Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Respondent: EDGAR R. NAZARIO
Judges: J. D. PARRISH
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: St. Petersburg, Florida
Filed: Feb. 08, 2010
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, April 2, 2010.
Latest Update: Dec. 24, 2024
Feb 8 2010 15:26
By.
BPR OGA PAGE @4/ae
FILED
Department of Busines and Protectan Regulation:
Deputy Agency Clerk
a2/ar/2ala 1e:ae 8584146749
CLERK Brandon Nichols
Cnte 2/16/2008
File #
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
BOARD OF BUILDING CODE ADMINISTRATORS AND INSPECTORS
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Petitioner, LL
Vv. Case No. 2008-007045
EDGAR R. NAZARIO,
Respondent.
f
ig
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, Department Of Business And Professional
Regulation, ("Petitioner"), Files this Administrative Complaint
before the Board of Building Code Administrators and Inspectors,
against Edgar R. Nazario ("Respondent"), and alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating
the practice of building code administration and inspection
pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455
and 468, part XII, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent is and hag been, at all times material
hereto, @ licensed building code administrator in the State of
Florida, having been igsued license number BU 1440.
3. Respondent's last known address of record was 2203
Gladys Street, Largo, PL 33774.
GAOGC\Professions Boardstbullding coda\Libby Duffy's Law Clerks\AC\2008\Nazario, Edgar 0g-007045
(Nenad. dos
a2/ar/2ala 1e:ae 8584146749 DEPR OGA
Feb 8 2010 15:27
4. In 2007, a building permit was issued by the City of
St. Pete Beach puilding Department for the renovation of the
apartments at 1907 Gulf Way, which were severely damaged in 2004
by Hurricane Jean.
5. Complainant resided next-door to the damaged apartment
complex.
6. The .Respondent was the Building Official who approved
the permit for the renovation to the apartments.
7. The renovation of the building places Complainant's
home in the path of windborne and waterborne debris and also
places Complainant’s home in danger of future hurricane hazards
because of wind and storm surge,
8. Complainant sued the city ef St, Pete Beach in the
Sixth Judicial Cireuit, Circuit Court, Pinellas County, for the
improper issuance of the construction permit and was victorious
the suit. The court ruled that the City’s order for development
and renovation of ‘buildings damaged by Hurricane Jean had
expired on April 4, 2006 and any permit issued after said date
could not be the result of hurricane damage and must adhere to
the new standards.
9. The hurricane damage renovation permit here was issued
after April 4, 2006.
10. Recording to FEMA yules, the building was 4
catastrophic loss and should not have been renovated.
CF\OGC\ Professions Boards\building, code\Libby Duffy's Law Clerks\AC\W2008\Nazario, Edgar 08-007045 2
(WEKAC doe
PAGE @5/@8
Feb 8 2010 15:27
a2/ar/2ala 1e:ae 8584146749 DEPR OGA
PAGE
a6 /ae
11- The court held that since the renovation permit was
not obtained before April 4, 2006 the permit was improper and
the renovation permit should be nullified.
12. Additionally, the complainant hired Bracken
Engineering to review the renovation of the apartments. Bracken
Engineering identified numerous code violations during the
renovation construction of the apartment building.
13. Following an investigation by Pinellas County Building
and Development, the owner ef the apartment building applied for
a time extension for an expired permit, which was granted due to
the hurricane.
14. The extension would allow him to renovate the pbuilding
back to its original eondition; however, the renovation project
was exceeding the scope of the original permit by adding 200
extra square feet. This deviation from the original building
layout voided the permit and the owner was required to attain a4
new permit.
15. The owner of the apartment complex acquired a new
permit, which transformed the project from a renovation due te
hurricane damage To a project for substantial improvement.
16. Since the damage to the building exceeded 50% of the
value of the property, FEMA quidelines and Pinellas Gulf Beaches
Coastal Construction Codes applies along with the new
construction laws. FEMA guidelines classify the damage to the
GAOGC\Professions Reards\building code\Lihby Duffy's Law Clerks\ACA2008\Nazario, Edgar 08-007045 3
Chad. doc
Feb 8 2010 15:27
a2/ar/2ala 1e:ae 858414
: 6749 DEPR OGA
PAGE
ar /ae
apartment complex aS @ “complete loss” and a new permit should
never have been authorized for it.
17. In the expert opinien of John J. Yanoviak, reliable
evidence has been provided to corroborate the commission of
negligence and misconduct in the enforcement et rules,
regulations, and applicable building codes by Respondent.
18. Section 468.621(1) (g)- Florida Statutes, says: “The
following acts constitute grounds for which the disciplinary
actions in subsection (2) may be taken: failing to properly
enforee applicable pbuilding codes by committing willful
misconduct, gross negligence, gross misconduct, repeated
negligence, or negligence resulting in 4 significant danger te
life or property.”
19. Failing to adhere to FEMA or Florida Building Codes
when issuing construction permits | would constitute gross
negligence thai: establishes a significant danger to life or
property.
20. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 468.621(1) (9), Florida Statutes, by improperly issuing a
building permit for the apartment.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board of
Building Code Administrators and Inspectors enter an Order
imposing one or more of the following penalties: revocation or
suspension of Respondent’s license, restriction of Respondent's
GAOGC Professions Boarda\building, code\Libby Duffy's Law Clerks\AC\2008\Nazario, Edgar 08-007045 4
(NAC. doo
Feb 8 2010 15:27
a2/ar/2ala 1e:ae 8584146
: 749 DEPR OGA
PAGE @8/ae
practice, imposition of an administrative fine not to exceed
$5,000 per violation, issuance of a reprimand, placement of
Respondent on probation, assessment of costs association with
the investigation, imposition of any or all penalties delineated
within section 445.227(2), Florida Statutes, and/or any other
relief that the Board 4s authorized to impose pursuant to
chapters 455 and/or 468, Florida Statutes, and/or the rules
promulgated thereunder.
Signed this /O _ day of Eebeunry , 2009.
Blizabéth Fle r Duffy
Assistant General Counsel
Florida Bar No. 0980404
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
office of the General Counsel
1940 North Monroe Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202
Phone: (6850) 487-9648
Facsimile: (850) 414-6749
EFD/j1m
geo poet
GAOGC Professions Boards\building code\Libby Duffy's Law Clerks\ACWOORINazario, Edgar 08007945 5
(WE NAC. doe
Docket for Case No: 10-000551PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Apr. 02, 2010 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Apr. 01, 2010 |
Petitioner's Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Feb. 17, 2010 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Feb. 17, 2010 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for April 13, 2010; 9:00 a.m.; St. Petersburg and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Feb. 09, 2010 |
Initial Order.
|
Feb. 08, 2010 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Feb. 08, 2010 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Feb. 08, 2010 |
Agency referral filed.
|