Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs SANDRA BARNES, 10-007771TTS (2010)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 10-007771TTS Visitors: 49
Petitioner: BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Respondent: SANDRA BARNES
Judges: JOHN D. C. NEWTON, II
Agency: County School Boards
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Aug. 17, 2010
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, December 27, 2011.

Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2024
Aug 1? 2010 14:10 2010-08-17 14:40 >> 8509216847 =P 7/23 THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES F. NOTTER, as Superintendent of Schools, Petitioner, Vv. SANDRA BARNES, Respondent. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, James F. Notter, Superintendent of Schools (“Petitioner”), files this Administrative Complaint against, SANDRA BARNES (“BARNES”). The Petitioner seeks the termination of Respondent’s employment with The School Board of Broward County, Florida, pursuant to Sections 1001.51, 1012.27(5), and 1012.33, Florida Statutes. The Petitioner alleges the following: JURISDICTIONAL BASIS 1. The agency is The School Board of Broward County, Florida, (“SBBC”), which is located at 600 Southeast Third Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida 33301. The SBBC is a duly constituted school board charged with the duties to operate, control and supervise all public schools within the school district of Broward County, Florida, pursuant to Article IX § 4(b), Fla. Const. 2. Petitioner is the Superintendent of Schools for The School Board of Broward County, Florida. 3. Petitioner is statutorily obligated to recommend the placement of school personnel Aug 1? 2010 14:10 2010-08-17 14:41 >> 8509216847 =P 8/23 and to require compliance and observance with all laws, rules and regulations. Petitioner is authorized to report and enforce any violation thereof, together with recommending the appropriate disciplinary action against any instructional personnel employed by The School Board of Broward County, Florida. 4. Respondent was employed at all times material herein, by The School Board of Broward County, Florida, as a teacher pursuant to a Continuing Contract, pursuant to Fla. Stat. 1012.33(4) and holds a Florida Educational Certificate Number: 364225, MATE L ALLEGATIONS 5. The school district has implemented a performance assessment system in conformity with Section 1012.34, Florida Statutes known as Instructional Personnel Assessment System (IPAS”). 6. On May 25, 2010, Respondent was issued the attached unsatisfactory IPAS noting four (4) key areas: Lesson Presentation, Student Performance Evaluation, Behavior Management and Records Management. This IPAS followed the completion of the attached Performance Development Plan (“PDP”) during the 2009/2010 school year during which time Respondent was given assistance and remedial suggestions following observations of her classroom performance. 7, Respondent’s employment with the school district commenced on October 5, 1976, where she was assigned to Flamingo Elementary School. On April 20, 1978, Respondent’s evaluation for the 1977/1978 school year noted professional assistance to the Respondent was required to assist in helping her to structure her program. 8. The Respondent’s evaluation for the 1982/1983 school year noted the Respondent’s performance deficiencies in classroom and time management. Aug 1? 2010 14:11 2010-08-17 14:41 >> 8509216847 =P 9/23 9. In the 1997/1998 school year the Respondent requested and was granted a transfer to Pembroke Lakes Elementary School. 10, On March 23, 1998, Respondent was given a memo from the Principal advising her that she would be placed on a PDP for the 1997/1998 and 1998/1999 school years, following assistance to correct her noted performance deficiencies. The noted areas of deficient performance included instructional planning, lesson management, lesson presentation, student performance evaluation, communication, classroom management, behavioral management, records management, subject matter knowledge and professional competencies, 11. On June 26, 1998, Respondent received an IPAS noting five (5) areas of. performance which required improvement, These areas involved lesson management, lesson presentation, classroom management, behavior management and subject matter knowledge. 12. On July 1, 1998, Respondent requested a transfer which was not granted, During the ensuing school years, Respondent’s performance deficiencies were noted on more then one (1) occasion. 13, On October 16, 2000, a Post Observation Conference was held by the principal with the Respondent and her union representative, The Respondent was advised of her performance deficiencies in the following areas: assessments, planning and implementation of effective, instructional methods/groups to meet the needs of the students, support student achievement, implementation of classroom procedures and daily routines taught are reinforced and, timely and appropriate review of student’s work and specific written feedback, The Respondent was advised that an observation would be held at the end of the first quarter, and without noted improvernent, the Respondent would be placed on a PDP. Four (4) days later, the Respondent scheduled a substitute to Aug 1? 2010 14:11 2010-08-17 14:41 >> 8509216847 =P 10/23 cover her classes for the next seven (7) days. Respondent thereafter went on a Farnily Medical Leave of Absence from November 1, 2000 through February 12, 2001. 14. Respondent's principal noted, in a written memorandum to her director on November 13, 2000, that it was not in the best interest of the students for Respondent to return to the classroom. The principal also noted it would be unfair for the Respondent to return to the second graders who now have been meeting with academic success for the first time this school year due to the teaching ofa highly effective interim substitute, The principal noted that since the Respondent’s absence, the principal has not had the multitude of parental calls, letters and concems regarding their child’s lack of academic achievement. The principal expressed that the parents are anxious and concemed regarding what happens when the Respondent returns to the classroom. 15. Upon the expiration of her medical leave, the Respondent requested a Personal Leave of Absence for the remainder of the school year preventing the completion of the PDP and IPAS, Respondent thereafter requested and was granted a transfer to Coconut Palm Elementary School in February of 2001, 16. On the second day of school, Respondent was observed in a classroom fining up students for lunch. Fifteen (15) minutes later, the Respondent was still attempting to line up the students for lunch. 17. After lunch, on the same day, Respondent was observed counting her students in the hallway outside the cafeteria. When questioned, Respondent explained that a student was missing and she sent a paraprofessional to retrieve the grade book so she could call roll to determine the missing student. Later that day, a parent observed the Respondent walk out to the car pool after school with only seven (7) children. The parent’s child was not among them. When questioned, the Aug 1? 2010 14:11 2010-08-17 14:42 >> 8509216847 =P 11/23 Respondent told the parent to “check the media center.” The child was found by the parent wandering among the fifth graders. 18. The following day another parent complained that her son had not eaten a snack or lunch the previous two (2) days. The Respondent was asked to point out the student but was unable to do so without checking several name tags until she located the student in question. Respondent further stated that she was unaware if the child had eaten or not, or even ifhe got into the lunch line. 19. The next day the Respondent was observed distributing lunch numbers to hang around the student’s necks. Respondent did not know the children and the process took an inordinate amount of time causing the class to be unruly. The assistant principal, in the absence of Respondent’s effective classroom management, took over the class and passed out the numbers. 20. A conference was held with the Respondent and the principal on September 15, 2002 to discuss numerous concerns. One of the concerns was the Respondent’s refusal to tie the kindergarten student’s shoelaces. Respondent instructed the students to “ust tuck them in your shoes.” During this conference, Respondent blurted out that she didn’t lose a student, but the student had changed his seat. Evidently, Respondent had misplaced a student, which was unknown to the administration. Respondent was also unable to provide a satisfactory explanation why a missing student was found under a lunch table by the cafeteria monitors. Observations of the Respondent’s classroom performance were conducted throughout the remainder of the school year and assistance was provided in an attempt to improve Respondent’s performance. 21. — This pattem continued into the 2003/2004 school year where several conferences were held to discuss the observation of Respondent’s lesson presentation, lesson plans and other assistance rendered to the Respondent. Aug 1? 2010 14:11 2010-08-17 14:42 >> 8509216847 =P 12/23 22. On February 12, 2004, a conference was held with the Respondent and her union Tepresentative concerning the February 2, 2004 observation, During this conference, Respondent’s deficiencies in classroom and behavioral management were discussed, Respondent’s performance was thereafter followed through observations and assistance. 23. On April 13, 2004, the administration decided to place the Respondent on a PDP, which because of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, was unable to be completed prior to the end of the school year. 24. On June 2, 2004, the Respondent’s IPAS was issued, Respondent was required pursuant to the Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”) to be issued a satisfactory performance evaluation. However, the principal noted that the Respondent needed to work on classroom management, organizational skills and lesson planning. Respondent thereafter filed a grievance to have these comments removed from her IPAS. 25. During the 2006/2007 school year, the Respondent had two (2) students injured on the playground. Respondent did not timely send the students for medical treatment, or file a timely report. Numerous parent complaints and requests for withdrawal of their children from the Respondent’s classroom continued. One incident involved the Respondent belittling a student by calling him “the dumbest kid in my class.” 26. During the 2008/2009 school year, the Respondent was removed from teaching Kindergarten due to numerous complaints made by parents. The parents also expressed that Respondent was an ineffective teacher. Aug 1? 2010 14:12 2010-08-17 14:42 >> 8509216847 =P 13/23 27. During the 2008/2009 school year, numerous incidents were brought to the Respondent's attention concerning her interaction with administration, staff, parents and students, including but not limited to the following: A. Respondent’s refusal to attend field trips, field days, or team-sponsored events which isolated her students. B. Respondent’s failure to follow standard protocols for bathroom breaks. Respondent was issued a memorandum on September 19, 2008 to cease this pattern of behavior and was directed to contact the front office to request a break. Respondent refused this directive and instead left the students unsupervised when she went to take her bathroom break. Cc. Respondent refused to comply with the mandated requirements for fifteen (15) minutes of structured recess for her students. Instead, Respondent would have a second grader carry a chair outside for her to sit on so she could watch the students conduct an unstructured recess. One student was injured while carrying this chair. 28. — Respondent’s ineffective teaching methods during this period becarne apparent to administrators, parents and faculty. Respondent engaged in conflict or confrontation with other teachers over a number of issues. 29. The assessment data in January, 2009 revealed that ten (10) out of Respondent's eighteen (18) students had not moved from a pre-primer level since September 17, 2008. Five (5) of the eight (8) students only showed a minimal progress. A review of her student’s progress for the 2007/2008 school year depicted that fifty (50%) percent of the student’s scores decreased, 30. When brought to her attention, Respondent wrote a rebuttal to state that ninety (90%) Aug 1? 2010 14:12 2010-08-17 14:43 >> 8509216847 =P 14/23 percent of her students did not pass their AR tests because she only had one (1) white student who was from Hungary. The Respondent's demographics were identical to those of her colleagues. 31, Thereafter, Respondent was observed and given assistance during February and March. On February 12, 2009, a substitute filling in for the Respondent found that her lesson plans contained math pages that didn’t correspond with the comprehension page. Further, Respondent’s lesson plan did not include approved Broward County curriculum. Instead, Respondent used non- approved materials. 32. A review of the Respondent’s grade books on April 1, 2009 noted a number of discrepancies in completion of thesereports. Students had been assigned grades without conferring with the other reading teachers. Numerous report cards had identical grades, Several grades were missing from the grade books and no grade averages were indicated in the grade books. Respondent was unable to provide any explanation how she arrived at the grades other than through her observation. Respondent was required to re-do the grade book and report cards for the second quarter and was directed to follow protocol. Respondent failed to do so. 33, During this conference, it was brought to the Respondent’s attention that during one of the observations, a student complained of an injury to her arm. Respondent, without looking at the student, dismissed the student’s complaint and stated “go sit down you will be fine.” 34, On April 3, 2009, the Respondent was notified of a conference scheduled for Apri! 16, 2009 to formulate a PDP. Respondent thereafter applied for and was granted a leave of absence for the remainder of the school year. Upon her return for the 2009/2010 school year, a conference was held with the Respondent and her BTU Representative to initiate a PDP. On September 17, Aug 1? 2010 14:13 2010-08-17 14:43 >> 8509216847 =P 15/23 2009, Respondent left students unsupervised after being given a directive by her principal. The Respondent retorted that she was in the copy room doing her Progress Reports. 35. On October 16, 2009, a conference with the Respondent and the BTU was held to discuss the Respondent’s performance deficiencies and formulate a PDP through May 2010. 36. On February 5, 2010, the Respondent once again failed to timely issue Interim Reports. The Respondent claimed that she was confused about the instruction for completing an Interim Report Card. 37, On February 25, 2010, Respondent failed to provide appropriate supervision and protection to a first grade student. While proceeding to the front door of the school for dismissal, Respondent lost track of a newly enrolled student. The student was found wandering, scared, distraught and lost in a vacant hallway by another teacher. Respondent accepted no responsibility for her action, and instead blamed the student and his mother. A similar incident occurred on October 28, 2009 when Respondent left a first prader unsupervised on the playground when she returned to the classroom. Another teacher found the student on the playground following the Respondent's recess period. The Respondent was issued a written reprimand as a result of the October 2009 incident, In the reprimand, Respondent was advised the following: Please be advised that any further failure on your part to perform to the standards established for the effective and productive performance of your job duties as a teacher will result in further disciplinary action, up to and including termination of your employment. The Respondent submitted a written rebuttal faulting the “numerous interruptions in and out of the class,” and claimed the interruptions were “disparate treatment and harassment.” 38. On June 16, 2010, Respondent’s principal forwarded the attached IPAS to the Aug 1? 2010 14:13 2010-08-17 14:43 >> 8509216847 =P 16/23 Superintendent with a recommendation that the Respondent’s employment be terminated with The School Board of Broward County, Florida. Notice was provided to the Respondent by the Petitioner of his request that The School Board of Broward County, Florida terminate Respondent's employment contract. ADMINIST. IVE CHARGES 39. The following charges are brought against the Respondent, predicated on the foregoing factual allegations, pursuant to Fla, Stat. 1012.33(4)(c), Respondent’s Employment Contract, School Board Rules and Regulations and 6B-4.009 of the Florida Administrative Code, including but not limited to the following: COUNT 1: INCOMPETENCY 40. Respondent has violated Fla. Stat. § 1012.33(4)(c), and Rule 6B-4.009(1) of the Florida Administrative Code. Respondent is incompetent to perform her contractual obligation by reason of her inability or lack of fitness to discharge her required duty as a result of inefficiency or incapacity as defined in Rule 6B-4.009(1). COUNT 2: GROSS INSUBORDINATION/WILLFUL NEGLECT OF DUTIES 41. Respondent’s aforedescribed actions in refusing to obey a direct order(s) which were reasonable in nature and given by and with proper authority is violative of Fla, Stat. 1012.33(4)(c) and Rule 6B-4.009(4) of the Florida Administrative Code. 10 Aug 1? 2010 14:13 2010-08-17 14:44 >> 8509216847 =P 17/23 COUNT 3: MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE 42. Respondent has violated Fla, Stat. 1012.33(4)(c) and Rule 6B-4.009(3) of the Florida Administrative Code. Respondent’s acts are defined as a violation of the Code of Ethics of the Educational Profession as adopted in Rule 6B-1.001 F.A.C. and of Principles of Professional Conduct for the Educational Provisions in Florida, as adopted by Rule 6B-1.006, F.A.C., which are 80 serious so as to impair the individual's effectiveness in the school system, which includes the following: (3) Obligation to the student requires that the individual: (a) shall make a reasonable effort to protect the student from conditions harmful to learning and/or to the student's mental and/or physical health and/or safety. (b) shall not unreasonably restrain a student from independent action in pursuit of learning. (c) shall not unreasonably deny a student access to diverse points of view. (2) shall not intentionally suppress or distort subject matter relevant to a student’s academic program. (ec) shall not intentionally expose a student to unnecessary embarrassment or disparagement. @ shall not intentionally violate or deny a student’s legal rights. 43. This Administrative Complaint is brought pursuant to the authority outlined in Fla. Stat. §§ 120.57; 1001.42: 1012.22; 1006.07; 1006.28; 1006.21; 1001.50; 1001.49; 1001.51; 1012.27; 1006.08; 1012.33(1)(a); 1012.34 and Chapters 6B-1 and 6B-4 of the Florida Administrative Code. il Aug 1? 2010 14:13 2010-08-17 14:44 >> 8509216847 =P 18/23 DEMAND FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, Petitioner, James F. Notter, Superintendent of Schools, recommends the dismissal of the Respondent, SANDRA BARNES, from her employment with The School Board of Broward County, Florida, based upon the foregoing facts and legal authority. Petitioner further recommends the immediate suspension of Respondent without further pay or benefits in the event the Respondent should challenge The School Board's decision to terminate her employment. EXECUTED this 20 — day of June, 2010. JAMES F. NOTTER Superintendent of Schools THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared by Charles T. Whitelock, P.A. 12 Aug 1? 2010 14:14 2010-08-17 14:44 >> 8509216847 =P 19/23 Broward County Public School District, Florida . Instructional Personnel Assessment System v C. Employee: Sandra Barnes |senoo! Yeux 2009-10 | ype of Ascesement: $ - Satisfactory 2 g School: Coconut Palm Elem | Personnel # — tgsig [Contract Status: Development RaunS | N-Needs Improvement |.“ ° Date Collection Dates: 8/09-6/10 | Aseessor — T. Thelinas, Principal | pocumentation’| _* | U- a y 2 ‘ornvance: Areas: Instructional Personnel Performance Indicators |Rating _| if 1 \s. & ‘Develops lesson plane and selects Bevel: ops Jesson plang which reflect the Relates instructional elements such ag O° a instructional materials and activities whieh) precequisite knowledge, skille, and gontent, materials, aelivities, formal, Oo + reflect the district’s curriculum acape and adit f students. a goals to Identified student needs, Instructional sequence and identified leamery’ needs, | ns= of turer “nee nese Oo Planning Specifies learner objectives and relates Speelfies the steps, it ili and Identifies and sequences content. Wiese to the instructional activity. pating of etudent acthvities appropriate: EN 4 their needa and the content 4 D : SETI =m neaeRee ‘ Soleets and usea appropriate ingtesetional |” uf ech technique: including available materials | Emphasizes what is impottant to aie cations whl oh ae clear and and technology which support leaning torember, tesponding Lesson of the specific types of knowledge or Presentation Uses different types of questions te obtain Circulates about the room as students desired Jeamer responses. engage in seatwork and asslate students . as needed, par aeenerid aasponses to queslitnt| views student wade and provides ely Gives cleat, beled, and expileit directions and cheeks forunderitanding, Presents connected or associated and thoughe, Uses correct grammar in written and oral sommunicabiare. Communicates leamer elatug and . ays progress to parents in order to maintain Demonstrates basic mechanits af writing: | 3 positive, collaborative retationship. spelling capitalization, and punctuation. | Additionally, esminunicater leatmay ttatus and progress to the student and other professionala, Communication Expressed Interest and exeltement through verbal and nonverbal behavior, paki ae Demonstrates an awareness of what all students are doing Establishes and implements apecifie behavioral and procedural expectations, Behavior Management rales, and consequences, Stops inappropriate behavior before it apreads or becomes more carious, E 7 _ renee é Subj lect Matter Precurts securate information, Recognizes and promotes the relationship romecnnr oxgenixes and presents : } of the subject with the school’s curriculum. | content forthe spe ubjest, 4 , Kogelede (a i : : a) Fan TERA he Hi “ - Needs Improvement Overall Performance Rating] §- Satisfactory tanmel sonbact teachers only) U- Unsatisfactory [mw [eo f : £ Assessor ° < = eee < ont Oars et meas on ee iW, Dope ns ii € Yao.g yg, We op SoA ee cenit Same ord CO : Suge ee oy ahs CORES era A SS ‘ Aug 1? 2010 14:15 8509216847 =P 20/23 >> 2010-08-17 14:46 mn, Gay a coo boanud PLN a ee fore 9 Beeradene Sot ease hoo SOUP IIO. Sgro : a enee bo S058 ot Soe as si ENS = c of ao} - pl. a ot atetcae ee AS en DoACIGUIT poten wap ar te Aytysithsd Uonplp iI eb OVE Y Sr ie 2d a aye Sabie sup ‘tn kes, ¥. G ape ree idakopluie ayy so SspuawWES jeuOHTf a “SORT TIES cisle § oNSfE —wo-ugy ins nosdesse OY} JO SJUSWUWIOS PHUCHIPpY DP tt aye ZF t / ONS fe _ite | ce andi Ges en ae eed mati VIO DDH Op. JOVIGOIY TP Wowie poapotiblyy CPHOR tHe. sseuBon peacudde pieog je uo Ajepy yA ayy pode: pus sesso) 2 sue swepns Auep) Aedoud 01 sazzinb 'y jsa] WoossEp ‘eyEp juUSSEssE Ago Asn || SauEg “SIjy Crs, 74 th *paeu 1 Suepns jo eBeleae apes juepnys qusuns joatfel PUB ISLEEU ASU @ Ut aUOp aq [A sUodes WSU] ueed so pus ey) YBnous, paurpUlEW ag | yOoqapelh ey) Woy y1OM papers jo sardog ‘JEepug|eg snsoy pewayanysut ret gy ce VSON. POON Vo 1% nd yoy st corpse ef CoLd f! 40 2% Leg pleby “PRAUCS JO LOHEUILWS] JO pug uoleNjeAy S¥dl Aiojpeysyesun ue UW! NSeI TIAA 7US|ONSP SB PSL HUSp] Sear je apeypewal 6) /ESN}e! 16 uN{!e] 16) sssuanbssuog “eaue jelans e& UI ssaGerd ShyS pue sbpe/AOUy |SUePNis ENpALpU! Buipiocal Jo} aysAs © UreIUIEy , yooq epe.6 pus upd ucsse] eyep-o}-dn 1 ep BSJEPURU SUL MONO! [IA SOLE “Say DASSASSE Ole TU] SNS s1OEds loeyey FM YOOqaPEID pue ‘ajeunsee ‘peziuBBre ue upIuEr) . “OROS ‘Ph Aeyy UBnouy a”, ated “bom . PW {3S aa Aq papiaoid ag [lA eourlsissy +O] SHEY seLoRE | uo Buinuiues pure o1oe ‘rayenb yoea 19) sapei6 pawes jo aBeleae ayy jaye. ln SapeuB prea podas wapns ‘ZL Yue Aq SepUEep Paluepe jo Arje3 yy “sounpesoud Burpes6 ype ase|ael qi Sr. ANSASSYNYA SOdoCodHy . ———— Ti Ambon, * saul i Ais (ee see : a oe fe ; WS _ovenig @ eet fedbOUL - SEWWI@L) Psera) ABILEWAIA WEY uesog Srari ” Saweg BIPUES a1 Moa sdn-moyos) UBle SIYT JO e7Eq Jossessy loys] # leuuoSsied . sakopdwy yo euep : SLU C|oAaC SO rz O1IS4 BpHoly Joujsiq pooyos sand Ajun PieMolg Aug 1? 2010 14:16 8509216847 =P 21/23 >> 2010-08-17 14:46 , Sey we ss Lae & “appa NS TN ie eat Rae . a yop u » OR IS Ks od : Bui, oot SHS: oyr6a4 ; ee ite fuer . ; } - he fre xg” ee Se bt 22 Hp ye pomtpuo? 4° neal Yegp “tee! pL Ge WHT & SB6GLM. - rit] r AS RAMS WIA AO, x. Las plea awa a. 28: EI "aru buy waplad eer WA tp hoae aes Tyimeg ye Lejane? Sg a Z rit yp perbepy T - A, - : F Sa opel FRA ® Age SU] JO STUSLUOD teuont py “JoRUNS 40 UOEUTWJe] Jo pue uOENeAS . iis 7 iE S¥di Loe syesun ue urynsel [IM ° bY OL: 7 a ! Ly (Ee pes at 1USISHSD SE PAHNUSP] Stee [je ayerpeu: “Ls 4 4 s ie HOBSOSSE ay} JO SIUSINUIOS UOT IPDY OMesnjal to aunye}) 20) saouanbesues Sooo Sa ~ paprnoud oq jimh SOUBISISSY “yELUBOUOJUIE! Srusod Jo asn esBOLOLN AA SALTER “Su OfY" “Ausiesiue tenis pupsscug “JO|A2Yaq Wwapis saysod equopuisy , aWeBeUe A) IOIAZ US “SROUOS ero SBLUOoSG JO speaids Y Si0jeq JolABYyad ependoudden dos , ‘ueld AOWEyeg epi jooYos ol) BZA I[IM SAweEg “Supy it . ‘Bulop ae siuapnys pe . “ssouanbesuce ayeudodde aa6 pue sionpuoasiw We ISIseN | SBUEG ‘SULA Hie Jey JO ssauaieme UP S]EysuOWed , Li . gOPS Seber -aA 2 iin AGoptes <7 “WUD} VOWTENS|A WOOIssPID 1) Bus “saquenbasuns pure ‘san T 2 = *suioneyedxe jeunpeoold pue poloweyeq pawn pure — “ oypads juswe|dul, Bue ysijqeysy , “BLOz "H-FeHy YBNI, * SOLU, Gob »yoeqpes? opioid ple aAlesge IV OTS YP FAG * A . 0} Sey ss yore uo Guinunuce pure Loz Taw pet : "EL yore Aq semusloyen “saduanbesuos PayuEp! jo Ua,sE ly BUE SPEMNG SPNPOUl OL UB ey JIABYSR SBUIER “SIA MALAGU [IM ey OLAy Say, . Hii LNA YN HOIAVHIG i = ats i as = Be Eh ie of f&Efyt . towstt Ag Bore Os yediouyg - SeWjeyL PSaeL AB USWOA WEY NUEDOD Srarl . ; Seung PIpUBS ape aaney sdremojjog) UPd S14} so ayaq scssessy| leoyo5 | =F uUoslag . sakopdwig Jo suey qd JUaWIdO|aAeg SoUBLUIOLS, BPO]. ‘FOISIG joouaS Sqn, Alun = Puemoug Aug 1? 2010 14:16 8509216847 =P 22/23 >> 2010-08-17 14:47 agopnes Kid MANNS wo Be Ssh S6GE LAL 47u jet Tao? ee ‘ae ewe al pe bao sires te ye ae exper reed db ai Hg 2, taut tt ib nib dian david 12 Te : | \ 9 Pee pets pet f reehoduse at $9 SUSUTWCS jBUOT bp y FRIED JO UOHEUIULS] JO pue ay sossesay Py f Sf a LORenPAA Syid{ ACE pSIESUN USE. In, Ym, ¢ ensle ° Pe ae f 4 NLGOYOP SE PSY UApt Seaue [je ayerpauiad olsfe are MOSSASSE ou JO SUSU ey} 0) JBSNjSu 10 Gun|[e} 153 sasuanbasucg f LF ty Ae) a, 1 paper fit Sp ans sos 49 OHO ey Sf C_LL ane Sale ee i ~ . re alentens le pote ag argsye ab “to hey ry) aa PORE wre were pret tuk ye papf Pa. ao bas ted reg Si FE f t TF “OLOZ 4etteyy UBnouyy Uo Buinugues pue OLGZ ‘Zh Ueyy Aq sapueyep «GR Son cnet foepns we SN gor™ eae ea Says os OF, ORE pe rude poopy 1g wives paiiby wyevip (919 ‘lu| “HY "HYLS) Jepuepes weussesse s,/D0Yos SU) MOlIO} JIM SSURG ‘SI - “WOHONSU: drove yes Jo) epep quepngs Guisn ul is|ss2 lala UO ]S@9p0q WOlTan]suy vas BYEQ Sy) MeIAS! IMA SALW “SITY Dando: se Sees] “Urey puz ‘Supeay UF UONOMISU! ABPOU Oo} sazzinb 9 yJOM Ajep asn eco bon) Seer eyep Aq sdnev6 Guipees Aupoul Ajenuucs [jin sewed “Su A ssa Aq paplacsd aq |i SOURISISsy "Speen Japs /EnpIAIpul vA Poh = ogon IVSE ga 4 pag need Gly FE J “umole SJBeA aud Aq Spuepuels Lojeonpy JoqsWLedsg US peseg suet swepeas MOYS ‘AWK ‘OUISI Pub Beze ‘aoz UolEAOULT '}OoYos euL Aq PSysyqeisa SeAIS[QO pus SPIEPUELS JUBWEASTYSE Buuleye ul! ssaufoid ruspms sous , +O} SHE} iyo] NOLLYMTYAA peyAuap) jo arse py 0} UOHOMISIN SjeqUeLeYIp 0} suL|d UOSSO| Arpow ILM Seuleg “S14 ‘s}eyS BIEp uC paseg SONVRINOSHad INFONLS ; . : : : a BEE batalla “oLcas Aq fectouy g ~sewjeyy esse, ~ AEMeWelS WIRE INUESED rere seureg eupues eqeg aoeusdn-mojjoy) UPI S141 10 aye sossessy Jooyss | # jeuuosueg sosopduy jo oweN d JUSLUCO/aAag SIUBLUIOIOd PPUOL UISIG joouss oiqng Ajun paemolg Aug 1? 2010 14:17 8509216847 =P 23/23 >> 2010-08-17 14:48 { Bauer am “OLOg ere uBreau, uo Sumuquos 9 O10e ‘2b Usueyy Aq sajouapyep Paynuap! so Arsysepy _obstantg S76 Mopaay s dn-moi] SI Tr /$

Docket for Case No: 10-007771TTS
Issue Date Proceedings
Dec. 27, 2011 Order Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
Dec. 22, 2011 Rerspondent's Notice of Waiver filed.
Dec. 19, 2011 Notice of Service of Respondent's Response to Petitioner's Request for Admissions filed.
Dec. 14, 2011 Order Extending Date for Filing Pre-hearing Stipulation.
Dec. 14, 2011 Petitioners' Joint Response to Respondent's Motion for Continuance/Petitioners' Request for Pre-trial Stipulation (filed in Case No. 11-005634PL).
Dec. 14, 2011 Petitioners' Joint Response to Respondent's Motion for Continuance/Petitioners' Request for Pre-trial Stipulation filed.
Dec. 13, 2011 Order Denying Continuance of Final Hearing.
Dec. 12, 2011 Motion for Continuance filed.
Dec. 12, 2011 Order of Pre-hearing Order.
Dec. 09, 2011 CASE STATUS: Pre-Hearing Conference Held.
Dec. 01, 2011 Notice of Re-scheduling of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for December 9, 2011; 2:00 p.m.).
Nov. 30, 2011 Respondent's Unopposed Motion to Reset Pretrial Conference filed.
Nov. 17, 2011 Notice of Transfer.
Nov. 17, 2011 Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 10-7771TTS and 11-5634PL).
Nov. 16, 2011 Joint Motion to Consolidate filed.
Nov. 08, 2011 Respondent's Unopposed Motion Rescinding Order on Petitioner's Motion for Protective Order filed.
Nov. 04, 2011 Notice of Cancelation of Deposition (Laquita Lee, Sefanie Alvord and AnnMarie Bolivar) filed.
Nov. 04, 2011 Notice of Cancelation of Deposition (Tamara Osborne, Toni Weissberg and Donald Gardner) filed.
Nov. 04, 2011 Notice of Cancelation of Deposition (Terri Thelmas and Marsha Wagner) filed.
Nov. 04, 2011 Notice of Cancelation of Deposition (Dildra Martin-Ogbum) filed.
Oct. 25, 2011 Re-Notice of Taking Depositions (Terri Thelmas, Marsha Wagner, Tamara Osborne, Donald Gardner, Toni Weissberg, Laquita Lee, AnnMarie Bolivar, Stefanie Alvord, and Dildra Martin-Ogburn) filed.
Oct. 12, 2011 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Protective Order filed.
Oct. 12, 2011 Protective Order.
Oct. 06, 2011 Order to Respond to Petitioner's Motion for Protective Order/Motion for Sanctions.
Oct. 06, 2011 Petitioner's Motion for Protective Order/Motion for Sanctions filed.
Sep. 14, 2011 Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for December 9, 2011; 9:30 a.m.).
Sep. 14, 2011 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Sep. 14, 2011 Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for January 10 through 12, 2012; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL; amended as to Date, time and location of hearing).
Aug. 26, 2011 Respondent's Notice of Availability filed.
Aug. 17, 2011 Respondent's Unopposed Motion for Continuance filed.
Aug. 11, 2011 Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for September 26, 2011; 2:00 p.m.).
Jul. 20, 2011 Order on Amended Motion in Limine.
Mar. 30, 2011 Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Amended Motion in Limine filed.
Mar. 16, 2011 Amended Motion in Limine filed.
Mar. 08, 2011 Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for August 29, 2011; 9:00 a.m.).
Mar. 08, 2011 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for September 6 through 9, 2011; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
Mar. 07, 2011 Joint Motion to Continue Hearing filed.
Mar. 03, 2011 Order Denying Respondent`s Motion in Limine.
Mar. 02, 2011 Motion in Limine filed.
Jan. 06, 2011 Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for March 31, 2011; 10:30 a.m.).
Jan. 06, 2011 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for April 11 through 14, 2011; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
Jan. 05, 2011 Unopposed Motion for Continuance filed.
Oct. 12, 2010 Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for January 10, 2010; 11:00 a.m.).
Sep. 20, 2010 Notice of Service of Respondent's Request for Production of Documents and Things filed.
Sep. 20, 2010 Notice of Service of Respondent's First Set of Interrogatories to Petitioner filed.
Aug. 27, 2010 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for January 24 through 28, 2011; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
Aug. 27, 2010 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Aug. 24, 2010 Order to Show Cause why Jurisdiction Should Not be Relinquished.
Aug. 18, 2010 Initial Order.
Aug. 17, 2010 Administrative Complaint filed.
Aug. 17, 2010 Recommendation for Termination of Continuing Contract filed.
Aug. 17, 2010 Agenda Request Form filed.
Aug. 17, 2010 Request for Administrative Hearing filed.
Aug. 17, 2010 Referral Letter filed.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer