Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MANATEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs KARYN CENA, 10-008694TTS (2010)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 10-008694TTS Visitors: 37
Petitioner: MANATEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Respondent: KARYN CENA
Judges: WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Agency: County School Boards
Locations: Sarasota, Florida
Filed: Sep. 01, 2010
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, March 1, 2011.

Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2011
Summary: The issue in this case is whether the Manatee County School Board (Petitioner) has just cause to terminate the employment of Teacher Karyn Cena (Respondent).Physical contact with first grader was unnecessary and sufficient to warrant termination.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


MANATEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,


Petitioner,


vs.


KARYN CENA,


Respondent.

)

)

)

)

) Case No. 10-8694

)

)

)

)

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


On November 29, 2010, a formal administrative hearing was conducted by video teleconference in Tallahassee and Sarasota, Florida, before William F. Quattlebaum, Administrative Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Scott A. Martin, Esquire

Manatee County School Board

215 Manatee Avenue, West, Second Floor Bradenton, Florida 34205


For Respondent: Melissa C. Mihok, Esquire

Kelly & McKee, P.A.

1718 East Seventh Avenue, Suite 301 Post Office Box 75638

Tampa, Florida 33675-0638 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

The issue in this case is whether the Manatee County School Board (Petitioner) has just cause to terminate the employment of Teacher Karyn Cena (Respondent).


PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By an Administrative Complaint dated August 20, 2010, the Petitioner alleged that on May 11, 2010, the Respondent forcibly grabbed a student by the arm in a disciplinary incident that was subsequently determined to be an incident of child abuse.

The Respondent denied the allegations and requested a formal administrative hearing. The Petitioner forwarded the dispute to the Division of Administrative Hearings, which scheduled and conducted the proceeding.

At the hearing, the Petitioner presented the testimony of six witnesses and had Exhibits 1 through 9 admitted into evidence. The Respondent testified on her own behalf, presented the testimony of one witness, and had Exhibits 1 through 10 admitted into evidence.

A Transcript of the hearing was filed on January 3, 2011. Both parties filed Proposed Recommended Orders that have been considered in the preparation of this Recommended Order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. At all times material to this case, the Respondent was a first grade teacher employed by the Petitioner to work at Tillman Elementary School (Tillman) pursuant to a professional services contract.


  2. On May 11, 2010, the Tillman first grade students were gathered in an auditorium to rehearse for a musical program to be presented in celebration of Memorial Day.

  3. The students had been rehearsing for several days prior to May 11, 2010. As might be expected, some first grade students required occasional redirection. Such redirection was generally communicated by a teacher delivering a "stern look" to the non-complying student. If the correction was not successful, a non-complying student was directed to go to the back of the room and sit on a bench that essentially served as a "time out" area.

  4. At one point in the program, the students were standing, singing, and holding up their arms, pretending to waive American flags. The flags had not yet been distributed to the students. During this portion of the rehearsal on May 11, 2010, the Respondent apparently thought that one of the students ("S.M.") was playing and not pretending to wave the non-existent flag appropriately.

  5. The Respondent grabbed the student by the arm and quickly walked the student to the back of the room, where the Respondent placed the student forcefully on the time out bench. The student did not resist the Respondent in any manner.


  6. There was no credible evidence that the Respondent provided any redirection to the student prior to her physical interaction with the student.

  7. There was no evidence that the student was unable to comply with a verbal directive delivered by the Respondent or any other teacher.

  8. There was no evidence that the student was acting out or posed any threat whatsoever to himself or any other student, or to the Respondent or any other school employee.

  9. There was no evidence that any force or physical contact was necessary whatsoever to correct the student's behavior or to direct the student to the time out area.

  10. At the hearing, the Respondent was described by witnesses as appearing "angry" during the incident. Although the Respondent denied that she was angry with the child, the Respondent's interaction with the student was clearly inappropriate under the circumstances, and it is not unreasonable to attribute her behavior to anger.

  11. Observers of the incident testified that the student appeared to be embarrassed by the incident, sitting with his head bowed after being placed on the bench. Some teachers testified that they felt personal embarrassment for the student.


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  12. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to and subject matter of this proceeding. §§ 120.569 and 120.57(1), Fla. Stat. (2010).1/

  13. The Petitioner has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence the allegations set forth in the Administrative Complaint underlying the proposed termination of the Respondent's employment. McNeill v. Pinellas Cnty. Sch. Bd., 678 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Dileo v. Sch. Bd. of

    Dade Cnty., 569 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). In this case, the burden has been met.

  14. At all times material to this case, the Respondent was employed as a first grade teacher through a professional services contract with the Petitioner. Manatee County School Board Policy 6.11(12)(c) states as follows:

    Any employee of the School Board may be terminated from employment for just cause, including, but not limited to, immorality, misconduct in office, gross insubordination, willful neglect of duty, drunkenness, or conviction of any crime involving moral turpitude, violation of the Policies and Procedures Manual of the School District of Manatee County, violation of any applicable Florida statute, violation of the Code of Ethics and the Principles of Professional Conduct of the Education Profession in Florida. (Emphasis supplied)


  15. Florida Administrative Code Rule 6B-4.009 provides the following relevant definitions:


    1. Misconduct in office is defined as a violation of the Code of Ethics of the Education Profession as adopted in Rule 6B- 1.001, F.A.C., and the Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida as adopted in Rule 6B- 1.006, F.A.C., which is so serious as to impair the individual’s effectiveness in the school system.


  16. The Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida are set forth at Florida Administrative Code Rule 6B-1.006 and provides, in relevant part, as follows:

    6B-1.006 Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida.


    1. Obligation to the student requires that the individual:


      1. Shall make reasonable effort to protect the student from conditions harmful to learning and/or to the student’s mental and/ or physical health and/or safety.


        * * *


        (e) Shall not intentionally expose a student to unnecessary embarrassment or disparagement.


  17. The evidence established that by her physical contact with the student, the Respondent failed to make a reasonable effort to protect the student from conditions harmful to physical health or safety.


  18. The evidence establishes that the Respondent intentionally exposed the student to unnecessary embarrassment by her conduct towards the student during the incident.

  19. The superintendent of the Manatee County school system credibly testified during the hearing that the Respondent's misconduct was sufficient to impair her effectiveness in the school system because she acted out of anger.

  20. The Petitioner asserts that the Respondent violated section 1003.32(1)(j), Florida Statutes, by use of excessive force during the incident. The cited statute provides, in relevant part, as follows:

    In accordance with this section and within the framework of the district school board’s code of student conduct, teachers and other instructional personnel shall have the authority to undertake any of the following actions in managing student behavior and ensuring the safety of all students in their classes and school and their opportunity to learn in an orderly and disciplined classroom:


    * * *


    (j) Use reasonable force, according to standards adopted by the State Board of Education, to protect himself or herself or others from injury.


  21. There is no evidence that the State Board of Education has adopted standards related to the use of reasonable force in the classroom. However, there was no evidence presented that there was any need for the Respondent to touch the student or to


    apply any force whatsoever during the incident. There was no evidence that the student posed any threat to himself or to any other person.

  22. The Administrative Complaint alleged that the incident had been investigated by Child Protective Services (CPS) and the Manatee County Sheriff's Office and that the CPS had completed the investigation with "verified findings of child abuse." The allegation was supported only by hearsay evidence that was insufficient to support a finding of fact; accordingly, no such

findings have been made.


RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Manatee County School Board enter a final order, terminating the employment of Karyn Cena.

DONE AND ENTERED this 1st day of March, 2011, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 1st day of March, 2011.


ENDNOTE


1/ Unless otherwise indicated, all references to the Florida Statutes are to the 2010 version.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Scott A. Martin, Esquire Manatee County School Board

215 Manatee Avenue, West, Second Floor Bradenton, Florida 34205


Melissa C. Mihok, Esquire Kelly & McKee, P.A.

1718 East Seventh Avenue, Suite 301 Post Office Box 75638

Tampa, Florida 33675-0638


Lois Tepper, Acting General Counsel Department of Education

Turlington Building, Suite 1244

325 West Gaines Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400


Dr. Eric J. Smith, Commissioner of Education Department of Education

Turlington Building, Suite 1514

325 West Gaines Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400


Tim McGonegal, Superintendent Manatee County School Board

215 Manatee Avenue, West Bradenton, Florida 34205


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 10-008694TTS
Issue Date Proceedings
Apr. 19, 2011 Respondent's Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
Apr. 19, 2011 (Agency) Final Order Denying Respondent's Exceptions and Approving Recommended Order filed.
Mar. 24, 2011 Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
Mar. 01, 2011 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Mar. 01, 2011 Recommended Order (hearing held November 29, 2010). CASE CLOSED.
Jan. 13, 2011 Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jan. 13, 2011 Respondent's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jan. 03, 2011 Respondent's Hearing Exhibits (exhbits not available for viewing) filed.
Jan. 03, 2011 Video Teleconference Transcript of Proceedings (not available for viewing) filed.
Dec. 28, 2010 Petitioner's Exhibits List (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
Nov. 29, 2010 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Nov. 24, 2010 Petitioner's Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
Nov. 22, 2010 Respondent's Hearing Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
Nov. 17, 2010 Joint Prehearing Stipulation filed.
Oct. 07, 2010 Petitioner's Response to Respondent's First Request for Production of Documents filed.
Sep. 28, 2010 Notice of Taking Depositions filed.
Sep. 20, 2010 Order on Suspension without Pay and Granting Hearing filed.
Sep. 17, 2010 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Sep. 17, 2010 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for November 29 and 30, 2010; 9:30 a.m.; Sarasota and Tallahassee, FL).
Sep. 08, 2010 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Sep. 02, 2010 Notice of Service of Respondent's First Request for Production of Documents filed.
Sep. 01, 2010 Initial Order.
Sep. 01, 2010 Request for Evidentiary Hearing filed.
Sep. 01, 2010 Administrative Complaint filed.
Sep. 01, 2010 Recommendation for Termination filed.
Sep. 01, 2010 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 10-008694TTS
Issue Date Document Summary
Apr. 11, 2011 Agency Final Order
Mar. 01, 2011 Recommended Order Physical contact with first grader was unnecessary and sufficient to warrant termination.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer