Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SANDRA M. MINNIE vs WAL-MART STORES, INC., 10-010316 (2010)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 10-010316 Visitors: 26
Petitioner: SANDRA M. MINNIE
Respondent: WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Judges: W. DAVID WATKINS
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Nov. 22, 2010
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, October 5, 2012.

Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2012
Summary: The issue is whether Respondent engaged in an unlawful employment practice pursuant to chapter 760, Florida Statutes, against Petitioner due to her age.Petitioner did not establish she was the victim of age discrimination, or that she was constructively discharged because of her age.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


SANDRA M. MINNIE, EEOC Case No. NONE


Petitioner, FCHR Case No. 2010-01613


v. DOAH Case No. 10-10316


WAL-MART STORES, INC., FCHR Order No. 12-069


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM AN UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner Sandra M. Minnie filed a complaint of discrimination pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Sections 760.01 - 760.11, Florida Statutes (2009), alleging that Respondent Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., committed unlawful employment practices on the basis of Petitioner’s age (DOB: 5-9-50) by harassing Petitioner, and by subjecting Petitioner to different terms and conditions of employment.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on October 25, 2010, the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice, and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held by video teleconference on July 11, 2012, and by teleconference on August 23, 2012, at sites in Tampa and Tallahassee, Florida, before Administrative Law Judge W. David Watkins.

Judge Watkins issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated October 5, 2012.

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.


Findings of Fact


We find the Administrative Law Judge’s findings of fact to be supported by competent substantial evidence.

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s findings of fact.


Filed December 19, 2012 11:00 AM Division of Administrative Hearings


Conclusions of Law


We find the Administrative Law Judge’s application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s conclusions of law.


Exceptions


Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Order.


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110.


DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of December , 2012. FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:


Commissioner Gilbert M. Singer, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Lizzette Romano; and

Commissioner Mario M. Valle


Filed this 19th day of December , 2012, in Tallahassee, Florida.


/s/ Violet Crawford, Clerk

Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 488-7082


Copies furnished to:


Sandra M. Minnie

309 West Fairground Street Marion, OH 43302


Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

c/o Amy R. Harrison Turci, Esq. Ford and Harrison, LLP

225 Water Street, Suite 710

Jacksonville, FL 32202


W. David Watkins, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel


I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this 19th day of December , 2012.


By: /s/ Clerk of the Commission

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 10-010316
Issue Date Proceedings
Dec. 19, 2012 Agency Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
Oct. 05, 2012 Recommended Order (hearing held July 11 and August 23, 2012). CASE CLOSED.
Oct. 05, 2012 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Sep. 17, 2012 Respondent's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Sep. 13, 2012 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Sep. 07, 2012 Transcript of Proceedings (not available for viewing) filed.
Sep. 05, 2012 Respondent's Notice of Receipt of Final Hearing Transcript filed.
Aug. 23, 2012 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Aug. 06, 2012 Order Re-scheduling Hearing by Telephone (hearing set for August 23, 2012; 2:00 p.m.; Tampa, FL).
Aug. 03, 2012 Status Report filed.
Jul. 27, 2012 Petitioner's Proposed Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing)
Jul. 11, 2012 CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to date not certain.
Jul. 10, 2012 Respondent's Notice of Filing (Proposed) Exhibits filed.
Jul. 10, 2012 Order Denying Emergency Motion for Continuance.
Jul. 10, 2012 Emergency Motion for Continuance of Hearing Date filed.
Apr. 27, 2012 Order Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for July 11, 2012; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
Apr. 25, 2012 Status Report filed.
Feb. 29, 2012 Wal-Mart's Second Requests for Production to Petitioner filed.
Feb. 20, 2012 Order Canceling Hearing and Placing Case in Abeyance (parties to advise status by April 20, 2012).
Feb. 16, 2012 Response in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Appear Telephonically at Final Hearing filed.
Feb. 15, 2012 Amended Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for February 21, 2012; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa and Tallahassee, FL; amended as to venue).
Feb. 15, 2012 Notice of Ex-parte Communication.
Feb. 14, 2012 Letter to DOAH from S. Mimmie requesting a telephonic hearing filed.
Feb. 13, 2012 Respondent's Motion to Relocate the Final Hearing filed.
Nov. 04, 2011 Order Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for February 21, 2012; 9:30 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
Nov. 04, 2011 Notice of Ex-parte Communication.
Nov. 03, 2011 Letter to DOAH from S. Minnie regarding the final hearing filed.
Oct. 26, 2011 Order to Show Cause.
Oct. 25, 2011 Notice of Petitioner's Failure to Reschedule Final Hearing filed.
Feb. 21, 2011 Order Canceling Hearing, Placing Case in Abeyance and Requiring Status (parties to advise status by March 23, 2011).
Feb. 21, 2011 Joint Emergency Motion for Continuance of Hearing Date filed.
Feb. 16, 2011 Amended Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for February 22, 2011; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa and Tallahassee, FL; amended as to partial venue).
Feb. 14, 2011 Respondent's Witness and Exhibit List filed.
Jan. 25, 2011 Notice of Deposition (of S. Minnie) filed.
Jan. 12, 2011 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for February 22, 2011; 9:00 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
Dec. 29, 2010 Wal-Mart's Notice of Serving First Set of Interrogatories filed.
Dec. 29, 2010 Wal-Mart's First Request for Production to Petitioner filed.
Dec. 14, 2010 Notice of Appearance (Betty Joseph) filed.
Dec. 14, 2010 Respondent's Motion for Continuance of Hearing Date filed.
Dec. 14, 2010 Notice of Appearance (Amy Harrison Turci) filed.
Dec. 03, 2010 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Dec. 03, 2010 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for December 30, 2010; 9:30 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
Nov. 22, 2010 Employment Complaint of Discrimination filed.
Nov. 22, 2010 Notice of Determination: No Cause filed.
Nov. 22, 2010 Determination: No Cause filed.
Nov. 22, 2010 Petition for Relief filed.
Nov. 22, 2010 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.
Nov. 22, 2010 Initial Order.

Orders for Case No: 10-010316
Issue Date Document Summary
Dec. 19, 2012 Agency Final Order
Oct. 05, 2012 Recommended Order Petitioner did not establish she was the victim of age discrimination, or that she was constructively discharged because of her age.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer