Petitioner: BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Respondent: SANDRA BARNES
Judges: JOHN D. C. NEWTON, II
Agency: County School Boards
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Aug. 17, 2010
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, December 27, 2011.
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2024
Aug 1? 2010 14:10
2010-08-17 14:40 >> 8509216847 =P 7/23
THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
JAMES F. NOTTER, as Superintendent of
Schools,
Petitioner,
Vv.
SANDRA BARNES,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, James F. Notter, Superintendent of Schools (“Petitioner”), files this
Administrative Complaint against, SANDRA BARNES (“BARNES”). The Petitioner seeks the
termination of Respondent’s employment with The School Board of Broward County, Florida,
pursuant to Sections 1001.51, 1012.27(5), and 1012.33, Florida Statutes. The Petitioner alleges the
following:
JURISDICTIONAL BASIS
1. The agency is The School Board of Broward County, Florida, (“SBBC”), which is
located at 600 Southeast Third Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida 33301. The
SBBC is a duly constituted school board charged with the duties to operate, control and supervise all
public schools within the school district of Broward County, Florida, pursuant to Article IX § 4(b),
Fla. Const.
2. Petitioner is the Superintendent of Schools for The School Board of Broward County,
Florida.
3. Petitioner is statutorily obligated to recommend the placement of school personnel
Aug 1? 2010 14:10
2010-08-17 14:41 >> 8509216847 =P 8/23
and to require compliance and observance with all laws, rules and regulations. Petitioner is
authorized to report and enforce any violation thereof, together with recommending the appropriate
disciplinary action against any instructional personnel employed by The School Board of Broward
County, Florida.
4. Respondent was employed at all times material herein, by The School Board of
Broward County, Florida, as a teacher pursuant to a Continuing Contract, pursuant to Fla. Stat.
1012.33(4) and holds a Florida Educational Certificate Number: 364225,
MATE L ALLEGATIONS
5. The school district has implemented a performance assessment system in conformity
with Section 1012.34, Florida Statutes known as Instructional Personnel Assessment System
(IPAS”).
6. On May 25, 2010, Respondent was issued the attached unsatisfactory IPAS noting
four (4) key areas: Lesson Presentation, Student Performance Evaluation, Behavior Management and
Records Management. This IPAS followed the completion of the attached Performance
Development Plan (“PDP”) during the 2009/2010 school year during which time Respondent was
given assistance and remedial suggestions following observations of her classroom performance.
7, Respondent’s employment with the school district commenced on October 5, 1976,
where she was assigned to Flamingo Elementary School. On April 20, 1978, Respondent’s
evaluation for the 1977/1978 school year noted professional assistance to the Respondent was
required to assist in helping her to structure her program.
8. The Respondent’s evaluation for the 1982/1983 school year noted the Respondent’s
performance deficiencies in classroom and time management.
Aug 1? 2010 14:11
2010-08-17 14:41 >> 8509216847 =P 9/23
9. In the 1997/1998 school year the Respondent requested and was granted a transfer to
Pembroke Lakes Elementary School.
10, On March 23, 1998, Respondent was given a memo from the Principal advising her
that she would be placed on a PDP for the 1997/1998 and 1998/1999 school years, following
assistance to correct her noted performance deficiencies. The noted areas of deficient performance
included instructional planning, lesson management, lesson presentation, student performance
evaluation, communication, classroom management, behavioral management, records management,
subject matter knowledge and professional competencies,
11. On June 26, 1998, Respondent received an IPAS noting five (5) areas of. performance
which required improvement, These areas involved lesson management, lesson presentation,
classroom management, behavior management and subject matter knowledge.
12. On July 1, 1998, Respondent requested a transfer which was not granted, During the
ensuing school years, Respondent’s performance deficiencies were noted on more then one (1)
occasion.
13, On October 16, 2000, a Post Observation Conference was held by the principal with
the Respondent and her union representative, The Respondent was advised of her performance
deficiencies in the following areas: assessments, planning and implementation of effective,
instructional methods/groups to meet the needs of the students, support student achievement,
implementation of classroom procedures and daily routines taught are reinforced and, timely and
appropriate review of student’s work and specific written feedback, The Respondent was advised
that an observation would be held at the end of the first quarter, and without noted improvernent, the
Respondent would be placed on a PDP. Four (4) days later, the Respondent scheduled a substitute to
Aug 1? 2010 14:11
2010-08-17 14:41 >> 8509216847 =P 10/23
cover her classes for the next seven (7) days. Respondent thereafter went on a Farnily Medical Leave
of Absence from November 1, 2000 through February 12, 2001.
14. Respondent's principal noted, in a written memorandum to her director on November
13, 2000, that it was not in the best interest of the students for Respondent to return to the classroom.
The principal also noted it would be unfair for the Respondent to return to the second graders who
now have been meeting with academic success for the first time this school year due to the teaching
ofa highly effective interim substitute, The principal noted that since the Respondent’s absence, the
principal has not had the multitude of parental calls, letters and concems regarding their child’s lack
of academic achievement. The principal expressed that the parents are anxious and concemed
regarding what happens when the Respondent returns to the classroom.
15. Upon the expiration of her medical leave, the Respondent requested a Personal Leave
of Absence for the remainder of the school year preventing the completion of the PDP and IPAS,
Respondent thereafter requested and was granted a transfer to Coconut Palm Elementary School in
February of 2001,
16. On the second day of school, Respondent was observed in a classroom fining up
students for lunch. Fifteen (15) minutes later, the Respondent was still attempting to line up the
students for lunch.
17. After lunch, on the same day, Respondent was observed counting her students in the
hallway outside the cafeteria. When questioned, Respondent explained that a student was missing
and she sent a paraprofessional to retrieve the grade book so she could call roll to determine the
missing student. Later that day, a parent observed the Respondent walk out to the car pool after
school with only seven (7) children. The parent’s child was not among them. When questioned, the
Aug 1? 2010 14:11
2010-08-17 14:42 >> 8509216847 =P 11/23
Respondent told the parent to “check the media center.” The child was found by the parent
wandering among the fifth graders.
18. The following day another parent complained that her son had not eaten a snack or
lunch the previous two (2) days. The Respondent was asked to point out the student but was unable
to do so without checking several name tags until she located the student in question. Respondent
further stated that she was unaware if the child had eaten or not, or even ifhe got into the lunch line.
19. The next day the Respondent was observed distributing lunch numbers to hang
around the student’s necks. Respondent did not know the children and the process took an
inordinate amount of time causing the class to be unruly. The assistant principal, in the absence of
Respondent’s effective classroom management, took over the class and passed out the numbers.
20. A conference was held with the Respondent and the principal on September 15,
2002 to discuss numerous concerns. One of the concerns was the Respondent’s refusal to tie the
kindergarten student’s shoelaces. Respondent instructed the students to “ust tuck them in your
shoes.” During this conference, Respondent blurted out that she didn’t lose a student, but the student
had changed his seat. Evidently, Respondent had misplaced a student, which was unknown to the
administration. Respondent was also unable to provide a satisfactory explanation why a missing
student was found under a lunch table by the cafeteria monitors. Observations of the Respondent’s
classroom performance were conducted throughout the remainder of the school year and assistance
was provided in an attempt to improve Respondent’s performance.
21. — This pattem continued into the 2003/2004 school year where several conferences
were held to discuss the observation of Respondent’s lesson presentation, lesson plans and other
assistance rendered to the Respondent.
Aug 1? 2010 14:11
2010-08-17 14:42 >> 8509216847 =P 12/23
22. On February 12, 2004, a conference was held with the Respondent and her union
Tepresentative concerning the February 2, 2004 observation, During this conference, Respondent’s
deficiencies in classroom and behavioral management were discussed, Respondent’s performance
was thereafter followed through observations and assistance.
23. On April 13, 2004, the administration decided to place the Respondent on a PDP,
which because of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, was unable to be completed prior to the end
of the school year.
24. On June 2, 2004, the Respondent’s IPAS was issued, Respondent was required
pursuant to the Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”) to be issued a satisfactory performance
evaluation. However, the principal noted that the Respondent needed to work on classroom
management, organizational skills and lesson planning. Respondent thereafter filed a grievance to
have these comments removed from her IPAS.
25. During the 2006/2007 school year, the Respondent had two (2) students injured on
the playground. Respondent did not timely send the students for medical treatment, or file a timely
report. Numerous parent complaints and requests for withdrawal of their children from the
Respondent’s classroom continued. One incident involved the Respondent belittling a student by
calling him “the dumbest kid in my class.”
26. During the 2008/2009 school year, the Respondent was removed from teaching
Kindergarten due to numerous complaints made by parents. The parents also expressed that
Respondent was an ineffective teacher.
Aug 1? 2010 14:12
2010-08-17 14:42 >> 8509216847 =P 13/23
27. During the 2008/2009 school year, numerous incidents were brought to the
Respondent's attention concerning her interaction with administration, staff, parents and students,
including but not limited to the following:
A. Respondent’s refusal to attend field trips, field days, or team-sponsored
events which isolated her students.
B. Respondent’s failure to follow standard protocols for bathroom breaks.
Respondent was issued a memorandum on September 19, 2008 to cease this pattern of behavior and
was directed to contact the front office to request a break. Respondent refused this directive and
instead left the students unsupervised when she went to take her bathroom break.
Cc. Respondent refused to comply with the mandated requirements for fifteen
(15) minutes of structured recess for her students. Instead, Respondent would have a second grader
carry a chair outside for her to sit on so she could watch the students conduct an unstructured recess.
One student was injured while carrying this chair.
28. — Respondent’s ineffective teaching methods during this period becarne apparent to
administrators, parents and faculty. Respondent engaged in conflict or confrontation with other
teachers over a number of issues.
29. The assessment data in January, 2009 revealed that ten (10) out of Respondent's
eighteen (18) students had not moved from a pre-primer level since September 17, 2008. Five (5) of
the eight (8) students only showed a minimal progress. A review of her student’s progress for the
2007/2008 school year depicted that fifty (50%) percent of the student’s scores decreased,
30. When brought to her attention, Respondent wrote a rebuttal to state that ninety (90%)
Aug 1? 2010 14:12
2010-08-17 14:43 >> 8509216847 =P 14/23
percent of her students did not pass their AR tests because she only had one (1) white student who
was from Hungary. The Respondent's demographics were identical to those of her colleagues.
31, Thereafter, Respondent was observed and given assistance during February and
March. On February 12, 2009, a substitute filling in for the Respondent found that her lesson plans
contained math pages that didn’t correspond with the comprehension page. Further, Respondent’s
lesson plan did not include approved Broward County curriculum. Instead, Respondent used non-
approved materials.
32. A review of the Respondent’s grade books on April 1, 2009 noted a number of
discrepancies in completion of thesereports. Students had been assigned grades without conferring
with the other reading teachers. Numerous report cards had identical grades, Several grades were
missing from the grade books and no grade averages were indicated in the grade books. Respondent
was unable to provide any explanation how she arrived at the grades other than through her
observation. Respondent was required to re-do the grade book and report cards for the second
quarter and was directed to follow protocol. Respondent failed to do so.
33, During this conference, it was brought to the Respondent’s attention that during one
of the observations, a student complained of an injury to her arm. Respondent, without looking at
the student, dismissed the student’s complaint and stated “go sit down you will be fine.”
34, On April 3, 2009, the Respondent was notified of a conference scheduled for Apri!
16, 2009 to formulate a PDP. Respondent thereafter applied for and was granted a leave of absence
for the remainder of the school year. Upon her return for the 2009/2010 school year, a conference
was held with the Respondent and her BTU Representative to initiate a PDP. On September 17,
Aug 1? 2010 14:13
2010-08-17 14:43 >> 8509216847 =P 15/23
2009, Respondent left students unsupervised after being given a directive by her principal. The
Respondent retorted that she was in the copy room doing her Progress Reports.
35. On October 16, 2009, a conference with the Respondent and the BTU was held
to discuss the Respondent’s performance deficiencies and formulate a PDP through May 2010.
36. On February 5, 2010, the Respondent once again failed to timely issue Interim
Reports. The Respondent claimed that she was confused about the instruction for completing an
Interim Report Card.
37, On February 25, 2010, Respondent failed to provide appropriate supervision and
protection to a first grade student. While proceeding to the front door of the school for dismissal,
Respondent lost track of a newly enrolled student. The student was found wandering, scared,
distraught and lost in a vacant hallway by another teacher. Respondent accepted no responsibility for
her action, and instead blamed the student and his mother. A similar incident occurred on October
28, 2009 when Respondent left a first prader unsupervised on the playground when she returned to
the classroom. Another teacher found the student on the playground following the Respondent's
recess period. The Respondent was issued a written reprimand as a result of the October 2009
incident, In the reprimand, Respondent was advised the following:
Please be advised that any further failure on your part to perform to
the standards established for the effective and productive performance
of your job duties as a teacher will result in further disciplinary
action, up to and including termination of your employment. The
Respondent submitted a written rebuttal faulting the “numerous
interruptions in and out of the class,” and claimed the interruptions
were “disparate treatment and harassment.”
38. On June 16, 2010, Respondent’s principal forwarded the attached IPAS to the
Aug 1? 2010 14:13
2010-08-17 14:43 >> 8509216847 =P 16/23
Superintendent with a recommendation that the Respondent’s employment be terminated with The
School Board of Broward County, Florida. Notice was provided to the Respondent by the Petitioner
of his request that The School Board of Broward County, Florida terminate Respondent's
employment contract.
ADMINIST. IVE CHARGES
39. The following charges are brought against the Respondent, predicated on the
foregoing factual allegations, pursuant to Fla, Stat. 1012.33(4)(c), Respondent’s Employment
Contract, School Board Rules and Regulations and 6B-4.009 of the Florida Administrative Code,
including but not limited to the following:
COUNT 1: INCOMPETENCY
40. Respondent has violated Fla. Stat. § 1012.33(4)(c), and Rule 6B-4.009(1) of the
Florida Administrative Code. Respondent is incompetent to perform her contractual obligation by
reason of her inability or lack of fitness to discharge her required duty as a result of inefficiency or
incapacity as defined in Rule 6B-4.009(1).
COUNT 2: GROSS INSUBORDINATION/WILLFUL NEGLECT OF DUTIES
41. Respondent’s aforedescribed actions in refusing to obey a direct order(s) which were
reasonable in nature and given by and with proper authority is violative of Fla, Stat. 1012.33(4)(c)
and Rule 6B-4.009(4) of the Florida Administrative Code.
10
Aug 1? 2010 14:13
2010-08-17 14:44 >> 8509216847 =P 17/23
COUNT 3: MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE
42. Respondent has violated Fla, Stat. 1012.33(4)(c) and Rule 6B-4.009(3) of the Florida
Administrative Code. Respondent’s acts are defined as a violation of the Code of Ethics of the
Educational Profession as adopted in Rule 6B-1.001 F.A.C. and of Principles of Professional
Conduct for the Educational Provisions in Florida, as adopted by Rule 6B-1.006, F.A.C., which are
80 serious so as to impair the individual's effectiveness in the school system, which includes the
following:
(3) Obligation to the student requires that the individual:
(a) shall make a reasonable effort to protect the student
from conditions harmful to learning and/or to the
student's mental and/or physical health and/or safety.
(b) shall not unreasonably restrain a student from
independent action in pursuit of learning.
(c) shall not unreasonably deny a student access to diverse points of view.
(2) shall not intentionally suppress or distort subject matter
relevant to a student’s academic program.
(ec) shall not intentionally expose a student to unnecessary
embarrassment or disparagement.
@ shall not intentionally violate or deny a student’s legal rights.
43. This Administrative Complaint is brought pursuant to the authority outlined in Fla.
Stat. §§ 120.57; 1001.42: 1012.22; 1006.07; 1006.28; 1006.21; 1001.50; 1001.49; 1001.51; 1012.27;
1006.08; 1012.33(1)(a); 1012.34 and Chapters 6B-1 and 6B-4 of the Florida Administrative Code.
il
Aug 1? 2010 14:13
2010-08-17 14:44 >> 8509216847 =P 18/23
DEMAND FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, Petitioner, James F. Notter, Superintendent of
Schools, recommends the dismissal of the Respondent, SANDRA BARNES, from her employment
with The School Board of Broward County, Florida, based upon the foregoing facts and legal
authority. Petitioner further recommends the immediate suspension of Respondent without further
pay or benefits in the event the Respondent should challenge The School Board's decision to
terminate her employment.
EXECUTED this 20 — day of June, 2010.
JAMES F. NOTTER
Superintendent of Schools
THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY,
FLORIDA
Prepared by Charles T. Whitelock, P.A.
12
Aug 1? 2010 14:14
2010-08-17 14:44 >> 8509216847 =P 19/23
Broward County Public School District, Florida . Instructional Personnel Assessment System v C.
Employee: Sandra Barnes |senoo! Yeux 2009-10 | ype of Ascesement: $ - Satisfactory 2 g
School: Coconut Palm Elem | Personnel # — tgsig [Contract Status: Development RaunS | N-Needs Improvement |.“ °
Date Collection Dates: 8/09-6/10 | Aseessor — T. Thelinas, Principal | pocumentation’| _* | U- a y 2
‘ornvance: Areas: Instructional Personnel Performance Indicators |Rating _| if 1 \s. &
‘Develops lesson plane and selects Bevel: ops Jesson plang which reflect the Relates instructional elements such ag O° a
instructional materials and activities whieh) precequisite knowledge, skille, and gontent, materials, aelivities, formal, Oo
+ reflect the district’s curriculum acape and adit f students. a goals to Identified student needs,
Instructional sequence and identified leamery’ needs, | ns= of turer “nee nese Oo
Planning Specifies learner objectives and relates Speelfies the steps, it ili and
Identifies and sequences content. Wiese to the instructional activity. pating of etudent acthvities appropriate: EN 4
their needa and the content 4 D
: SETI =m neaeRee
‘
Soleets and usea appropriate ingtesetional |” uf ech
technique: including available materials | Emphasizes what is impottant to aie cations whl oh ae clear and
and technology which support leaning torember, tesponding
Lesson of the specific types of knowledge or
Presentation Uses different types of questions te obtain
Circulates about the room as students desired Jeamer responses.
engage in seatwork and asslate students .
as needed, par aeenerid aasponses to queslitnt| views student wade and provides ely
Gives cleat, beled, and expileit directions
and cheeks forunderitanding,
Presents connected or associated
and thoughe,
Uses correct grammar in written and oral
sommunicabiare.
Communicates leamer elatug and
. ays progress to parents in order to maintain
Demonstrates basic mechanits af writing: | 3 positive, collaborative retationship.
spelling capitalization, and punctuation. | Additionally, esminunicater leatmay
ttatus and progress to the student and
other professionala,
Communication
Expressed Interest and exeltement
through verbal and nonverbal behavior,
paki ae
Demonstrates an awareness of what all
students are doing
Establishes and implements apecifie
behavioral and procedural expectations,
Behavior
Management rales, and consequences, Stops inappropriate behavior before it
apreads or becomes more carious,
E 7 _ renee é
Subj lect Matter Precurts securate information, Recognizes and promotes the relationship romecnnr oxgenixes and presents :
} of the subject with the school’s curriculum. | content forthe spe ubjest, 4 ,
Kogelede (a i : : a)
Fan TERA
he Hi “
- Needs Improvement
Overall Performance Rating] §- Satisfactory tanmel sonbact teachers only) U- Unsatisfactory [mw [eo
f : £
Assessor °
< = eee < ont
Oars et meas on ee iW, Dope ns ii
€
Yao.g
yg, We op SoA ee cenit Same
ord CO
: Suge ee oy ahs CORES era A SS ‘
Aug 1? 2010 14:15
8509216847 =P 20/23
>>
2010-08-17 14:46
mn, Gay a coo boanud PLN a ee fore 9
Beeradene Sot ease hoo SOUP IIO. Sgro : a enee bo
S058 ot Soe as si ENS = c
of ao}
- pl. a
ot atetcae ee
AS en DoACIGUIT poten wap ar te Aytysithsd Uonplp iI eb
OVE Y Sr ie 2d a aye Sabie sup ‘tn kes, ¥.
G ape ree idakopluie ayy so SspuawWES jeuOHTf a
“SORT TIES cisle § oNSfE —wo-ugy
ins nosdesse OY} JO SJUSWUWIOS PHUCHIPpY
DP tt aye ZF t /
ONS fe _ite | ce andi Ges en ae eed mati
VIO DDH Op. JOVIGOIY TP Wowie poapotiblyy CPHOR tHe.
sseuBon peacudde pieog je uo Ajepy yA ayy pode: pus sesso) 2 sue swepns
Auep) Aedoud 01 sazzinb 'y jsa] WoossEp ‘eyEp juUSSEssE Ago Asn || SauEg “SIjy
Crs, 74
th
*paeu 1 Suepns
jo eBeleae apes juepnys qusuns joatfel PUB ISLEEU ASU @ Ut aUOp aq [A sUodes WSU]
ueed so pus ey) YBnous, paurpUlEW ag | yOoqapelh ey) Woy y1OM papers jo sardog
‘JEepug|eg snsoy pewayanysut
ret gy ce VSON. POON
Vo 1% nd yoy st
corpse ef CoLd f! 40
2% Leg pleby
“PRAUCS JO LOHEUILWS] JO pug uoleNjeAy
S¥dl Aiojpeysyesun ue UW! NSeI TIAA
7US|ONSP SB PSL HUSp] Sear je apeypewal
6) /ESN}e! 16 uN{!e] 16) sssuanbssuog
“eaue jelans e& UI ssaGerd
ShyS pue sbpe/AOUy |SUePNis ENpALpU!
Buipiocal Jo} aysAs © UreIUIEy ,
yooq epe.6 pus upd ucsse] eyep-o}-dn
1 ep BSJEPURU SUL MONO! [IA SOLE “Say DASSASSE Ole TU] SNS s1OEds loeyey FM YOOqaPEID pue ‘ajeunsee ‘peziuBBre ue upIuEr) .
“OROS ‘Ph Aeyy UBnouy a”, ated “bom . PW {3S aa Aq papiaoid ag [lA eourlsissy +O] SHEY seLoRE |
uo Buinuiues pure o1oe ‘rayenb yoea 19) sapei6 pawes jo aBeleae ayy jaye. ln SapeuB prea podas wapns
‘ZL Yue Aq SepUEep
Paluepe jo Arje3 yy “sounpesoud Burpes6 ype ase|ael qi Sr. ANSASSYNYA SOdoCodHy
. ————
Ti Ambon, * saul
i
Ais (ee see :
a oe fe ;
WS _ovenig @ eet fedbOUL - SEWWI@L) Psera) ABILEWAIA WEY uesog Srari ” Saweg BIPUES
a1 Moa sdn-moyos) UBle SIYT JO e7Eq Jossessy loys] # leuuoSsied . sakopdwy yo euep
: SLU C|oAaC SO rz O1IS4 BpHoly Joujsiq pooyos sand Ajun PieMolg
Aug 1? 2010 14:16
8509216847 =P 21/23
>>
2010-08-17 14:46
, Sey we ss Lae &
“appa NS TN ie eat
Rae . a yop u » OR IS Ks od :
Bui, oot SHS: oyr6a4 ; ee ite fuer . ; }
- he fre
xg” ee Se bt 22 Hp ye pomtpuo? 4° neal Yegp “tee! pL Ge WHT
& SB6GLM. - rit] r AS RAMS WIA AO, x. Las plea
awa a. 28: EI "aru buy waplad eer WA tp hoae aes Tyimeg ye
Lejane? Sg a Z rit yp perbepy T
- A, -
: F Sa opel FRA ® Age SU] JO STUSLUOD teuont py “JoRUNS 40 UOEUTWJe] Jo pue uOENeAS
. iis 7 iE S¥di Loe syesun ue urynsel [IM
° bY OL: 7 a ! Ly (Ee pes at 1USISHSD SE PAHNUSP] Stee [je ayerpeu:
“Ls 4 4 s ie HOBSOSSE ay} JO SIUSINUIOS UOT IPDY OMesnjal to aunye}) 20) saouanbesues
Sooo Sa
~ paprnoud oq jimh SOUBISISSY “yELUBOUOJUIE! Srusod Jo asn esBOLOLN AA SALTER “Su
OfY" “Ausiesiue tenis pupsscug
“JO|A2Yaq Wwapis saysod equopuisy ,
aWeBeUe A) IOIAZ US
“SROUOS ero SBLUOoSG JO speaids
Y Si0jeq JolABYyad ependoudden dos ,
‘ueld AOWEyeg epi jooYos ol) BZA I[IM SAweEg “Supy
it . ‘Bulop ae siuapnys
pe . “ssouanbesuce ayeudodde aa6 pue sionpuoasiw We ISIseN | SBUEG ‘SULA Hie Jey JO ssauaieme UP S]EysuOWed ,
Li
. gOPS Seber -aA 2 iin AGoptes <7 “WUD} VOWTENS|A WOOIssPID 1) Bus “saquenbasuns pure ‘san
T 2 = *suioneyedxe jeunpeoold pue poloweyeq
pawn pure — “ oypads juswe|dul, Bue ysijqeysy ,
“BLOz "H-FeHy YBNI, * SOLU, Gob »yoeqpes? opioid ple aAlesge IV OTS YP FAG * A . 0} Sey ss yore
uo Guinunuce pure Loz Taw pet :
"EL yore Aq semusloyen “saduanbesuos
PayuEp! jo Ua,sE ly BUE SPEMNG SPNPOUl OL UB ey JIABYSR SBUIER “SIA MALAGU [IM ey OLAy Say, . Hii LNA YN HOIAVHIG
i
= ats i as = Be Eh ie
of f&Efyt .
towstt Ag Bore Os yediouyg - SeWjeyL PSaeL AB USWOA WEY NUEDOD Srarl . ; Seung PIpUBS
ape aaney sdremojjog) UPd S14} so ayaq scssessy| leoyo5 | =F uUoslag . sakopdwig Jo suey
qd JUaWIdO|aAeg SoUBLUIOLS, BPO]. ‘FOISIG joouaS Sqn, Alun = Puemoug
Aug 1? 2010 14:16
8509216847 =P 22/23
>>
2010-08-17 14:47
agopnes
Kid MANNS wo Be
Ssh S6GE LAL 47u jet Tao? ee ‘ae ewe
al pe bao sires te ye ae exper reed db
ai Hg 2, taut tt ib nib dian david 12 Te :
| \ 9 Pee pets pet f reehoduse at $9 SUSUTWCS jBUOT bp y FRIED JO UOHEUIULS] JO pue
ay sossesay Py f Sf a LORenPAA Syid{ ACE pSIESUN USE. In,
Ym, ¢ ensle ° Pe ae f 4 NLGOYOP SE PSY UApt Seaue [je ayerpauiad
olsfe are MOSSASSE ou JO SUSU ey} 0) JBSNjSu 10 Gun|[e} 153 sasuanbasucg
f
LF ty
Ae) a, 1
paper fit Sp ans sos 49 OHO
ey Sf C_LL ane Sale ee i ~ . re alentens le pote ag
argsye ab “to hey ry) aa PORE wre were pret tuk ye papf Pa.
ao bas ted reg Si FE
f t TF
“OLOZ 4etteyy UBnouyy
Uo Buinugues pue OLGZ
‘Zh Ueyy Aq sapueyep
«GR Son cnet foepns we SN gor™ eae
ea
Says os
OF, ORE
pe rude
poopy 1g wives paiiby wyevip
(919 ‘lu| “HY "HYLS) Jepuepes weussesse s,/D0Yos SU) MOlIO} JIM SSURG ‘SI -
“WOHONSU: drove yes Jo) epep quepngs
Guisn ul is|ss2 lala UO ]S@9p0q WOlTan]suy vas BYEQ Sy) MeIAS! IMA SALW “SITY
Dando: se
Sees] “Urey puz ‘Supeay UF UONOMISU! ABPOU Oo} sazzinb 9 yJOM Ajep asn
eco bon) Seer eyep Aq sdnev6 Guipees Aupoul Ajenuucs [jin sewed “Su
A
ssa Aq paplacsd aq |i SOURISISsy "Speen Japs /EnpIAIpul
vA
Poh =
ogon IVSE ga 4
pag need Gly FE
J “umole
SJBeA aud Aq Spuepuels Lojeonpy
JoqsWLedsg US peseg suet swepeas
MOYS ‘AWK ‘OUISI Pub Beze ‘aoz
UolEAOULT '}OoYos euL Aq PSysyqeisa
SeAIS[QO pus SPIEPUELS JUBWEASTYSE
Buuleye ul! ssaufoid ruspms sous ,
+O} SHE} iyo]
NOLLYMTYAA
peyAuap) jo arse py 0} UOHOMISIN SjeqUeLeYIp 0} suL|d UOSSO| Arpow ILM Seuleg “S14 ‘s}eyS BIEp uC paseg SONVRINOSHad INFONLS
; .
: : : a
BEE batalla
“oLcas Aq fectouy g ~sewjeyy esse, ~ AEMeWelS WIRE INUESED rere seureg eupues
eqeg aoeusdn-mojjoy) UPI S141 10 aye sossessy Jooyss | # jeuuosueg sosopduy jo oweN
d JUSLUCO/aAag SIUBLUIOIOd PPUOL UISIG joouss oiqng Ajun paemolg
Aug 1? 2010 14:17
8509216847 =P 23/23
>>
2010-08-17 14:48
{ Bauer am
“OLOg ere uBreau,
uo Sumuquos 9 O10e
‘2b Usueyy Aq sajouapyep
Paynuap! so Arsysepy
_obstantg
S76 Mopaay s dn-moi]
SI Tr
/$ um
Bid SIG} 36 apeq)
Fur ro mere shea By al hows surog SAL
“SHS JO AJa]SBLU PUB UOSUeYe:cdWwios SIUEpnis ssesse Oo Sy res I}4 SOWIE EG SU
“sisisap Tesolneyeq
of Pee DUSReNSST OL InaU SRE NOOSE AA UoHORUR PIR UM SGU RB, SN
Joy uapMs a|Gus B uD je pUe Sspuoces g O1¢ YEA ‘Onsen aGurs e yse JIM SOLE ‘Suyy
rier aaa ST 7 sennon sen mney
“ore “Buntydwe ‘Burgqoid
‘sasuodse, Gurziubooss se yons senkyuyoey yoeqpees aAnoaye asm [JIM SOUIBE “SIA
te te f— 4a pepincid on yn coueysissy
“UOHE]uaseid Uo! O}U! SSNS LONTEISPU] PUB /EUOPEATOW epeiodsoou! FA SOE “Su
LEA ISS By) OuUAT are 9 LO Stem FOYE Sul Prquuasac. Wi
Prssasppy-a eq i om hbaynoy ys SVL wo] uelaysia woelsseys
out Bupsn pug senduyoey uopewesaid uosse| uo Bulsnoo)
pue TE “PRT Ae SAMOSGO |I"A SOLER “SIP
‘sou 5 of yaeqpesy AGU 7 BALSSCEO [pina Z
brary} FOO bh age 1) A@MBaery- su
jecioun -seWjey) Bsaiay AIRIUSIUA A Weg Nua
sossasey yooyas
# jauuosieg
BPHOL ‘IOHISIG [COYydS o/Fqng Aun
: WEY =r eS Ss +E ; OBES LIN
YORE NEA Gyr SS ENS Sa Sav eae GREW Fron Ad . coum y vez reread
7 a, nF Ra ee TAK PND ity th dhe oP 4 pore vie MoD 3
a AZANY wird Sep, “DAY oe were se Work DAS ayo :
aad 1 + “yphO?. Boa rm NOS < py oud voted rpa8 1 te
¢ ssc OS fe o fur 2 B prewpued po Waev ida APY Lag biene
ons .
Tee) EH A ‘al 4
oF Lays ; 7 Breer gos) / hike dy vipetbady monn ge 4)
oy 4g apr lee ret peas res vega ye pt Fw bsp LO seehojdwea ayy jo syuswwoogguopippy ‘wenuoa Jo woul 30 pue voyenjengy
ores scssoesy 2 '/SIE : y . S¥d| AweysHesun ue UE INS! [LAA
d Mis ae shS ar al OT G } Peery a LAS Yep $e payjiuep] SeaueE je de|paures
en Soa 7/7? 1 raced vit bus ¥ ? aD) _ MOSSSSSE al} JO SpUaLITLIOS FoUOLY pp Oo} lesnyel 20 eunt}e) 10) seauenbesucg
‘ARC ye “SPTOSIO Of “apa rs
‘spaeu quepnis pus seauoelqo
BUOSNASUL JO jes Peyeufisep ayy
JO] SAIIANOR PUB s[eLeyetw jeuoTONySU
sOuanbes pure ‘dojaaep Jo ydepe "pajes -
4
Bulpueysiapun Jo} 4999 puE
suoqdeulp pondxe pue jeuq Weep en.
Bulpuodisas
aioyaq oes oO] spuapMs sunbed
pue Jegs ee UsiuA SuOysanb ys ,
EGRESS] eplacd puE suoysenb
o] Sasucdsey s,juapnys szjuBoosy ,
pepeau se :
S]USpNAS 1S1SSe Pur yomyees Hi aBbeGua
SIVADNIS SB WOO! ayy INOgE BRINIG .
20] S|[B] EySRe |
NOLLY.LN3SSudd NOSSS1
SProri Soweg Sipues
eekojduig ;o eu,
pIEMOIg
Docket for Case No: 10-007771TTS
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Dec. 27, 2011 |
Order Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
|
Dec. 22, 2011 |
Rerspondent's Notice of Waiver filed.
|
Dec. 19, 2011 |
Notice of Service of Respondent's Response to Petitioner's Request for Admissions filed.
|
Dec. 14, 2011 |
Order Extending Date for Filing Pre-hearing Stipulation.
|
Dec. 14, 2011 |
Petitioners' Joint Response to Respondent's Motion for Continuance/Petitioners' Request for Pre-trial Stipulation (filed in Case No. 11-005634PL).
|
Dec. 14, 2011 |
Petitioners' Joint Response to Respondent's Motion for Continuance/Petitioners' Request for Pre-trial Stipulation filed.
|
Dec. 13, 2011 |
Order Denying Continuance of Final Hearing.
|
Dec. 12, 2011 |
Motion for Continuance filed.
|
Dec. 12, 2011 |
Order of Pre-hearing Order.
|
Dec. 09, 2011 |
CASE STATUS: Pre-Hearing Conference Held. |
Dec. 01, 2011 |
Notice of Re-scheduling of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for December 9, 2011; 2:00 p.m.).
|
Nov. 30, 2011 |
Respondent's Unopposed Motion to Reset Pretrial Conference filed.
|
Nov. 17, 2011 |
Notice of Transfer.
|
Nov. 17, 2011 |
Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 10-7771TTS and 11-5634PL).
|
Nov. 16, 2011 |
Joint Motion to Consolidate filed.
|
Nov. 08, 2011 |
Respondent's Unopposed Motion Rescinding Order on Petitioner's Motion for Protective Order filed.
|
Nov. 04, 2011 |
Notice of Cancelation of Deposition (Laquita Lee, Sefanie Alvord and AnnMarie Bolivar) filed.
|
Nov. 04, 2011 |
Notice of Cancelation of Deposition (Tamara Osborne, Toni Weissberg and Donald Gardner) filed.
|
Nov. 04, 2011 |
Notice of Cancelation of Deposition (Terri Thelmas and Marsha Wagner) filed.
|
Nov. 04, 2011 |
Notice of Cancelation of Deposition (Dildra Martin-Ogbum) filed.
|
Oct. 25, 2011 |
Re-Notice of Taking Depositions (Terri Thelmas, Marsha Wagner, Tamara Osborne, Donald Gardner, Toni Weissberg, Laquita Lee, AnnMarie Bolivar, Stefanie Alvord, and Dildra Martin-Ogburn) filed.
|
Oct. 12, 2011 |
Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Protective Order filed.
|
Oct. 12, 2011 |
Protective Order.
|
Oct. 06, 2011 |
Order to Respond to Petitioner's Motion for Protective Order/Motion for Sanctions.
|
Oct. 06, 2011 |
Petitioner's Motion for Protective Order/Motion for Sanctions filed.
|
Sep. 14, 2011 |
Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for December 9, 2011; 9:30 a.m.).
|
Sep. 14, 2011 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Sep. 14, 2011 |
Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for January 10 through 12, 2012; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL; amended as to Date, time and location of hearing).
|
Aug. 26, 2011 |
Respondent's Notice of Availability filed.
|
Aug. 17, 2011 |
Respondent's Unopposed Motion for Continuance filed.
|
Aug. 11, 2011 |
Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for September 26, 2011; 2:00 p.m.).
|
Jul. 20, 2011 |
Order on Amended Motion in Limine.
|
Mar. 30, 2011 |
Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Amended Motion in Limine filed.
|
Mar. 16, 2011 |
Amended Motion in Limine filed.
|
Mar. 08, 2011 |
Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for August 29, 2011; 9:00 a.m.).
|
Mar. 08, 2011 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for September 6 through 9, 2011; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Mar. 07, 2011 |
Joint Motion to Continue Hearing filed.
|
Mar. 03, 2011 |
Order Denying Respondent`s Motion in Limine.
|
Mar. 02, 2011 |
Motion in Limine filed.
|
Jan. 06, 2011 |
Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for March 31, 2011; 10:30 a.m.).
|
Jan. 06, 2011 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for April 11 through 14, 2011; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Jan. 05, 2011 |
Unopposed Motion for Continuance filed.
|
Oct. 12, 2010 |
Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for January 10, 2010; 11:00 a.m.).
|
Sep. 20, 2010 |
Notice of Service of Respondent's Request for Production of Documents and Things filed.
|
Sep. 20, 2010 |
Notice of Service of Respondent's First Set of Interrogatories to Petitioner filed.
|
Aug. 27, 2010 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for January 24 through 28, 2011; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Aug. 27, 2010 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Aug. 24, 2010 |
Order to Show Cause why Jurisdiction Should Not be Relinquished.
|
Aug. 18, 2010 |
Initial Order.
|
Aug. 17, 2010 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Aug. 17, 2010 |
Recommendation for Termination of Continuing Contract filed.
|
Aug. 17, 2010 |
Agenda Request Form filed.
|
Aug. 17, 2010 |
Request for Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Aug. 17, 2010 |
Referral Letter filed.
|