Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: FOCUS MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC, D/B/A FOCUS HOME HEALTHCARE
Judges: WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Sep. 13, 2010
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, December 2, 2010.
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR
HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner, Case No,: 2010008044
vs.
FOCUS MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC,
d/b/a FOCUS HOME HEALTHCARE,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Agency for Health Care Administration (the
‘Agency”) and files this administrative complaint against Focus
Management Associates, LLC, d/b/a Focus Home Healthcare
(“Respondent”) and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
This is an action to impose a fine in the amount of forty-
five thousand dollars ($45,000.00), and such additional remedy
as is deemed just by this tribunal including costs of
investigation, pursuant to Chapter 400, Part III, Florida
Statutes, and Rule 59A-8.0185, Florida Administrative Code.
‘JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. The Agency has jurisdiction over the Respondent
pursuant to Chapters 400, Part III, and 408, Part II, Florida
Statutes.
2. Venue lies pursuant to Florida Administrative Code R.
28-106.207.
Page 1 of 11
Filed September 13, 2010 3:43 PM Division of Administrative Hearings.
PARTIES
3. The Agency is the licensing and enforcing authority
-for home health agencies pursuant to Chapters 400, Part III, and
408, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Chapter S59A-8, Florida
Administrative Code.
4. Respondent is a home health agency located at 200
South Hoover Boulevard, Suite 160, Tampa, Florida 33609, having
been issued license number 299992496.
5. Respondent is certified as a Medicare and Medicaid
provider.
6. At all times material to the allegations of this
administrative complaint, Respondent was a home health agency
licensed under the licensing authority of the Agency and was
required to comply with all applicable rules and statutes.
COUNT TI H365
7. The Agency re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs one
(1) through six (6), as if fully set forth in this count.
8. Section 400.474, Florida Statutes, provides:
400.474 Administrative penalties. --
(1) The agency may deny, revoke, and suspend a
license and impose an administrative fine in the
manner provided in chapter 120.
(2) Any of the following actions by a home health
agency or its employee is grounds. for disciplinary
action by the agency:
(a) Violation of this part, part II of chapter 408,
or of applicable rules.
(4) The agency shall impose a fine of $5,000 against
a home health agency that demonstrates a pattern of
Page 2 of 11
billing any payor for services not provided. A pattern
may be demonstrated by a showing of at least three
billings for services not provided within a 12-month
period. The fine must be imposed for each incident
that is falsely billed. The agency may also:
(a) Require payback of all funds; —
(b) Revoke the license; or
(c) Issue a moratorium in accordance with a, 408.814.
9, Section 400.484, Florida Statutes, provides:
400.484 Right of inspection; deficiencies; fines. --
(1) In addition to the requirements of s. 408.811,
the agency may make such inspections and
investigations as are necessary in order to determine
the state of compliance with this part, part II of
chapter 408, and applicable rules.
(3) In addition to any other penalties imposed
pursuant to this section or part, the agency may
assess costs related to an investigation that results
in a successful prosecution, excluding costs
associated with an attorney's time.
10, The Agency completed a complaint investigation survey
of the Respondent on July 12, 2010.
11. Based on review of clinical records, policies and
procedures, memos, supply requisition forms, Respondent's
billing documentation, and staff interviews, the Agency
determined that the Respondent home health agency billed
Medicare for services not rendered, in three of three patients’
clinical records reviewed and in nine of nine individual billing
episodes reviewed for those three patients.
12. Review of Patient #1's clinical record revealed a
start of care date of 4/5/10. There was no documentation and/or
valid documentation of requests for medical supplies in Patient
Page 3 of 11
#1's clinical record. There were two medical supply requisition
forms in the chart dated 4/21/10 and 6/2/10, There were no
signatures on the areas for authorizing signatures that the
request was approved and/or the patient received the supplies.
Neither form was signed by authorized personnel and the form
dated 6/2/10 did not indicate how many of the items were needed.
13. Additionally, the Respondent home health agency was
unable to provide any further documentation/evidence as to
exactly what supplies the patient received versus for what
Medicare was billed.
14. Review of Patient #2's clinical record revealed a
start of care date of 04/08/10. There was no documentation
and/or valid documentation of requests for medical supplies in
Patient #2's clinical record. There was one medical supply
requisition form in the chart dated 04/08/10. There was no
signature on the area for authorizing signatures that the
request was approved and/or the patient received the supplies
and the form fails to indicate how many of the items were
needed,
15. Additionally, the Respondent home health agency was
unable to provide any further documentation/evidence as to
exactly what supplies the patient received versus for what
Medicare was billed.
16. Review of.Patient #3's clinical record revealed a
Page 4 of 11
start of care date of 03/31/10. There was no documentation of
any requests for medical supplies in Patient #3's clinical
record.
17. Additionally, the Respondent home health agency was
unable to provide any further documentation/evidence as to
exactly what supplies the patient received versus for what
Medicare was billed.
18. The Agency surveyor’s review of Respondent's policies
and procedures manual failed to reveal any policies or
procedures related to supply usage, ordering, tracking, or
billing.
19. A memo dated 04/14/10, from the Respondent’‘s
Administrator to office staff stated: "Please note that ordering
of supplies needs to be closely monitored and properly
documented. Effective immediately, the ordering of supplies
needs to be documented via supply ordering form that needs to be
reviewed and signed off by case managers prior to completing the
final bill audit that is being submitted to Cynthia Paul."
20. The Agency’s surveyor made a request for documentation
of the bills submitted to Medicare for the patients. Review of
the Medicare billings provided by Respondent to the Agency's
surveyor revealed there were supplies listed on each billing
episode as follows and all supplies were listed as "Non-Routine"
and "1" Service Unit:
Page 5 of 11
20.a) Patient #1: 04/05/09-06/03/09, $375.00;
06/04/09-08/02/09, $175.00; 08/03/09-10/12/09, $375.00;
10/02/09-11/30/09, $175.00; 12/01/09-01/29/10, $175.00;
01/30/10-03/30/10, $40.00; 03/31/10-05/29/10, $40.00. There
were no further details listed as to what the supplies were.
20.b) Patient #2: 04/08/10-06/06/10, $40.00
20.¢c) Patient #3: 03/31/10-05/29/10, $40.00
21. %In an interview with the Biller for Medicare, on
7/12/10 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the Biller confirmed the
Agency surveyor’s findings. She indicated there is a supply
list called Medical Supply Requisition ("MSR”) which the skilled
nurses (“SN”) are required to fill out and then they give it to
the Case Manager or Managers. Her desk is actually located in
the supply room and she said she tries to remind the nurses
every time they enter the room that if they are taking out
supplies they need to fill out and turn in the MSR form. "You
tell them and you tell them but they just don't get the
importance of this and that it is company policy." She stated
the process is that the SN fills in the patient's name and the
.date on the MSR form, chooses the supply needed and marks how
many of them are needed and writes in any supplies needed that
are not already preprinted on the form. The MSR form is to then
to be given to the Case Manager (“CM”) or Director of Nursing
(“DON”) who approves the need for the supplies and then this
Page 6 of 11
information is to be entered in Visitrak, a tracking/billing
system the Respondent home health agency utilizes. Then "I get
a paper that has the patient's name and episode on it from the
case manager that lets me know when to bill a patient episode."
The CM or DON enter supplies and visits in Visitrack and the
software generates the claim and it is then submitted
electronically. The MSR form is then supposed to be placed into
the patient's clinical record,
22. The Biller reviewed patient clinical records for
Patients #1, #2, and #3 to review for documentation of MSR forms
in patient records. She was only able to find one form in
Patient #1's clinical record dated 4/21/10. There was no
further documentation of any MSR forms in the clinical record
for Patient #1, #2, or #3.
23. The Agency’s surveyor conducted an interview with the
Administrator, Co-Owner, and RN #2 on 7/12/10 at approximately
2:00 p.m. Questions and responses were as follows:
23,a) Are there were any policies and procedures
related to medical supplies and billing? Co-owner, "Only a
memo to the staff." She provided a copy of memo.
23.b) Did anyone at the Respondent home health agency
bill Medicare patients directly for supplies or services? Co-
owner - "Never"
23.c) How can you tell what supplies are used for a
Page 7 of 11
patient as opposed to what was ordered in general or
specifically for patients? Co-owner - "They should be able to
tell by having a discussion. The skilled nurse in the field
should be telling the case manager what was used. Nurses in
the field make multiple request forms for patients. We have
assumed that what was ordered was used. Maybe this is a
mistake to assume this."
23.d) What is your checks and balance system for
supplies? Co-owner - "Case manager and biller - it's between
them. They have to verify what they used and what they
billed. .
24. %In the presence of RN #2, Respondent’s Administrator
and Respondent's co-owner, the Agency’s surveyor interviewed RN
#1 on 7/12/10 at approximately 2:30 p.m, RN #1 is the
Respondent's staff nurse who has provided services to Patient
#1. RN #1 stated to her knowledge the patient "had been buying
his/her own supplies" and only now "the last time, the last
month” was the Respondent home health agency being responsible
for getting the patient her supplies. At this point, the Co-
owner denied that she was aware of this; she stated to her
knowledge the Respondent home health agency had been getting the
patient's supplies.
25. Interview with the Respondents administrator and co-
owners on 7/12/10 at approximately 5:00 p.m. revealed they had
Page 8 of 11
no further documentation to provide and confirmed/agreed with
findings.
26. As set forth above, during a:twelve month period
Medicare was billed for supplies for Patient #1 on seven (7)
occasions, but Respondent had no documentation of what supplies
were billed to Medicare, and Respondent had no documentation
that Patient #1 ever received whatever was billed to Medicare.
Moreover, Respondent’s employee who wag Patient #1’s caregiver
stated to the Agency's surveyor that during this period Patient
#1 purchased the supplies used for Patient #1. Also as set
forth above, the records of two other of Respondent's patients,
Patients #2 and #3, similarly each showed one bill to Medicare
for which Respondent had no documentation of what supplies were
billed to Medicare, and Respondent had no documentation that
Patient #1 ever received whatever was billed to Medicare. These
facts demonstrate a pattern of billing Medicare for services not
provided, and warrant a fine of $5,000 for each of the nine
Medicare billings.
WHEREFORE, the Agency intends to impose a fine in the
amount of forty-five thousand dollars ($45,000.00) plus
investigative costs to be determined by this tribunal, pursuant
to Chapter 400, Part III, Florida Statutes, and Rule Chapter
59A-8, Florida Administrative Code.
Page 9 of 11
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Respondent is notified that it has a right to request an
administrative hearing pursuant to Section 120.569, Florida
Statutes. Respondent has the right to retain, and be
represented by an attorney in this matter. Specific options for
administrative action are set out in the attached Election of
Rights.
All requests for hearing shall be made to the Agency for Health
Care Administration, and delivered to Agency Clerk, Agency for
Health Care Administration, 2727 Mahan Drive, Bldg #3, MS #3,
Tallahassee, FL 32308, whose telephone number is 850-412-3630.
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO REQUEST A
HEARING WITHIN 21 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT WILL RESULT
IN AN ADMISSION OF THE FACTS ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT AND THE
ENTRY OF A FINAL ORDER BY THE AGENCY.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the
‘foregoing has been served by U.S. Certified Mail, Return Receipt
No. 7009 3410 0000 0172 6378 to Phillip Krivoruk, Administrator,
Focus Home Healthcare, 200 South Hoover Boulevard, Suite 200,
Tampa, Florida 33609, and by regular U.S. Mail to Natalie
Krivoruk, Registered Agent for Focus Management Associates, LLC,
200 South Hoover Boulevard, Suite 200, Tampa, Florida 33609, on
August {9 , 2010.
\\ sens of Hse
es H, Harris, Esq.
sgistant General Counsel.
Fla. Bar. No. 817775
Agency for Health Care Administration
525 Mirror Lake Drive, 330D .
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
727-552-1944 (office)
727-552-1440 (facsimile)
Page 10 of 11
Copies furnished to:
Phillip Krivoruk, Administrator,
Focus Home Healthcare
200 South Hoover Boulevard,
Suite 200
Natalie Krivoruk, Registered
Agent for Focus Management
Associates, LLC
200 South Hoover Boulevard
Tampa, Florida 33609 Suite 200
(U.S. Certified Mail) Tampa, Florida 33609
(U.S. Mail)
James H, Harris, Esquire
Agency for Health Care Admin.
525 Mirror Lake Drive, #330D
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
(Interoffice Mail)
Patricia R. Caufman
Field Office Manager
525 Mirror Lake Dr., 4™" Floor
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
(Interoffice)
Page 11 of 11
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
RE: Focus Management Associates, LLC, CASE NO. 2010008044
d/b/a Focus Home Healthcare
ELECTION OF RIGHTS
This Election of Rights form is attached to a proposed action by the Agency for Health Care
Administration (AHCA). The title may be Notice of Intent to Impose a Late Fee, Notice of
Intent to Impose a Late Fine or Administrative Complaint.
Your Election of Rights must be returned by mail or by fax within 21 days of the day you
receive the attached Notice of Intent to Impose a Late Fee, Notice of Intent to impose a Late Fine
or Administrative Complaint.
If your Election of Rights with your selected option is not received by AHCA within twenty-
one (21) days from the date you received this notice of proposed action by AHCA, you will have
given up your right to contest the Agency’s proposed action and a final order will be issued.
(Please use this form unless you, your attorney or your representative prefer to reply according to
Chapter120, Florida Statutes (2006) and Rule 28, Florida Administrative Code.)
PLEASE RETURN YOUR ELECTION OF RIGHTS TO THIS ADDRESS:
Agency for Health Care Administration
Attention: Agency Clerk
2727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop #3
Tallahassee, Florida 32308.
Phone: 850-412-3630 Fax: 850-921-0158.
PLEASE SELECT QNLY 1 OF THESE 3 OPTIONS
OPTION ONE (1), I admit to the allegations of facts and law contained in the Notice
of Intent to Impose a Late Fine or Fee, or Administrative Complaint and I waive my right to
object and to have a hearing. I understand that by giving up my right to a hearing, a final order
will be issued that adopts the proposed agency action and imposes the penalty, fine or action.
OPTION TWO (2) I admit to the allegations of facts contained in the Notice of Intent
to Impose a Late Fee, the Notice of Intent to Impose a Late Fine, or Administrative
Complaint, but I wish to be heard at an informal proceeding (pursuant to Section 120.57(2),
Florida Statutes) where 1 may submit testimony and written evidence to the Agency to show that
the proposed administrative action is too severe or that the fine should be reduced.
OPTION THREE (3)____I dispute the allegations of fact contained in the Notice of Intent
to Impose a Late Fee, the Notice of Intent to Impose a Late Fine, or Administrative
Complaint, and I request a formal hearing (pursuant to Subsection 120.57(1), Florida Statutes)
before an Administrative Law Judge appointed by the Division of Administrative Hearings.
Docket for Case No: 10-009052
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Dec. 02, 2010 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Nov. 23, 2010 |
Joint Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Nov. 16, 2010 |
Order Denying Continuance of Final Hearing.
|
Nov. 15, 2010 |
Joint Motion for Continuance filed.
|
Nov. 05, 2010 |
Agency's Response to Respondent's First Request for Production to the Agency for Health Care Administration filed.
|
Sep. 23, 2010 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Sep. 23, 2010 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for December 16 and 17, 2010; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Sep. 22, 2010 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Sep. 14, 2010 |
Agency's Counsel's Notice of Unavailability filed.
|
Sep. 14, 2010 |
Initial Order.
|
Sep. 13, 2010 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Sep. 13, 2010 |
Order of Dismissal without Prejudice Pursuant to Section 120.569(2)(c), Florida Statutes, to Allow for Amendment and Resubmission of Petition filed.
|
Sep. 13, 2010 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Proceeding filed.
|
Sep. 13, 2010 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|
Sep. 13, 2010 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|