Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN
Respondent: ALL ARCHITECTURE, INC., AND MAJED M. HAWARI
Judges: WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Feb. 02, 2012
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, March 29, 2012.
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2025
| rarer |
FILED |
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Deputy Agency Clerk
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULA
CLERK Evette Lawson-Proctor
Date 10/17/2011
File #
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE
AND INTERIOR DESIGN,
Petitioner,
VS. CASE NO,: 2010-053536
ALL ARCHITECTURE, INC.,
AND MAJED M. HAWARI,
Respondents.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Architecture and Interior
Design against ALL ARCHITECTURE, INC. and MAJED M. HAWARI, (“Respondents”), and
says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of architecture
and interior design pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 481,
Florida Statutes.
2. The Department of Business and Professional Regulation has jurisdiction over the
unlicensed practice of architecture and interior design pursuant to Section 455.228(1), and
Section 481.223(1)(a), Florida Statutes.
3. Respondents’ last known address is 2103 West Columbus Drive, Tampa, Florida
33607.
4, At all times material hereto, Respondents were not duly registered or certified to
engage in the practice of architecture pursuant to Chapter 481, Florida Statutes.
Filed February 2, 2012 4:08 PM Division of Administrative Hearings
5. Respondents entered into a contract with Daniel E. Wahba, to provide
architectural drawings for a project located at 1908 Land O” Lakes Blvd., Lutz, Florida.
6. The contract specifically states that Respondents will provide architectural
drawings.
7. The Respondent is doing business as “All Architecture, Inc.”
8. Respondents are not licensed to practice architecture in the State of Florida and
therefore cannot offer or provide architectural services for a commercial property.
COUNT 1
9. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through eight (8)
as if fully set forth herein.
10. Section 481.223(1)(a), Florida Statutes, states that a person may not knowingly
“practice architecture unless the person is an architect or a registered architect.”
ll. Based upon the foregoing, Respondents have violated Section 481.223(1)(a),
Florida Statutes, by practicing architecture when they were not the holder of a valid license by
offering architectural services.
COUNT I
12,
Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through eight (8)
as if fully set forth herein.
13, Section 481.223(1)(c), Florida Statutes, states that a person may not knowingly “use
the name or title ‘architect’ or ‘registered architect’ or words to that effect, when the person is
not then the holder of a valid license.”
14, Based upon the foregoing, the Respondents have violated Section 481.223(1)(c),
Florida Statutes, by using the name or title “architect”, when they were not the holder of a valid
license.
COUNT III
15. Petitioner hereby rea!leges and incorporates paragrap
as if fully set forth herein.
16. Section 481.219(2), Florida Statutes, requires a certi
corporation, partnership, or fictitious name offering architectural serv
s one (1) through cight (8)
ficate of authorization for a
ices.
en All A an,
t All Arc
hitecture, Inc., has violated
Section 481.219(2), Florida Statutes, by offering architectural services without a certificate of
authorization.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board enter an Order imposing an
administrative fine not to exceed $5,000 per count, assess costs associated with investigation and
prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2), Florida Statutes,
and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuan
Florida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder.
Signed this g4*" dayof_ Octebe—
t to Chapters 481 and 455,
» 2011.
“S524
. .
we
DAVID K. MINACCI
Smith, Thompson, Shaw,
Minacci & Colon, P.A.
3520 Thomasville Road, Fourth Floor
Tallahassee, Florida 32309
FL Bar No. 0056774
Ph: (850) 402-1570
Fax: (850) 241
PCP: October 12, 2011
Rodriguez
Wirtz
Hall
-0161
Docket for Case No: 12-000485
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Mar. 29, 2012 |
Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
|
Mar. 29, 2012 |
Motion to Dismiss Formal Hearing filed.
|
Mar. 08, 2012 |
Order Granting Motion to Amend Petition.
|
Feb. 23, 2012 |
Motion to Amend Petition for Formal Hearing and Evidentiary Hearing filed.
|
Feb. 23, 2012 |
Respondents' Notice of Service of Answers to Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories filed.
|
Feb. 23, 2012 |
Response to Petitioner's First Request for Production filed.
|
Feb. 21, 2012 |
Response to Petitioner's First Request for Admissions filed.
|
Feb. 16, 2012 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Feb. 16, 2012 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for April 11, 2012; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Feb. 07, 2012 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Feb. 03, 2012 |
Initial Order.
|
Feb. 02, 2012 |
Referral Letter filed.
|
Feb. 02, 2012 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Feb. 02, 2012 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|