Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE
Respondent: VIDYA SAGAR RAO MORISETTY, M.D.
Judges: E. GARY EARLY
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Sep. 12, 2016
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, September 15, 2016.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
Petitioner,
Vv. DOH Case No. 2015-30459
VIDYA SAGAR RAO MORISETTY, M.D.,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, the Florida Department of Health (hereinafter “Petitioner”),
files this Administrative Complaint before the Florida Board of Medicine
(hereinafter the “Florida Board”) against Respondent, Vidya Sagar Rao
Morisetty, M.D. (hereinafter “Respondent”), and in support thereof alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the
practice of medicine pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida Statutes, and
Chapters 456 and 458, Florida Statutes.
2. Atall times material hereto, Respondent was a licensed physician
within the state of Florida, having been issued license number ME 77390.
3. Respondent's address of record is 195 Raptor Court, Forsyth,
Illinois 62535.
4. Atall times material hereto, Respondent was a licensed physician
within the state of Illinois, having been issued license number 036-084779.
5. _ The licensing authority regulating the practice of medicine in the
state of Illinois is the Division of Professional Regulation, located within the
Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (hereinafter the
“Illinois Department’).
6. Onor about October 23, 2015, the Illinois Department approved
a Consent Order agreed to by Respondent in the case styled and numbered
Department of Financial and Professional Regulation v. Vidya Sagar Rao
Morisetty, Case Number 2014-0985 (hereinafter the “disciplinary
proceeding”).
7. The Consent Order was agreed to by Respondent in order to
resolve the disciplinary proceeding.
8. | The Consent Order reprimanded Respondent's license to practice
medicine in the state of Illinois.
9. The Consent Order constitutes action by the Illinois Department
against Respondent's license or authority to practice medicine in the state of
Illinois.
DOH v. Vidya Sagar Rao Morisetty, M.D., DOH Case Number 2015-30459
Administrative Complaint 2
10. Section 458.331(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2015), subjects a
licensee to discipline for having a license or the authority to practice medicine
revoked, suspended, or otherwise acted against, including the denial of
licensure, by the licensing authority of any jurisdiction, including its agencies
or subdivisions. The licensing authority's acceptance of a physician's
relinquishment of a license, stipulation, consent order, or other settlement,
offered in response to or in anticipation of the filing of administrative charges
against the physician's license, shall be construed as action against the
physician's license.
11. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
458.331(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2015), by having his Illinois medical license
acted against by the licensing authority of the state of Illinois,
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Florida Board enter
an order imposing one or more of the following penalties: permanent
revocation or suspension of Respondent's license, restriction of practice,
imposition of an administrative fine, issuance of a reprimand, placement of
Respondent on probation, corrective action, refund of fees billed or collected,
remedial education, and/or any other relief the Florida Board deems
appropriate.
DOH v. Vidya Sagar Rao Morisetty, M.D., DOH Case Number 2015-30459
Administrative Complaint 3
SIGNED this fifteenth day of July, 2016.
Celeste Philip, M.D., M.P.H.
Surgeon General and Secretary
Geoffrey M. Christian, Esq.
Assistant General Counsel
Florida Bar No. 0010325
Department of Health
FILED Prosecution Services Unit
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C-65
DEPUTY CLERK Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3265
Telephone (850) 245-4640, ext. 4661
ania Facsimile (850) 245-4684
- 7- |x /@ E-mail Geoffrey.Christian@flhealth.gov
Attorney for Petitioner
PCP: July 15, 2016
PCP Members: G. El-Bahri, M.D.; S. Rosenberg, M.D., Mr. Nicholas Romanello
DOH v. Vidya Sagar Rao Morisetty, M.D., DOH Case Number 2015-30459
Administrative Complaint 4
DOH V. VIDYA SAGAR RAO MORISETTY, M.D.
DOH CASE NUMBER 2015-30459
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Respondent has the right to request a hearing to be conducted
in accordance with Section 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes,
to be represented by counsel or other qualified representative, to
present evidence and argument, to call and cross-examine
witnesses and to have subpoena and subpoena duces tecum issued
on his or her behalf if a hearing is requested.
A request or petition for an administrative hearing must be in
writing and must be received by the Department of Health within
21 days from the day Respondent received this Administrative
Complaint, pursuant to Rule 28-106.111(2), Florida Administrative
Code. If Respondent fails to request a hearing within 21 days of
receipt of this Administrative Complaint, Respondent waives the
right to request a hearing on the facts alleged in this Administrative
Complaint pursuant to Rule 28-106.111(4), Florida Administrative
Code. Any request for an administrative proceeding to challenge
or contest the material facts or charges contained in this
Administrative Complaint must conform to Rule 28-106.2015(5),
Florida Administrative Code.
Mediation under Section 120.573, Florida Statutes, is not
available to resolve this Administrative Complaint.
NOTICE REGARDING ASSESSMENT OF COSTS
Respondent is placed on notice that Petitioner has incurred
costs related to the investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Pursuant to Section 456.072(4), Florida Statutes, the Board of
Medicine shall assess costs related to the investigation and
prosecution of a disciplinary matter, which may include attorney
hours and costs, on Respondent in addition to any other discipline
imposed.
DOH v. Vidya Sagar Rao Morlsetty, M.D., DOH Case Number 2015-30459
Administrative Complaint 5
Fe ee em
Docket for Case No: 16-005190PL