Petitioner: PAM STEWART, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
Respondent: CHARNETTA STARR
Judges: J. LAWRENCE JOHNSTON
Agency: Department of Education
Locations: Orlando, Florida
Filed: Jul. 13, 2015
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, July 15, 2015.
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
EDUCATION PRACTICES COMMISSION
PAM STEWART, as
Commissioner of Education,
Petitioner,
vs. CASE NO. 134-1791
CHARNETTA STAR,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, Pam Stewart, as Commissioner of Education, files this Administrative
Complaint against CHARNETTA STAR. The Petitioner seeks the appropriate disciplinary
sanction of the Respondent’s educator's certificate pursuant to Sections 1012.315, 1012.795, and
1012.796, Florida Statutes, and pursuant to Rule 6A-10.081, Florida Administrative Code,
Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida, said sanctions
specifically set forth in Sections 1012.795(1) and 1012.796(7), Florida Statutes.
The Petitioner alleges:
JURISDICTION
1. The Respondent holds Florida Educator’s Certificate 984953, covering the areas
of Educational Leadership, Journalism, Pre-Kindergarten/Primary Education and Reading, which
is valid through June 30, 2018.
2. Ai all times pertinent hereto, the Respondent was employed as a Reading Teacher
at Oak Ridge High School in the Orange County School District.
MATERIAL ALLEGATIONS
3. During the 2012/2013 school year, Respondent was enrolled in an English for
Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) course in order to obtain an endorsement required for her
continued employment as a Reading teacher. Introductory information provided to participants,
in bolded type, informed participants that all assignments must be the work of the individual.
Assignments submitted for the course by Respondent were identical to assignments subsequently
submitted by another teacher who took the same course at a Jater date. Respondent failed to
abide by the requirements of the course in that materials submitted by Respondent for credit
CHARNETTA STARR
Administrative Complaint
Page 2 of 3
were either the work of another teacher, a prohibited corroboration with another teacher or
materials created by Respondent and provided to another teacher for course credit.
The Petitioner charges:
STATUTE VIOLATIONS
COUNT 1: The Respondent is in violation of Section 1012.795(1)q), Florida Statutes,
in that Respondent has violated the Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education
Profession prescribed by State Board of Education rules. ;
RULE VIOLATIONS
COUNT 2: The allegations of misconduct set forth herein are in violation of Rule 6A-
10.081(4)(b), Florida Administrative Code, in that Respondent has intentionally distorted or
misrepresented facts concerning an educational matter in direct or indirect public expression.
COUNT 3: The allegations of misconduct set forth herein are in violation of Rule 6A-
10.081(5)(a), Florida Administrative Code, in that Respondent has failed to maintain honesty in
all professional dealings.
(SIGNATURE ON FOLLOWING PAGE)
CHARNETTA STARR
Administrative Complaint
Page 3 of 3
WHEREFORE, based on the reasons set forth herein and in accordance with the
Explanation of Rights and Election of Rights forms attached to and made a part of this
Administrative Complaint, Petitioner respectfully recommends that the Education Practices
Commission impose an appropriate sanction against the Respondent’s educator’s certificate
pursuant to the authority provided in Sections 1012.795(1) and 1012.796(7), Florida Statutes,
The sanctions imposed by the Education Practices Commission may include, but are not limited
to, any one or a combination of the following: issuing the Respondent a written reprimand;
placing the Respondent on probation for any period of time; restricting the Respondent’s
authorized scope of practice; assessing the Respondent an administrative fine; directing the
Respondent to enroll in the Recovery Network Program; suspending the Respondent’s educator’s
certificate for a period of time not to exceed five years; revoking the Respondent’s educator’s
certificate for a period of time up to 10 years or permanently; determining the Respondent to be
ineligible for certification; or barring the Respondent from reapplying for an educator's
certificate for a period of time up to 10 years or permanently.
EXECUTED on this [sts day of Apri! » 2015,
gb)
PAM STEWART, as
Comunissioner of Education
State of Florida
Docket for Case No: 15-003878PL