Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Respondent: JAMES (CLIFF) K. WALKER, D/B/A WALKER'S SEPTIC TANK SERVICE
Judges: ROBERT S. COHEN
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Graceville, Florida
Filed: Dec. 15, 2010
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, January 19, 2011.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
~ 10-1005
STATE OF FLORIDA _
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PQ ucy
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
STATE OF FLORIDA,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
Petitioner, SEPTIC TANK CONTRACTOR
REGISTRATION NO. SRO890612
AUTHORIZATION NO. SA0061361
vs. RE: HSES COMPLAINTS. SC1386
. andSC1406
REGISTRATION REVOCATION
JAMES’ (CLIFF) K. WALKER, d/b/a AUTHORIZATION REVOCATION
WALKER'S SEPTIC TANK SERVICE
Post Office Box 715
Graceville, FL 32440,
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
The State of Florida, Department of Health, imposes revocation of
Septic Tank Contractor Registration No. SRO890612 and Authorization No.
SA0061361 twenty-one (21) days after the date of service of this
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT for the following events and violations:
JURISDICTION
1. The Department, an agency of the State of Florida, has
jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to the provisions of Chapters 120, 381,
386, and 489, Florida Statutes. [Section 381.0065(3)(a, b and h) and (4),
Florida statutes] The agency rules which govern part of this matter are
Chapter 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code.
DOH. v WALKER - Page 1 of 9
COUNT I
Contracted work is completed without a permit
2. Respondent, JAMES (CLIFF) K. WALKER, owns and operates
WALKER'S SEPTIC TANK SERVICE and is a registered septic tank contractor
with the Florida Department of Health pursuant to Part III, Chapter 489, and
Section 381.0065, Florida Statutes.
3. At all times pertinent to this complaint, James (Cliff) Walker
was registered as a licensed as a septic tank contractor under Registration
SRO931141 and Authorization SA0890161 to use the name WALKER'S
SEPTIC TANK SERVICE. .
4. On or about January 10, 2009, Respondent repaired a septic
tank system consisting of a tank and drainfield located at the residence of
‘Larry and Carol Peters, 1319 Beaver Dam Road, Bonifay, Florida 32425. The
department became aware of this repair when issuing a permit for a repair on
December 30, 2009, to Davy Odom of Odom Septic Tank Service. The
permit cost $350.00 and was issued on 12/30/09. The required repairs cost
$700.00 on 1/10/09 and another charge of $2,150.00 on 3/30/10 for a total
cost of $3,200.00.. The work of Walker Septic Tank Co. on or about January
10, 2009, was not performed under the authority of an issued permit. The
work of Walker Septic Tank Co. on or about January 10, 2009, was not
inspected for construction standards compliance nor was a final or any other
inspection called for by Respondent. The work of Walker Septic Tank Co. on
or about January 10, 2009, failed to meet construction standards by installing
a drainfield substantially inadequate in size and contrary to required
DOH v WALKER - Page 2 of 9
construction standards.
5. A person may not construct, repair, modify abandon, or
operate an onsite sewage treatment and disposal system [Septic
Tank system] without first obtaining a permit approved by the
department.” Sec. 381.0065(4), Florida Statutes.
6. Respondent’s installation of a drainfield without a permit is a
violation of Disciplinary Guidelines:
Permit violations where contracted work is completed without a
permit having been issued . . .. First violation, letter of warning or
fine up to $1000; repeat violation, revocation. (Rule 64E-
6.022(1)(b)2., Florida Administrative Code)
COUNT II
Failure to Call for Required Inspections
7. | Paragraphs 2 through 4 in Count I are incorporated in this Count
as if herein restated in full.
8. Respondent's failure to call for required inspections is a violation
of Disciplinary Guidelines:
Failure to call for required inspections. First violation, letter of
warning or fine up to $500; repeat violation, letter of warning or
fine up to $500 and 90 day suspension or revocation. (Rule 64E-
6.022(1)(d), Florida Administrative Code)
COUNT IIT
Gross negligence, incompetence, or misconduct
9. Paragraphs 2 through 4 in Count I are incorporated in this Count
as if herein restated in full.
DOH v WALKER - Page 3 of 9
10. Respondent’s installation of a septic tank system repair without
a permit and with an undersized drainfield is-negligence, incompetence, or
misconduct which is aggravated by causing monetary harm to the customer,
Larry and Carol Peters, and is a violation of Disciplinary Guidelines:
Gross negligence, incompetence, or misconduct which . . . Causes
monetary... harm to a customer .. .. First violation, letter of
warning or fine up to $500 and 90 day suspension; repeat
violation, $500 fine and revocation. (Rule 64E-6.022(1)(1)2.,
Florida Administrative Code)
COUNT IV
Installation in Violation of Standards
11. | Paragraphs 2 through 4 in Count I are incorporated in this Count
as if herein restated in full.
12. The drainfield installed by Respondent was 100 square feet but
the required drainfield size is 420 square feet as specified according to the
soil type and house size in accordance with Rule 64E-6.008, Florida
Administrative Code.
13. Respondent’s installation of a septic tank system repair with an
undersized drainfield is a violation of Disciplinary Guidelines:
Installation, modification, or repair of an onsite sewage treatment
and disposal system in violation of the standards of Section
381.0065 or 381.00655, F.S., or Chapter 64E-6, F.A.C. First
violation, letter of warning or fine up to $500 per specific standard
violated; repeat violation, 90 day suspension or revocation. (Rule
64E-6.022(1)(p), Florida Administrative Code)
DOH v WALKER - Page 4 of 9
COUNT V
Practicing Fraud or Deceit
14. On or about April 12, 2010, a construction inspection was
performed on 1536 Will Lee Road, Bonifay, Florida 32425, after which
Respondent was authorized by the department to cover the drainfield. After
the construction inspection and before a final inspection on April 13, 2010,
Respondent removed a section of drainfield from the subject installation and
placed the fill cover over the now undersized drainfield.
15. Respondent's undisclosed and unauthorized removal of a section
of drainfield after the construction inspection approval is fraud or deceit and
is a violation of Disciplinary Guidelines:
Practicing fraud or deceit, making misleading or untrue
representations. First violation, letter of warning or fine up to
$500; repeat violation, revocation. (Rule 64E-6.022(1)(k), Florida
Administrative Code)
MITIGATION AND AGGRAVATION
16. 1998 prior discipline: Case Number SC0412, for unlawful
disposal of septage, $300.00 fine; Rule 64E-6.022(1)(n), Florida
Administrative Code.
17. 2000 prior discipline: Improper dumping of sewage on an
unpermitted site, $1,000.00 settlement for violation of Rule 64E-6.022(1)(n _
and q), Florida Administrative Code.
DOH v WALKER - Page 5 of 9
18. 2007 prior discipline: Stipulated Settlement of $5,000.00 fine,
Count I: a contractor employee, contractor's son, assaulted a department
employee, in violation of Sec. 381.0061(1); Count II: Gross misconduct
without monetary harm, Rule 64E-6.022(1)(I)1, Florida Administrative Code;
Count III: Gross misconduct which causes monetary harm to a customer,
Rule 64E-6.022(1)(1)2, Florida Administrative Code.
19. The above are repeat violations of disciplinary guidelines.
20. = Mitigation and aggravation are applied according to the following
Rule 64E-6.022, Florida Administrative Code provisions:
(1) It shall be the responsibility of persons registered under this
rule to see that work for which they have contracted and which
has been performed by them or under their supervision is
carried out in conformance with the requirements of all
applicable Florida Statutes and Chapter 64E-6, F.A.C. The
following actions by a person included under this rule shall be
deemed unethical and subject to penalties as set forth in this
section. The penalties listed shall be used as guidelines in
disciplinary cases, absent aggravating or mitigating
circumstances and subject to other provisions of this section.
* * *
(k) Practicing fraud or deceit, making misleading or untrue
representations. First violation, letter of warning or fine up to
$500; repeat violation, revocation.
* * *
(1) Gross negligence, incompetence, or misconduct which:
1. Causes no monetary or other harm to a customer, or physical
harm to. any person. First violation, letter of warning or fine up
to $500; repeat violation, $500 fine and 90 day suspension or
revocation.
- 2,.Causes monetary or other harm to a customer, or physical
harm to any person. First violation, letter of warning or fine up
to $500 and 90 day suspension; repeat violation, $500 fine and
revocation.
(2) Circumstances which shall be considered for the purposes of
mitigation or aggravation of penalty shall include the following:
DOH v WALKER - Page 6 of 9
(a) Monetary or other damage to the registrant’s customer, in
any way associated with the violation, which damage the
registrant has not relieved, as of the time the penalty is to be
assessed.
(b)-Actual job-site violations of this rule or conditions exhibiting
gross negligence, incompetence or misconduct by the
contractor, which have not been corrected as of the time the
penalty is being assessed. :
(c) The severity of the offense.
(d) The danger to the public.
(e) The number of repetitions of the offense.
(f) The number of complaints filed against the contractor.
(g) The length of time the contractor has practiced and
registration category.
(h) The actual damiage, physica! or otherwise, to the customer.
(i) The effect of the penalty upon the contractor’s livelihood.
(j) Any efforts at rehabilitation.
(k) Any other mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
21. Respondent has been a Septic Tank Contractor since
March 31, 1989.
WHEREFORE, the Department having applied due mitigation
and aggravation REVOKES the Septic Tank Contractor Registration No.
SRO890612 and Authorization No. SA0061361 of JAMES (CLIFF) K.
WALKER, effective 21 days after service of this document unless appealed as
below stated.
NOTICE OF RIGHTS TO APPEAL
A party who is adversely affected by this action may petition for an
administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida
Statutes. Such proceedings are governed by Chapter 28-106, Florida
Administrative Code. A petition for a hearing must be in writing and must be
DOH v WALKER - Page 7 of 9
received by the Agency Clerk for the Department within 21 days from receipt
of this action. The address for the Agency Clerk is: R.S. Power, 4052 Bald
Cypress Way, BIN #A02, Tallahassee, FL 32399-1703. The facsimile number
is (850) 413-8743. See attached document, Election of Rights. .
Mediation is not available as an alternative remedy.
FAILURE TO SUBMIT A PETITION FOR HEARING WITHIN 21
DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES WAIVER OF
YOUR RIGHT TO AN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING, AND THIS
DOCUMENT BECOMES A FINAL ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT
REVOKING YOUR REGISTRATION AND AUTHORIZATION AS A SEPTIC
TANK CONTRACTOR.
A party who is adversely affected by a final order is entitled to judicial
review pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are
governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings may
be commenced by filing one copy of a Notice of Appeal with the Agency Clerk
of the Department of Health and a second copy accompanied by the filing
fees required by law with the District Court of Appeal in the appellate district
where the party resides or the First District Court of Appeal. The notice must
be filed within 30 days of the rendition of a final order.
DOH v WALKER - Page 8 of 9
_CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing and Election
of Rights form have been furnished to JAMES (CLIFF) K. WALKER, d/b/a
WALKER'S SEPTIC TANK SERVICE, Post Office Box 715, Graceville, FL 32440,
by Certified U.S. wel No. 70033110000646813470 and by regular U.S. Mail
on this the GE; dy ot Muenace 2010.
Depaftmenff Health
Northwest Law Office
1295 West Fairfield Drive
Pensacola, Florida 32501
(850) 595-6517,
FAX (850) 595-6530
CC: R.S. Power, Agency Clerk
Florida Department of Health
4052 Bald Cypress Way —- Bin A02
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1703
DOH v WALKER - Page 9 of 9
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
STATE OF FLORIDA,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
Petitioner, SEPTIC TANK CONTRACTOR
REGISTRATION NO. SRO890612
AUTHORIZATION NO. SA0061361
vs. RE: HSES COMPLAINTS SC1386
and SC1406
REGISTRATION REVOCATION
JAMES (CLIFF) K. WALKER, d/b/a AUTHORIZATION REVOCATION
WALKER'S SEPTIC TANK SERVICE
Post Office Box 715
Graceville, FL 32440,
Respondent.
ELECTION OF RIGHTS
(Please select only 1 of the 3 options)
I have read the Explanation of Rights and understand my
options.
1. () I do not dispute the allegations of fact in the
Administrative Complaint, but do wish to be accorded an informal
hearing or proceeding, pursuant to § 120.57(2), Florida Statutes, at
which time I will be permitted to submit oral and/or written evidence
to the Department, in mitigation of the complaint. Most informal
hearings are conducted at agency headquarters in Tallahassee, Florida.
2. (_) Ido not dispute the allegations of fact contained
in the Administrative Complaint and waive my right to object or be
heard.
3. ( ) I do dispute the allegations of fact contained in
the Administrative Complaint and wish to petition for a hearing
pursuant to § 120.57(1), Florida Statutes. Below I have identified
each fact I dispute (attach extra pages as needed):
Note: Mediation pursuant to § 120.573, Florida Statutes, is not
_ available
for this action.
Disputed Facts:
Respondent's Signature and Date
Docket for Case No: 10-010605