Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING
Respondent: CATHERINE COLE-RIVERA
Judges: J. LAWRENCE JOHNSTON
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Oct. 21, 2014
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, January 12, 2015.
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2024
FILED
Department of Bisiness anti Professional Regulation
Deputy Agency Clerk
STATE OF FLORIDA CLERK Evette Lawson-Proctor
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION pate 9/24/2014
DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING Filet
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS &
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION
OF PARI-~MUTUEL WAGERING,
Petitioner, Cask Nos. 2013-011417
2013-044695
Vv. 2014-015443
CATHERINE COLE~RIVERA,
Respondent,
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
The Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Di-
vision of Pari-Mutuel Wagering (Petitioner) , files this
Administrative Complaint against Catherine Cole-Rivera (Respond-
ent), and alleges as follows:
1. The Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulat-~-
ing pari-mutuel wagering pursuant to Chapter 550, Florida
Statutes.
2. At all times material hereto Respondent held a pari-
mutuel wagering trainer/thoroughbred license, number 1182264-
1021, issued by the Division.
3. At all times material hereto, Respondent trained and
raced thoroughbred horses at the Gulfstream Park, Calder Race
Course, and Tropical Park at Calder Race Course facilities.
4, Gulfstream Park, Calder Race Course, and Tropical Park
at Calder Race Course are facilities operated by a permitholder
authorized to conduct pari-mutuel wagering in this state under
Chapter 550, Florida Statutes.
COUNT ONE
(2013-011417)
5. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates herein, as
if fully set forth, paragraphs one through four of this adminis-
trative complaint.
6. At all times material hereto, Respondent was the train-
er/owner of “THE SENSE ANGEL.”
7. On or about February 13, 2013, “THE SENSE ANGEL” was en-
tered in the first race held at Gulfstream Park.
8. “THE SENSE ANGEL” finished first place in the first race
at Gulfstream Park on February 13, 2013.
9. On February 13, 2013, a Division of Pari-Mutuel Wager-
ing employee took sample number 786033 from “THE SENSE ANGEL,”
and the sample was processed in accordance with established pro-
cedures and forwarded to the University of Florida Racing
Laboratory (“the lab”) for analysis.
10. The lab tested sample number 786033, and found that it
contained Phenylbutazone, an anti-inflammatory and class 4 drug.
These results were issued to Petitioner in a report dated March
15, 2013.
|
}
|
i
;
11. Section 550.2415(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2012),
states, “[t]he finding of a prohibited substance in a race-day
specimen constitutes prima facie evidence that the substance was
administered and was carried in the body of the animal while
participating in the race.”
12, Rule 61D-6.002(1), Florida Administrative Code (2012),
provides, "{t]Jhe trainer of record shall be responsible for and
be the absolute insurer of the condition of the horses... he/she
enters to race."
13. Pursuant to section 550.2415(1) (a), Florida Statutes
(2012), "[t]he racing of an animal with any drug, medication,
stimulant, depressant, hypnotic, local anesthetic, or drug-
masking agent is prohibited. It is a violation of this section
for a person to administer or cause to be administered any drug,
|
{
|
|
i
|
|
medication, stimulant, depressant, hypnotic, narcotic, local an-
esthetic, or drug-masking agent to an animal which will result
in a positive test for such substance based on samples taken
from the animal immediately prior to or immediately after the
racing of that animal."
14. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section
550.2415(1) (a), Florida Statutes (2012).
COUNT_TWO
(2013-044695)
is. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates herein,
as if fully set forth, paragraphs one through four of this ad-
ministrative complaint.
16. At all times material hereto, Respondent was the
trainer of “PURE TREASURE.”
17, On or about October 4, 2013, “PURE TREASURE” was en-
tered in the seventh race held at Tropical Park at Calder Race
Course.
18. “PURE TREASURE” finished second place in the seventh
race at Tropical Park at Calder Race Course on October 4, 2013.
19. On October 4, 2013, a Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
employee took sample number 787031 from “PURE TREASURE” and the
sample was processed in accordance with established procedures
and forwarded to the University of Florida Racing Laboratory
(“the lab”) for analysis.
20. The lab tested sample number 787031, and found that it
contained Strychnine, a central nervous system stimulant and
Class 1 drug. These results were issued to the Petitioner ina
report dated October 30, 2013.
21. Section 550.2415(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2013),
states, “{t]he finding of a prohibited substance in a race-day
specimen constitutes prima facie evidence that the substance was
|
|
|
|
|
administered and was carried in the body of the animal while
participating in the race.”
22. Rule 61D-6.002(1), Florida Administrative Code (2013),
provides, "[t]he trainer of record shall be responsible for and
be the absolute insurer of the condition of the horses... he/she
enters to race."
23. Pursuant to section 550.2415(1) (a), Florida Statutes
(2013), "[t]he racing of an animal with any drug, medication,
stimulant, depressant, hypnotic, local anesthetic, or drug-
masking agent is prohibited. It is a violation of this section
for a person to administer or cause to be administered any drug,
medication, stimulant, depressant, hypnotic, narcotic, local an-
esthetic, or drug-masking agent to an animal which will result
in a positive test for such substance based on samples taken
t
|
|
|
|
|
|
from the animal immediately prior to or immediately after the
racing of that animal."
24. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section
550.2415(1) (a), Florida Statutes (2013).
COUNT THREE
(2014-015443)
25. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates herein,
as if fully set forth, paragraphs one through four of this ad-
ministrative complaint.
26. At all times material hereto, Respondent was the
trainer of “GOLDEN EMPRESS.”
27. On or about March 22, 2014, “GOLDEN EMPRESS” was en-
tered in the eighth race held at Calder Race Course.
28. “GOLDEN EMPRESS” finished first place in the eighth
race at Calder Race Course on March 22, 2014.
29. On March 22, 2014, a Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
employee took sample number 794504 from “GOLDEN EMPRESS” and the
sample was processed in accordance with established procedures
and forwarded to the University of Florida Racing Laboratory
("the lab”) for analysis.
30. The lab tested sample number 794504, and found that it
contained Phenylbutazone, an anti-inflammatory and class 4 drug.
|
|
|
These results were issued to the Petitioner in a report dated
April 08, 2014.
31. Section 550.2415(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2013),
states, “[t]he finding of a prohibited substance in a race-day
specimen constitutes prima facie evidence that the substance was
administered and was carried in the body of the animal while
participating in the race.”
32. Rule 61D-6.002(1), Florida Administrative Code (2013),
provides, *[t]he trainer of record shall be responsible for and
be the absolute insurer of the condition of the horses he/she
enters to race,"
33. Pursuant to section 550.2415(1) (a), Florida Statutes
(2013), "[t]he racing of an animal with any drug, medication,
stimulant, depressant, hypnotic, local anesthetic, or drug-
masking agent is prohibited. It is a violation of this section
for a person to administer or cause to be administered any drug,
medication, stimulant, depressant, hypnotic, narcotic, local an-
esthetic, or drug-masking agent to an animal which will result
in a positive test for such substance based on samples taken
from the animal immediately prior to or immediately after the
racing of that animal."
34. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section
550.2415(1) (a), Florida Statutes (2013).
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Division of
Pari-Mutuel Wagering enter an Order imposing one or more of the
following penalties against the Respondent as specified in Rule
61D-6.011, Florida Administrative Code and section
550.2415(3) (a), Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that
the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering is authorized to impose
pursuant to Chapter 550, Florida Statutes, and/or the rules
promulgated thereunder.
{Signatures appear on the following page.]
;
|
|
i
|
|
Signed this 23rd day of September, 2014.
KEN LAWSON, Secretary
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
By: Lo
Chief Attorney
ision of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
Florida Bar No. 91833
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
1940 N. Monroe Street, Ste. 40
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2202
(850) 488-0062 Telephone
(850) 921-1311 Facsimile
Chief Attorney
Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
Florida Bar No. 0083617
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
1940 N. Monroe Street, Ste. 40
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2202
(850) 488-0062 Telephone
(850) 921-1311 Facsimile
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Please be advised that within twenty-one (21) days of your
receipt of this administrative complaint you have the right to
request an administrative hearing. Any such hearing would be
conducted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 120.569
and 120.57, Florida Statutes, and you would have the right to be
represented by counsel or other qualified representative, to
call and examine witnesses, and to have subpoenas issued on your
behalf. However, if you do not file (i.e., we do not receive)
your request for hearing within the twenty-one (21) days, you
will have waived your right to any hearing.
Please also be advised that mediation is not available in
this matter.
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
ELECTION OF RIGHTS
DBPR v. CATHERINE COLE-RIVERA . Case Nos, 2013-011417, 2013-044695, 2014-015443
PLEASE CHECK ONLY ONE OF THE THREE OPTIONS,
Option (1) ["] I do dispute the allegations of material fact in the Administrative Complaint. This is a petition for a hearing involving
disputed material facts pursuant to section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, (“formal hearing”) before an Administrative Law Judge of the
Division of Administrative Hearings. I specifically dispute the following material facts alleged in the Administrative Complaint
(attach extra pages or write on the back if needed):
In addition to the above election for formal hearing, if you wish to enter into settlement negotiations, check the box below:
[7] Section 120.569(2)(a), Florida Statutes, requires the Department to send this case to the Division of Administrative Hearings
(DOAH) for a formal hearing within 15 days after receiving your Election of Rights. I am interested in settling this case and waive the
15-day requirement in order to enter into settlement negotiations with the Department.
Option (2) [] I do not dispute the allegations of material fact in the Administrative Complaint. I wish to submit oral and written
evidence in mitigation at a hearing pursuant to section 120,57(2), Florida Statutes (“informal hearing”) and that this oral and written
evidence be considered before any penalty and fines are imposed.
Option (3) [] I do not dispute the allegations of material fact in the Administrative Complaint and waive my right to any form of
hearing. I request that a Final Order imposing a penalty and fines be entered in this case.
MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED,
Name (Signature)
Mailing Address (if different) Name (Printed)
City State Zip Street Address
City State Zip
STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent's daytime phone number
COUNTY OF
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 2014, by. :
personally known ta me or who has produced as identification.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
{Notary Seal)
Updated 6/23/2014
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
EXPLANATION OF THE ELECTION OF RIGHTS
Please read the Administrative Complaint before choosing one of the three options, The Election of Rights is a
legally binding document. Consult an attorney if you do not understand your options.
You can only select ONE of the options numbered (1), (2) and (3) on the Election of Rights form. You must
sign the form. The form must be received by the Department at the address at the bottom of the form within 21
days after the date you receive the complaint. .
The three options are:
1. Check option (1) if you do dispute any material fact alleged in the Administrative Complaint. This is
considered a petition for an evidentiary administrative hearing (“formal hearing”) pursuant to sections
120.569(2)(a) and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, and requires the Department to send this case to the Division of
Administrative Hearings (DOAH) within 15 days of your completed petition requesting a formal hearing. This
election is made by checking the box marked (1) on the Election of Rights. Pursuant to Rule 28-106.201,
F.A.C., you must also state which material fact(s) alleged in the Administrative Complaint you dispute. Use the
space provided on the form and attach additional pages or use the back of the form if needed.
After electing option (1) explained above and regardless of whether you dispute any material fact
alleged in the Administrative Complaint, you may also request the opportunity to discuss settlement of
the case pursuant to section 120,57(4), Florida Statutes.
2. Check option (2) if you do not dispute any material fact alleged in the Administrative Complaint. You will
be given a hearing pursuant to section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes (“informal hearing”) and have the opportunity
to present written and oral evidence in mitigation at the informal hearing.
3. Check option (3) if you do not dispute any material fact and waive your right to any form of hearing, This
means that the Department will recommend a penalty on the charges set forth in the Administrative Complaint
without input from you.
If the Department does not receive your Election of Rights within 21 days after you receive the Administrative
Complaint, this will be considered a waiver of your right to elect any form of hearing and a Final Order may be
entered against you imposing a penalty and fines.
You must let the Department know if your mailing address changes.
THE ELECTION OF RIGHTS FORM AND ANY ATTACHMENTS SHOULD BE RECEIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT
WITHIN 21 DAYS AND MAILED TO;
C. Tomoka Brady, AAI
Office of the General Counsel
Northwood Centre
1940 North Monroe Street, Suite 40
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202
Updated 6/23/2014
|
|
|
Docket for Case No: 14-004974PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Jan. 12, 2015 |
Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
|
Jan. 12, 2015 |
Petitioner's Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Dec. 10, 2014 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for January 30, 2015; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
|
Dec. 10, 2014 |
(Petitioner's) Motion to Continue filed.
|
Oct. 27, 2014 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Oct. 27, 2014 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for December 30, 2014; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
|
Oct. 27, 2014 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Oct. 24, 2014 |
Notice of Appearance (Marisa Button) filed.
|
Oct. 22, 2014 |
Notice and Certificate of Service of Petitioner's First Interlocking Discovery filed.
|
Oct. 22, 2014 |
Initial Order.
|
Oct. 21, 2014 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Oct. 21, 2014 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Oct. 21, 2014 |
Agency referral filed.
|