Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN vs ALL ARCHITECTURE, INC., AND MAJED M. HAWARI, 12-000485 (2012)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 12-000485 Visitors: 6
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN
Respondent: ALL ARCHITECTURE, INC., AND MAJED M. HAWARI
Judges: WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Feb. 02, 2012
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, March 29, 2012.

Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2024
| rarer | FILED | Department of Business and Professional Regulation Deputy Agency Clerk STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULA CLERK Evette Lawson-Proctor Date 10/17/2011 File # DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN, Petitioner, VS. CASE NO,: 2010-053536 ALL ARCHITECTURE, INC., AND MAJED M. HAWARI, Respondents. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Architecture and Interior Design against ALL ARCHITECTURE, INC. and MAJED M. HAWARI, (“Respondents”), and says: 1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of architecture and interior design pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 481, Florida Statutes. 2. The Department of Business and Professional Regulation has jurisdiction over the unlicensed practice of architecture and interior design pursuant to Section 455.228(1), and Section 481.223(1)(a), Florida Statutes. 3. Respondents’ last known address is 2103 West Columbus Drive, Tampa, Florida 33607. 4, At all times material hereto, Respondents were not duly registered or certified to engage in the practice of architecture pursuant to Chapter 481, Florida Statutes. Filed February 2, 2012 4:08 PM Division of Administrative Hearings 5. Respondents entered into a contract with Daniel E. Wahba, to provide architectural drawings for a project located at 1908 Land O” Lakes Blvd., Lutz, Florida. 6. The contract specifically states that Respondents will provide architectural drawings. 7. The Respondent is doing business as “All Architecture, Inc.” 8. Respondents are not licensed to practice architecture in the State of Florida and therefore cannot offer or provide architectural services for a commercial property. COUNT 1 9. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through eight (8) as if fully set forth herein. 10. Section 481.223(1)(a), Florida Statutes, states that a person may not knowingly “practice architecture unless the person is an architect or a registered architect.” ll. Based upon the foregoing, Respondents have violated Section 481.223(1)(a), Florida Statutes, by practicing architecture when they were not the holder of a valid license by offering architectural services. COUNT I 12, Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through eight (8) as if fully set forth herein. 13, Section 481.223(1)(c), Florida Statutes, states that a person may not knowingly “use the name or title ‘architect’ or ‘registered architect’ or words to that effect, when the person is not then the holder of a valid license.” 14, Based upon the foregoing, the Respondents have violated Section 481.223(1)(c), Florida Statutes, by using the name or title “architect”, when they were not the holder of a valid license. COUNT III 15. Petitioner hereby rea!leges and incorporates paragrap as if fully set forth herein. 16. Section 481.219(2), Florida Statutes, requires a certi corporation, partnership, or fictitious name offering architectural serv s one (1) through cight (8) ficate of authorization for a ices. en All A an, t All Arc hitecture, Inc., has violated Section 481.219(2), Florida Statutes, by offering architectural services without a certificate of authorization. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board enter an Order imposing an administrative fine not to exceed $5,000 per count, assess costs associated with investigation and prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2), Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuan Florida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder. Signed this g4*" dayof_ Octebe— t to Chapters 481 and 455, » 2011. “S524 . . we DAVID K. MINACCI Smith, Thompson, Shaw, Minacci & Colon, P.A. 3520 Thomasville Road, Fourth Floor Tallahassee, Florida 32309 FL Bar No. 0056774 Ph: (850) 402-1570 Fax: (850) 241 PCP: October 12, 2011 Rodriguez Wirtz Hall -0161

Docket for Case No: 12-000485
Issue Date Proceedings
Mar. 29, 2012 Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
Mar. 29, 2012 Motion to Dismiss Formal Hearing filed.
Mar. 08, 2012 Order Granting Motion to Amend Petition.
Feb. 23, 2012 Motion to Amend Petition for Formal Hearing and Evidentiary Hearing filed.
Feb. 23, 2012 Respondents' Notice of Service of Answers to Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories filed.
Feb. 23, 2012 Response to Petitioner's First Request for Production filed.
Feb. 21, 2012 Response to Petitioner's First Request for Admissions filed.
Feb. 16, 2012 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Feb. 16, 2012 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for April 11, 2012; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa and Tallahassee, FL).
Feb. 07, 2012 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Feb. 03, 2012 Initial Order.
Feb. 02, 2012 Referral Letter filed.
Feb. 02, 2012 Election of Rights filed.
Feb. 02, 2012 Administrative Complaint filed.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer