.
|
Apr. 01, 2009 |
Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Apr. 01, 2009 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Apr. 01, 2009 |
Letter to W. Deloatch, Jr., from R. Power regarding receipt of Request for Hearing filed.
|
Apr. 01, 2009 |
Respondent`s Request for Administrative Hearing, Motion to Dismiss; Motion to Strike filed.
|
Apr. 01, 2009 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|
Apr. 01, 2009 |
Initial Order.
|