Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: WILLIAM C. SLADE, JR., D/B/A SLA-TUR CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Judges: JUNE C. MCKINNEY
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: West Palm Beach, Florida
Filed: Feb. 02, 2010
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, April 14, 2010.
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2024
Feb 2 2010 13:12
g2/a2/2818 14:82 8589219186 DEPR PAGE @6/11
FILED
Bepartnent af Business and Professional Remulatior
Deputy Agency Clerk :
CLERK © Bratrden Nichola
Date 7716/2008
File #
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
DIVISION I
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Petitioner,
vs. Case No. 2008-054806
WILLIAM C. SLADE, JR., D/B/A
SLA-TUR CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL
REGULATION, (“Petitioner”), files this Administrative Complaint
before the Construction Industry Licensing Board, against
WILLIAM C. SLADE, JR., D/B/A SLA-TUR CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
(“Respondent”), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating
the practice of contracting pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida
Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.-
2. Respondent is, and has been at all times material
hereto, a Certified General Contractor, in the State of Florida,
license number CGC 6895, which is in current and active status.
3, Respondent’s address of record is 2610 N.B. 5° Ave.,
Pompano Beach, FL 33064.
Document in Unnamed i
Feb 2 2010 13:12
g2/a2/2818 14:82 8589219186 DEPR PAGE 7/11
4, At all times material hereto, Respondent was doing
business as and acting as the primary qualifying agent for Sla-
Tur Construction, Inc., (“Sla-Tur”).
5. Section 489.1195(1) (a), Florida Statutes, provides ~
that all primary qualifying agents for a business organization
are jointly and.equally responsible for supervision of all
operations of the business organization; for all field work at
all sites; and for financial matters, beth fer the organization
in general and for each specific job.
6. Sla-Tux does not possess a certificate of authority to
conduct business in the State of Florida as a construction
qualified business.
7. On or about June 12, 2007, Respondent, d/b/a Sla-Tur
entered into an agreement with homeowner Sue Karen Melvin
(“Complainant”) to construct a home addition at the residence
located at 19731 Boca Greens Drive, Boca Raton, FL 33498.
B. The contract price totaled $32,500.
9. On or about June 12, 2007, Respondent accepted 810,800
from Complainant as a deposit.
10. Respondent failed to commence work on the project.
11. Respondent failed to perform any additional work on
the project for a period greater than ninety (90) days.
12. Respondent failed to apply for building permits for
work om the project.
Document in Unnamed 2
Feb 2 2010 13:13
g2/a2/2818 14:82 8589219186 DEPR PAGE 8/11
13. Although Respondent failed to commence work on the
project, Respondent failed to refund any of the deposit money
accepted from Complainant.
COUNT_ONE
14. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through thirteen as though fully set
forth herein.
15. Section 489.126(2), Florida Statutes, states that a
contractor who receives, as an initial payment, money totaling
more than ten percent of the contract price for repair,
restoration, improvement or construction to residential real
property must apply for permits necessary to do work within 30
days after the date payment is made, except where the work does
not require a permit under the applicable codes amd ordinances,
“and must start work within 90 days after the date all necessary
permits for work, if any, are issued.
16. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section
439.129(1) (i), Florida Statutes, by failing in any material
respect to comply with the provisions of Chapter 489, Part I,
Florida Statutes, or violating a rule or lawful order of the
board, by having violated section 489.126(2), Florida Statutes.
COUNT TWO
17. Patitioner re-alleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through thirteen as though fully set
Document in Unnamed 3
Feb 2 2010 13:13
62/2/2618 14:02 8589219186 DEPR PAGE 89/11
forth herein.
18. Seeaetion 489.119(2), Florida Statutes, states in
relevant parts, that if the applicant proposes to engage in
contracting as a business organization, the business
organization must apply for a certificate of authority through a
qualifying agent.
19. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section
489.129(1) (i), Florida Statutes, by failing in any material
respect to comply with the provisions of Chapter 489, Part I,
Florida Statutes, or vicdlating a xwule or Jlawfyl order of the
board, by having violated Section 489.119(2), Florida Statutes.
20. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through thirteen as though fully set
forth herein.
21. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
489.129(1) (gq) @, Florida Statutes, by committing mismanagement
or misconduct in the practice of contracting that causes
financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or
misconduet occurs when the contractor has abandoned a customer's
job and the percentage of completion is less than the percentage
of the total contract price paid to the contractor ag of the
time of abandonment, unless the contractor is entitled to retain
such funds under the terms of the contract or refunds the excess
Document in Unnamed 4
Feb 2 2010 13:13
g2/a2/2818 14:82 8589219186 DEPR PAGE 18/11
funds within thirty (30) days after the date the job is
abandoned.
COUNT FOUR
22. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through thirteen as though fully set
forth herein.
23. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section
489.129(1) (4), Florida Statutes, by abandoning a construction
project in which the contractor is engaged or under contract as
a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days
if the contractor terminates the project without just cause or
without proper notification to the owner, including the reason
for termination, ot fails to perform work without just cause for
90 consecutive days.
COUNT FIVE
24. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through thirteen as though fully set
forth herein.
25. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section
489,129(1) (m), Florida Statutes, by committing incompetence or
mismanagement in the practice of contracting.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the
Construction Industry Licensing Board enter an Order imposing
one or more of the following penalties: place on probation,
Document in Unnamed 5
Feb 2 2010 13:13
g2/a2/2818 14:82 8589219186 DEPR PAGE 11/11
reprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or
renewal of the certificate of registration, require financial
restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to
exceed $10,000.00 per violation, require continuing education,
assess costs associated with the investigation and prosecution,
impose any or all penalties delineated within Section
455,.227(2), Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief the Board
is authorized to impose pursuant to Chapter 455 and 489, Florida
Statutes, and the rules promulgated thereunder.
Signed this 5° day of July, 2009.
CHARLES W. DRAGO, Secretary
Papartment of Business and
Professional Regulation
By: Paul R, Waters
Paul Waters
Assistant General Counsel,
Fl. Bar No. 817651
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
Office of the General Counsel
1940 N. Monroe Street,Ste. 42
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2202
PCP Date: 06/18/09
PCP Members: Evetts/Kane
PW/at
Document in Unnamed : 6
Docket for Case No: 10-000511
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Apr. 14, 2010 |
Order Relinquishing Jurisdiction and Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Apr. 07, 2010 |
Notice of Respondent's Non-compliance with Order to Show Cause filed.
|
Mar. 25, 2010 |
Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
|
Mar. 18, 2010 |
Order to Show Cause Why Petitioner`s Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction Should not be Granted.
|
Mar. 17, 2010 |
Petitioner's Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Mar. 03, 2010 |
Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
|
Feb. 09, 2010 |
Petitioner's Notice of Reservice of First Request for Admissions to Respondent filed.
|
Feb. 09, 2010 |
Counsel's Notice of Nonrepresentation of Slade filed.
|
Feb. 05, 2010 |
Petitioner's First Request for Admissions to Respondent filed.
|
Feb. 04, 2010 |
Order Directing Filing of Exhibits
|
Feb. 04, 2010 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Feb. 04, 2010 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for April 22, 2010; 1:00 p.m.; West Palm Beach and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Feb. 03, 2010 |
Petitioner's Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Feb. 02, 2010 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Feb. 02, 2010 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Feb. 02, 2010 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Feb. 02, 2010 |
Initial Order.
|