Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DENISE STRICKLAND vs EVE MANAGEMENT, INC., KA AND KM DEVELOPMENT, 14-001935 (2014)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 14-001935 Visitors: 13
Petitioner: DENISE STRICKLAND
Respondent: EVE MANAGEMENT, INC., KA AND KM DEVELOPMENT
Judges: SUZANNE VAN WYK
Agency: Commissions
Locations: Taft, Florida
Filed: Apr. 28, 2014
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, January 12, 2015.

Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2015
Summary: Whether Respondent, Eve Management, Inc./KA and KM Development, Inc., denied Petitioner full and equal enjoyment of the goods and services offered at its place of public accommodation, in violation of sections 509.092 and 760.08, Florida Statutes.1/Petitioner demonstrated that Respondent discriminated against her in the provision of a public accommodation in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1992.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


DENISE STRICKLAND,


Petitioner, FCHR Case No. 2014-00197


v. No. 14-1935


EVE MANAGEMENT, INC., KA AND K M DEVELOPMENT,

FCHR Order No. 15-017


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER AWARDING AFFIRMATIV E

RELIE F AN UNLAWFUL PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS PRACTIC E


This matter is before the Commission for consideration of the Order Closing File, dated January 12, 2015, issued in the above-styled case by Administrative Law Judge Suzanne Van Wyk.


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner Denise Strickland filed a complaint of discrimination pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Sections 509.092 and 760.01 - Florida Statutes

alleging that Respondent Eve Management, Inc., KA and K M Development, committed an unlawful public accommodations practice on the basis of Petitioner's race (African American) by cancelling Petitioner's reservation and not allowing Petitioner and her family to check-in to its resort hotel.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on April 1,

the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful public accommodations practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held via telephone conference at sites in Tallahassee, Florida, and St. Louis, Missouri, on June before Administrative Law Judge Suzanne Van Wyk.

Judge Van Wyk issued a Recommended Order, dated June 24, recommending that the Commission find that an unlawful public accommodations practice occurred and recommending affirmative relief.

On August the Commission issued an "Interlocutory Order Awarding Affirmative Relief from an Unlawful Public Accommodations Practice and Remanding Case to Administrative Law Judge for Issuance of Recommended Order Regarding Amounts Owed Petitioner" (FCHR Order No. 14-030).


Filed March 27, 2015 8:00 AM Division of Administrative Hearings



2014.

In response, Judge Van Wyk issued the Order Declining Remand, dated October 2,


On December 5, the Commission issued an "Order Remanding Case to

Administrative Law Judge for Clarification of Order Declining Remand" (FCHR Order No. 14-050).

Addressing the concerns set out in the Commission's December 5, 2014, Order (FCHR Order No. Judge Van Wyk issued an Order Accepting Remand, In Part, and Clarifying Order Declining Remand, dated December an Order on Remand, dated January 7, 2015, and an Order Closing File, dated January 12, 2015.

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Order Closing File.


Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law


We note that the Commission remanded the case to the Administrative Law Judge, and subsequently asked for clarification of the Administrative Law Judge's declining that remand, over concern that the issue of "quantifiable damages" owed Petitioner was not considered at the final hearing before the Administrative Law Judge (there is no transcript of the final hearing in the record), and over concern that the Notices of Hearing issued in this matter and the Recommended Order were sent to Respondent's attorney at an address utilizing an incorrect suite number.

The Administrative Law Judge addressed both of these issues in the Order Accepting Remand, In Part, and Clarifying Order Declining Remand, dated December

the Order on Remand, dated January 7, and the Order Closing File, dated January 12,

With regard to the issue of "quantifiable damages," in the Order Accepting Remand, In Part, and Clarifying Order Declining Remand, dated December the Administrative Law Judge amended the Order Declining Remand, dated October 2,

by striking paragraphs 2, 3, 4, and 5, and in their place adding the following single paragraph: "The undersigned finds that Petitioner had a full and fair hearing to establish quantifiable damages, i f any, to be awarded under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, for the discriminatory actions of Respondent. Petitioner offered no evidence of quantifiable damages."

With regard to the Notices of Hearing and Recommended Order being sent to Respondent's attorney at an address utilizing an incorrect suite number, the Administrative Law Judge issued an "Order to Show Cause" to Respondent, dated December requesting Respondent to show cause why the Recommended Order should not stand. In the Order on Remand, dated January 7, the Administrative Law Judge notes that Respondent had not made any filing in response to the Order to Show Cause, and orders that the "Recommended Order entered on June 24, stands as entered without amendment thereto."


We adopt the Administrative Law Judge's findings and conclusions related to these two issues.


Exceptions


Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Order Closing File.


Affirmative Relief


As stated in FCHR Order No. 14-030, and restated herein, through our adoption of the Administrative Law Judge's findings of fact and conclusions of law, as set out in the Recommended Order, dated June 24, we that unlawful discrimination occurred in this matter in the manner found by the Administrative Law Judge and have adopted the Administrative Law Judge's recommendations for the remedy of the discrimination.

As stated in FCHR Order No. and restated herein, Respondent Eve Management, Inc. / KA and K M Development is hereby ORDERED to cease and desist from discriminating further in the manner it has been found to have unlawfully discriminated against Petitioner.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure


DONE AND ORDERED of ,

FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:


Commissioner Michael Keller, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Rebecca Steele; and

Commissioner Billy Whitefox Stall


Filed day of in Tallahassee, Florida.

2015,


Commission on Human Relations 4075 Esplanade Way, Room Tallahassee, FL 32399

(850) 488-7082


Copies furnished to:


Denise Strickland

The Crossings Drive 0'Fallon,MO 63366


Eve Management, Inc., KA and K M Development c/o Chirag B. Kabrawala, Esq.

Baker & Hostetler, LLP SunTrust Center, Suite 200 South Orange Avenue

FL 32801


Suzanne Van Wyk, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this day of ffifau/-^


Clerk of the

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 14-001935
Issue Date Proceedings
Mar. 27, 2015 Agency Final Order Awarding Affirmative Relief from an Unlawful Public Accommodations Practice filed.
Jan. 12, 2015 Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
Jan. 07, 2015 Order on Remand.
Dec. 16, 2014 Order Accepting Remand, in Part, and Clarifying Order Declining Remand.
Dec. 16, 2014 Order to Show Cause.
Dec. 10, 2014 Agency Final Order Remanding Case to Administrative Law Judge for Clarification or Order Declining Remand filed.
Oct. 02, 2014 Order Declining Remand.
Aug. 29, 2014 Agency Interlocutory Order Awarding Affirmative Relief from Unlawful Public Accommodations Practices and Remanding Cases to Administrative Law Judge for Issuance of Recommendd Order Regarding Amounts Owed Petitioners filed.
Jun. 24, 2014 Recommended Order (hearing held June 13, 2014). CASE CLOSED.
Jun. 24, 2014 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jun. 23, 2014 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jun. 18, 2014 Statement of Person Administering Oath filed.
Jun. 16, 2014 Order on Post-Hearing Submissions.
Jun. 13, 2014 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Jun. 10, 2014 CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to June 13, 2014; 09:30 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL.
Jun. 10, 2014 Court Reporter Notice filed.
Jun. 10, 2014 Order Re-scheduling Hearing by Telephone (hearing set for June 13, 2014; 9:30 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
May 15, 2014 Court Reporter Notice filed.
May 14, 2014 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
May 14, 2014 Notice of Telephonic Final Hearing (hearing set for June 10, 2014; 9:30 a.m.).
Apr. 29, 2014 Initial Order.
Apr. 28, 2014 Public Accommodation Complaint of Discrimination - Amended filed.
Apr. 28, 2014 Notice of Determination: Cause filed.
Apr. 28, 2014 Determination: Cause filed.
Apr. 28, 2014 Petition for Relief filed.
Apr. 28, 2014 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.

Orders for Case No: 14-001935
Issue Date Document Summary
Mar. 26, 2015 Agency Final Order
Dec. 09, 2014 Agency Final Order
Aug. 21, 2014 Agency Final Order
Jun. 24, 2014 Recommended Order Petitioner demonstrated that Respondent discriminated against her in the provision of a public accommodation in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1992.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer