Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE
Respondent: JACINTA IRENE GILLIS, M.D.
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Fort Myers, Florida
Filed: Aug. 11, 2011
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, October 4, 2011.
Latest Update: Oct. 05, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
PETITIONER,
Vv. CASE NO.: 2008-20661
JACINTA IRENE GILLIS, M.D.,
RESPONDENT.
ey |
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its
undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint before the
Board of Medicine against Respondent, Jacinta Irene Gillis, M.D., and in
support thereof alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the
practice of medicine pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida Statutes; Chapter
456, Florida Statutes; and Chapter 458, Florida Statutes.
2. At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent was a
ticensed physician within the State of Florida, having been issued license
number ME 99298.
Filed August 11, 2011 3:58 PM Division of Administrative Hearings
3. Respondent’s address of record is 12446 Pebble Stone Court,
Fort Myers, Florida, 33913.
4. At all times material to this cause between June 2008 and
December 2008, Respondent treated patients R.S., D.H., M.N., and A.W.
5. The Department of Health (Department) initiated an
investigation of Respondent based on an undercover investigation
conducted by the Pinellas County Sheriffs Office (PCSO).
6. It was alleged that Respondent was issuing prescriptions for
controlled substances to undercover agents of the PCSO without
conducting adequate physical examinations.
7. The types of controlled substances in question that were
prescribed by Respondent are listed as follows:
a) Oxycodone (opioid) is commonly prescribed to treat pain.
According to Section 893.03(2), Florida Statutes, oxycodone is a
Schedule I controlled substance that has a high potential for abuse
and has a currently accepted but severely restricted medical use in
treatment in the United States. Abuse of oxycodone may lead to
severe psychological or physical dependence.
b) Percocet (opioid) is the brand name for the formulation of
oxycodone and acetaminophen and is prescribed to treat pain.
C) Alprazolam (benzodiazepine) is often sold under the
brand name Xanax, and is prescribed to treat anxiety. According to
Section 893.03(4), Florida Statutes, alprazolam is a Schedule IV
controlled substance that has a low potential for abuse relative to the
substances in Schedule III and has a currently accepted medical use
in treatment in the United States. Abuse of the substance may lead
to limited physical or psychological dependence relative to the
substances in Schedule III.
d) Carisoprodol, commonly known by the brand name Soma,
is a muscle relaxant prescribed to treat muscular pain. According to
Section 893.03(4), Florida Statutes, carisoprodol is a Schedule IV
controlled substance that has a low potential for abuse relative to the
substances in Schedule III and has a currently accepted medical use
in treatment in the United States. Abuse of carisoprodol may lead to
limited physical or psychological dependence relative to the
substances in Schedule III.
8. In medicine, a proper medical assessment includes the patient's
prior medical history, prior pain management treatment history, intensity of
pain, factors that make the pain worse or alleviate the pain, the pain’s
intensity and location, verification of prior controlled substance
prescriptions including the date and quantity of the last prescription
received, name of the previous treating physician, name and address of the
pharmacy where the last controlled substance prescriptions were filled
together with all relevant contact information and verification of all the
foregoing by the physician personally contacting the previous pharmacy
and treating physician, together with the reason for the referral, and
verification for the reasons of referral with the prior treating physician.
FACTS SPECIFIC TO R.S.
9. On or about August 27, 2008, R.S. presented to Respondent
with complaints of back and shoulder pain.
10. Respondent’s medical records show that she prescribed
Percocet 10/325, ninety (90) pills to R.S.
11. Respondent did not obtain any medical documentation, records,
or correspondence from any other physician of R.S.
12. Respondent did not perform a thorough and complete medical
assessment of R.S.
13. Respondent did not accurately and completely document
performing a complete medical assessment of R.S. or accurately and
completely document any medical justification for not doing so.
14. Respondent did not review medical records from other
physicians, pharmacists, or health care professionals of R.S.
15. Respondent did not accurately and completely document
reviewing any medical records from other physicians, pharmacists, or
health care professionals of R.S., or accurately and completely document
any medical justification for not doing so.
16. Respondent did not communicate with R.S.’s previous
physicians, pharmacists, or health care professionals.
17, Respondent did not accurately and completely document
communicating with R.S.’s previous physicians, pharmacists, or health care
professionals, or accurately and completely document any justification for
“not doing so.
18. Respondent did not perform a urine drug screen.
19. Respondent did not accurately and completely document
performing a urine drug screen, or accurately and completely document
justification for not doing so.
20. Respondent’s medical record did not adequately provide
justification for the prescribing of Percocet as described in paragraph ten
(10) to R.S.
FACTS SPECIFIC TO D.H.
21. From on or about August 4, 2008 to on or about August 27,
2008 D.H. presented to Respondent with complaints of back and neck pain.
22. Respondent's medical records show she prescribed one
hundred twenty (120) pills of oxycodone thirty (30) mg. and ninety (90)
pills of Motrin six hundred (600) mg. on August 4, 2008.
23. Respondent's medical records show she prescribed one
hundred twenty (120) pills of oxycodone thirty (30) mg. on August 27°,
2008.
24. Respondent did not obtain any medical documentation, records,
or correspondence from any other physician of D.H.
25. Respondent did not perform a complete and thorough medical
assessment of patient D.H.
26. Respondent did not accurately and completely document
performing a complete medical assessment, or accurately and completely
document any medical justification for not doing so.
27. Respondent did not obtain or review prior medical records from
any other physician, pharmacist, or health care professional.
28. Respondent did not accurately and completely document
reviewing any medical records from any other physician, pharmacist, or
health care professional or accurately and completely document any
medical justification for not doing so.
29. Respondent did not obtain a urine drug screen.
30. Respondent did not provide justification in the medical records
for prescribing oxycodone 30 mg as described in paragraphs twenty two
(22) and twenty three (23).
FACTS SPECIFIC TO M.N.
31. From on or about June 23, 2008 through on or about
November 10, 2008 M.N. presented to Respondent with complaints of
lower back, left knee and right shoulder pain.
32. On or about June 23, 2008 Respondent prescribed sixty (60)
pills of Xanax 1 mg. and two hundred ten (210) pills of oxycodone 30 mg.
33. On or about July 18, 2008 Respondent prescribed thirty (30)
pills of amoxicillin five hundred (500) mg. and two hundred ten (210) pills
of oxycodone 30 mg.
34. On August 13, 2008 Respondent prescribed one hundred eighty
(180) pills of oxycodone 30 mg.
35. On September 10, 2008 Respondent prescribed two hundred
ten (210) pills of oxycodone 30 mg.
36. On October 7, 2008 Respondent prescribed one hundred eighty
(180) pills of oxycodone 30 mg.
37, On November 10, 2008 Respondent prescribed one hundred
fifty (150) pills of oxycodone 30 mg.
38. Respondent did not perform a thorough and complete physical
examination of M.N.
39. Respondent did not obtain a urine screen of M.N.
40. Respondent did not perform a complete and thorough medical
assessment of M.N.
41. Respondent did not accurately and completely document
performing a complete medical assessment of M.N., or accurately and
completely document any medical justification for not doing so.
42. Respondent did not provide justification in the medical record
for prescribing Xanax to M.N.
43. Respondent did not provide justification in the medical record
for prescribing oxycodone thirty (30) mg. to M.N.
FACTS SPECIFIC TO A.W.
44. From on or about June 20, 2008 through on or about October
28, 2008, A.W. presented to Respondent with pain shooting down the arms
and hands.
45. On or about June 20, 2008 Respondent prescribed thirty (30)
pills of Zoloft 50 mg., and one hundred fifty (150) pills of oxycodone 30
mg.
46. On or about June 27, 2008 Respondent prescribed sixty (60)
pills of Xanax 1 mg. and sixty (60) pills of Soma 350 mg.
47. On or about July 16, 2008 Respondent prescribed thirty (30)
pills of Zoloft 50 mg. and one hundred eighty (180) pills of oxycodone 30
mg.
48. On or about September 29, 2008, Respondent prescribed one
hundred eighty (180) pills of oxycodone 30 mg. and sixty (60) pills of Advil
400 mg.
49. On or about October 28, 2008 Respondent prescribed two
hundred (200) pills of oxycodone 30 mg. and sixty (60) pills of Advil 400
mg.
50. Respondent did not perform a urine screen during the time she
treated A.W. even though high dose opiates were prescribed.
51. Respondent did not provide justification in the medical records
for prescribing oxycodone 30mg as described in paragraphs forty five (45)
and forty seven (47) through forty nine (49).
52. Respondent did not provide justification in the medical records
for prescribing Xanax to A.W. as there is not an adequate discussion of
anxiety disorder in the record.
53. Respondent did not provide justification in the medical records
for prescribing Soma to A.W. as described in paragraph forty six (46).
COUNT ONE
54. Petitioner reincorporates and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through
fifty three (53) as if fully set forth herein.
95. Section 458.331(1)(nn), Florida Statutes (2007, 2008, 2009),
provides that violating any provision of Chapters 456 or 458, Florida
Statutes, or any rules adopted pursuant thereto is grounds for discipline by
the Board of Medicine.
56. Rule 64B8-9.013(3), Florida Administrative Code
(2007,2008,2009) provides as follows: The Board has adopted the
following standards for the use of controlled substances for pain control:
a) Evaluation of the Patient. A complete medical history and
physical examination must be conducted and documented in the
medical record. The medical record should document the nature and
intensity of the pain, current and past treatments for pain, underlying
or coexisting diseases or conditions, the effect of the pain on physical
and psychological function, and history of substance abuse. The
medical record also should document the presence of one or more
recognized medical indications for the use of a controlled substance.
b) Treatment Plan. The written treatment plan should state
objectives that will be used to determine treatment success, such as
pain relief and improved physical and psychosocial function, and
should indicate if any further diagnostic evaluations or other
treatments are planned. After treatment begins, the physician should
adjust drug therapy to the individual medical needs of each patient.
Other treatment modalities or a rehabilitation program may be
necessary depending on the etiology of the pain and the extent to
which the pain is associated with physical and psychosocial
impairment.
c) Informed Consent and Agreement for Treatment. The
physician should discuss the risks and benefits of the use of
controlled substances with the patient, persons designated by the
patient, or with the patient’s surrogate or guardian if the patient is
incompetent. The patient should receive prescriptions from one
physician and one pharmacy where possible. If the patient is
determined to be at high risk for medication abuse or have a history
of substance abuse, the physician should employ the use of a written
agreement between physician and patient outlining patient
responsibilities, including, but not limited to:
1. —_Urine/serum medication levels screening when
requested;
2. Number and frequency of all prescription refills; and
3. Reasons for which drug therapy may be
discontinued (i.e., violation of agreement).
d) Periodic Review. At reasonable intervals based on the
individual circumstances of the patient, the physician should review
the course of treatment and any new information about the etiology
of the pain. Continuation or modification of therapy should depend
on the physician’s evaluation of the patient's progress. If treatment
goals are not being achieved, despite medication adjustments, the
physician should reevaluate the appropriateness of continued
treatment. The physician should monitor patient compliance in
medication usage and related treatment plans.
€) Consultation. The physician should be willing to refer the
patient as necessary for additional evaluation and treatment in order
to achieve treatment objectives. Special attention should be given to
those pain patients who are at risk for misusing their medications and
those whose living arrangements pose a risk for medication misuse or
diversion. The management of pain in patients with a history of
substance abuse or with a comorbid psychiatric disorder requires
extra care, monitoring, and documentation, and may require
consultation with or referral to an expert in the management of such
patients.
f) Medical Records. The physician is required to keep
accurate and complete records to include, but not be limited to:
1,
The medical history and_ physical examination,
including history of drug abuse or dependence, as appropriate;
2. Diagnostic, therapeutic, and laboratory results;
3. Evaluations and consultations;
4. Treatment objectives;
5. Discussion of risks and benefits;
6. Treatments;
7. Medications (including date, type, dosage, and
quantity prescribed);
8. — Instructions and agreements; and
9. Periodic reviews.
Records must remain current and be maintained in an
accessible manner and readily available for review.
57. Respondent violated Rule 64B8-9.013(3), Florida Administrative
Code (2007, 2008, 2009) in one or more of the following ways:
a) _ by failing to conduct a complete medical history and
physical examination of R.S., D.H., M.N., or AW.;
b) by failing to explore other treatment modalities or
rehabilitation for R.S., D.H., M.N., or A.W.;
58. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section
458.331(1)(nn), Florida Statutes (2007, 2008, 2009), by violating Rule
64B8-9.013(3), Florida Administrative Code (2007, 2008, 2009).
COUNT TWO
59. Petitioner reincorporates and realleges paragraphs 1 through
fifty three (53) as if fully set forth herein.
60. Chapter 64B8-9.013(3), Florida Administrative Code (2007,
2008, 2009) as more particularly set forth in paragraph fifty six (56) is
adopted and re-alleged as if fully set forth herein.
61. Section 458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2007, 2008, 2009)
provides: failing to keep legible, as defined by department rule in
consultation with the board, medical records that identify the licensed
physician or the physician extender and supervising physician by name and
professional title who is or are responsible for rendering, ordering,
supervising, or billing for each diagnostic or treatment procedure and that
justify the course of treatment of the patient, including, but not limited to,
patient histories; examination results; test results; records of drugs
prescribed, dispensed, or administered; and reports of consultations and
hospitalizations and a violation thereof constitutes grounds for disciplinary
action by the Board.
62. Respondent failed to keep legible medical records justifying the
course of treatment for patients R.S., D.H., M.N., or A.W. in one or more of
the following ways:
a) _ by failing to keep medical records that justified the course
of treatment of R.S., by failing to record the justification for
prescribing Percocet as described in paragraph ten (10).
b) _ by failing to keep medical records that justified the course
of treatment of D.H., by failing to record the justification for
prescribing oxycodone thirty (30) mg. as described in paragraphs
twenty two and twenty three (23).
c) _ by failing to keep medical records that justified the course
of treatment of M.N., by failing to record the justification for
Prescribing Xanax or oxycodone thirty (30) mg. as described in
paragraphs thirty two (32) through thirty seven (37).
d) _ by failing to keep medical records that justified the course
of treatment of A.W., by failing to record the justification for
prescribing oxycodone thirty (30) mg., Xanax, or Soma as described
in paragraphs forty five (45) through forty nine (49) .
63. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2007, 2008,2009) by failing to keep
legible medical records that justify the course of treatment for patient R.S.
and/or patient D.H. and/or patient M.N. and/or patient A.W., including, but
not limited to patient histories, examination results; test results; records of
drugs prescribed, dispensed, or administered; and reports of consultations
and hospitalizations.
COUNT THREE
64. Petitioner reincorporates and realleges paragraphs 1 through
fifty three (53).
65. Section 458.331(1)(q), Florida Statutes (2007, 2008 2009),
subjects a licensee to discipline for prescribing controlled ‘substances
inappropriately or in excessive or inappropriate quantities.
66. Section 458.331(1)(q) states the following acts constitute
grounds for disciplinary action:
17
Prescribing, dispensing, administering, mixing, or
otherwise preparing a legend drug, including any controlled
substance, other than in the course of the physician’s
professional practice. For the Purposes of this paragraph, it
shall be legally presumed that prescribing, dispensing,
administering, mixing, or otherwise preparing legend drugs,
including alt controlled substances, inappropriately or in
excessive or inappropriate quantities is not in the best interest
of the patient and is not in the course of the physician's
professional practice, without regard to his or her intent.
67. Respondent prescribed controlled substances other than in the
course of her professional practice by prescribing controlled substances
inappropriately or excessively to R.S, D.H., M.N., or A.W in one or more of
the following ways:
a) _ by prescribing controlled substances without an adequate
medical assessment of R.S., D.H., M.N., or A.W.; .
b) _ by prescribing controlled substances without an adequate
physical examination of R.S., D.H., M.N., or A.W,
Cc) by prescribing controlled substances without ordering
| urine drug screening to R.S., D.H., M.N., or AW.;
d) by prescribing Xanax to M.N. or A.W. without an
adequate discussion of anxiety disorder.
68. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section
458.331(1)(q), Florida Statutes (2007, 2008, 2009).
COUNT FOUR
69. Petitioner reincorporates and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through
fifty three (53) as if fully set forth herein.
70. Chapter 64B8-9013(3), Florida Administrative Code, as more
particularly set forth in paragraph fifty six (56) herein is adopted and
realleged as if fully set forth herein.
71. Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2007, 2008, 2009),
subjects a licensee to discipline for committing medical malpractice as
defined in Section 456.50, Florida Statutes. Section 456.50, Florida
Statutes (2007, 2008, 2009) defines medical malpractice as the failure to
practice medicine in accordance with the level of care, skill, and treatment
recognized in general law related to health care licensure.
72. For purposes of Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, the
Board of Medicine shall give great weight to the Provisions of Section
766.102, Florida Statutes (2007, 2008, 2009) which provide that the
prevailing professional standard of care for a given health care provider
shall be that level of care, skill, and treatment which, in light of all relevant
surrounding circumstances, is recognized as acceptable and appropriate by
reasonably prudent similar health care providers.
73. Respondent failed to practice medicine with that level of care,
skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar
physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances
in treating R.S., D.H., M.N., or A.W. in one or more of the following ways:
a) by prescribing controlled substances inappropriately or in
excessive or inappropriate amounts to R.S., D.H., M.N., or A.W. ;
b) by failing to note in the medical records in prescribing
Xanax that M.N. or A.W. was suffering from an anxiety disorder;
C) by failing to order urine drug screening to R.S., D.H.,
M.N. or A.W. in light of the dosages of controlled substances
prescribed;
20
74.
d) by failing to show in the medical record the justification
for prescribing controlled substances to R.S., D.H., M.N., or A.W.,
€) by failing to perform a complete physical examination on
R.S., D.H., M.N., or A.W.,
f) by prescribing controlled substances to R.S, D.H., M.N., or
A.W., in quantities and dosages as previously outlined, without
justification.
g) by failing to perform a complete medical assessment of
R.S., D.H., M.N., or A.W,
Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section
458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2007, 2008, 2009).
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of
Medicine enter an order imposing one or more of the following penalties:
permanent revocation or suspension of Respondent's license, restriction of
practice, imposition of an administrative fine, issuance of a reprimand,
placement of the Respondent on probation, corrective action, refund of
fees billed or collected, remedial education and/or any other relief that the
Board deems appropriate.
SIGNED this_6‘* day of “Uw. , 2011,
FILED
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPUTY CLERK
CLERK Angel Sanders
pate JUN 07 2011
RJB/das
PCP Members: Mullins & Tucker
PCP: June 6, 2011
H. Frank Farmer, Jr., M.D., Ph.D.,
State Surgeon General
Department of Health
Robert J. Bobek
Assistant General Counsel
Florida Bar # 434337
DOH Prosecution Services Unit
4052 Bald Cypress Way-Bin C-65
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3265
(850) 245-4640 Office
(850) 245-4681 Facsimile
22
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Respondent has the right to request a hearing to be
conducted in accordance with Section 120.569 and 120.57,
Florida Statutes, to be represented by counsel or other qualified
representative, to present evidence and argument, to call and
cross-examine witnesses and to have subpoena and subpoena
duces tecum issued on his or his behalf if a hearing is requested.
NOTICE REGARDING ASSESSMENT OF COSTS
Respondent is placed on notice that Petitioner has incurred
costs related to the investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Pursuant to Section 456.072(4), Florida Statutes, the Board shall
assess costs related to the investigation and prosecution of a
disciplinary matter, which may include attorney hours and costs,
on the Respondent in addition to any other discipline imposed.
23
Docket for Case No: 11-004058PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Nov. 03, 2011 |
Motion to Re-open DOAH Case (DOAH CASE NO. 11-5691PL AND 11-5692PL ESTABLISHED).
|
Oct. 04, 2011 |
Order Relinquishing Jurisdiction and Closing Files. CASE CLOSED.
|
Oct. 04, 2011 |
CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held. |
Sep. 27, 2011 |
Motion for Denial of Postponement filed.
|
Sep. 27, 2011 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Sep. 08, 2011 |
Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum in Lieu of Live Testimony (Special Agent Beuth) filed.
|
Sep. 08, 2011 |
Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum in Lieu of Live Testimony (Detective Osterland) filed.
|
Sep. 08, 2011 |
Amended Notice of Taking Deposition (as to location only) filed.
|
Aug. 31, 2011 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (to J. Gillis, M.D.) filed.
|
Aug. 24, 2011 |
Notice of Serving Petititoner's First Request for Production, First Request for Interrogatories, and First Request for Admissions to Respondent filed.
|
Aug. 22, 2011 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 17 through 19, 2011; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Myers, FL).
|
Aug. 22, 2011 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Aug. 22, 2011 |
Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 11-4058PL and 11-4062PL).
|
Aug. 18, 2011 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Aug. 12, 2011 |
Initial Order.
|
Aug. 12, 2011 |
Notice of Co-Counsel (Shirley Bates) filed.
|
Aug. 12, 2011 |
Notice of Appearance (Robert Bobek) filed.
|
Aug. 11, 2011 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Aug. 11, 2011 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Aug. 11, 2011 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|