Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MYRON ROSNER vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, 17-000662 (2017)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 17-000662 Visitors: 16
Petitioner: MYRON ROSNER
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT
Judges: JUNE C. MCKINNEY
Agency: Department of Management Services
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Jan. 31, 2017
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, June 15, 2017.

Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2018
Summary: Whether Petitioner forfeits his rights to benefits under the Florida Retirement System.Respondent met its burden and proved Petitioner's rights and benefits should be forfeited under the Florida Retirement System.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


MYRON ROSNER,



vs.

Petitioner,


Case No. 17-0662


DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT,


Respondent.

/


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a final hearing was conducted in this case on May 3, 2017, by video teleconference at sites in Miami and Tallahassee, Florida, before Administrative Law Judge

June C. McKinney of the Division of Administrative Hearings.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Benedict P. Kuehne, Esquire

Law Office of Benedict P. Kuehne, P.A.

100 Southeast 2nd Street, Suite 3550 Miami, Florida 33131-2154


For Respondent: Thomas E. Wright, Esquire

Office of the General Counsel Department of Management Services 4050 Esplanade Way, Suite 160

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

Whether Petitioner forfeits his rights to benefits under the Florida Retirement System.


PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By letter dated April 20, 2016, Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement ("Division" or "Respondent"), notified Myron Rosner ("Rosner" or "Petitioner") that his rights and benefits under the Florida Retirement System were forfeited pursuant to section 112.3173(3), Florida Statutes, because Petitioner entered a guilty plea for one count of Unlawful Compensation or Reward for Official Behavior, a second degree felony in violation of section 838.016(2), Florida Statutes.

Petitioner filed a timely Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing contesting the notice. Subsequently, the case was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings ("DOAH"). Pursuant to notice, a final hearing proceeded as scheduled on May 3, 2017.

At the final hearing, Petitioner did not present any witnesses. Petitioner's Exhibits numbered 1 through 13 were admitted into evidence. Respondent presented the testimony of Allison Olson, benefits administrator for the Respondent.

Respondent's Exhibits numbered 1 through 5 were admitted into evidence.

The parties did not order a transcript of the hearing. The parties availed themselves of the right to submit proposed recommended orders 10 days after the final hearing. Both


parties filed timely proposed recommended orders, which have been considered in the preparation of this Recommended Order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. On May 5, 2011, Petitioner was mayor of North Miami Beach, Florida.

  2. During Petitioner’s employment as mayor with North Miami Beach, he was a member of the Florida Retirement System.

  3. On or about October 17, 2012, Petitioner was charged by Information with nine criminal counts in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida.

  4. On February 24, 2016, pursuant to a written Plea Agreement, Rosner entered a plea of guilty to Count 11/ Unlawful Compensation [or] Reward for Official Behavior, in violation of section 838.016(2), in Eleventh Circuit case F12023663.

  5. That same day in the Eleventh Circuit case F12023663, Judge Martin Bidwill issued the following orders: an Order Ratifying Terms of Plea Agreement; a Disposition Order specifying Rosner’s plea to Count 1 Unlawful Compensation [or] Reward for Official Behavior; and a Finding of Guilt Order to Count 1 Compensation [or] Reward for Official Behav[ior]/Influence.

  6. The October 17, 2012, Information detailed the factual basis of Rosner’s plea and conviction in Count 1.2/ Petitioner


    illegally received unpaid campaign advertising from Martin Outdoor Media, which had a continuing contract with the City of North Miami Beach while Petitioner served as mayor. Count 1 provides in relevant part, the following:

    COUNT 1


    MYRON JOEL ROSNER, on or about May 5, 2011, in the County and State aforesaid, being a public servant to wit: MAYOR OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH did unlawfully, feloniously, and corruptly request, solicit, accept, or agree to accept any pecuniary or other benefit not authorized by law, to wit; UNPAID CAMPAIGN ADS, for the past, future, or future exertion of any influence upon or with any other public servant regarding any act or omission which said public servant represented as being within the official discretion of a public servant, to wit: CONTINUE ALL MARTIN OUTDOOR MEDIA CONTRACTS WITH THE CITY OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH, in

    violation of s. 838.016(2), Fla. Stat., contrary to the form of the Statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Florida.3/

  7. Rosner was notified by certified letter dated April 20, 2016, of the Division's proposed action to forfeit his Florida Retirement System rights and benefits pursuant to sections 112.3173 and 121.091(5)(f). The notice provided the following basis for the proposed action:

    . . . . as a result of your guilty plea in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, for acts committed in connection with your employment with the City of North Miami Beach. Specifically, on or about October 18, 2012, in Case Number F12-023663


    (2012-CF_023663), you were charged by information, in relevant part, with unlawful compensation or award for official behavior, a second degree felony in violation of section 838.016(2), Florida Statutes, based on conduct which occurred on or about May 5, 2011. On or about February 24, 2016, you entered a guilty plea for one count of unlawful compensation or award for official behavior, a second degree felony in violation of section 838.016(2), Florida Statutes, and adjudication of guilt was withheld.


  8. By Petition dated May 9, 2016, Rosner contested the Notice and challenged the forfeiture.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  9. DOAH has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this proceeding pursuant to sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes (2016).4/

  10. The Florida Retirement System is governed by the provisions of Chapter 121, Florida Statutes.

  11. Respondent has the burden of proving by a preponderance of evidence that Petitioner has forfeited his Florida Retirement System benefits. Wilson v. Dep’t of Admin., Div. of Ret., 538 So. 2d 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

  12. The Florida Constitution sets forth ethical mandates to protect Floridians from any abuse of the trust placed in the public officers. Article II, Section 8(d) provides:

    Section 8. Ethics in government.—A public office is a public trust. The people shall


    have the right to secure and sustain that trust against abuse. To assure this right:


    * * *


    (d) Any public officer or employee who is convicted of a felony involving a breach of public trust shall be subject to forfeiture of rights and privileges under a public retirement system or pension plan in such manner as may be provided by law.


  13. Section 112.3173(3) provides in relevant part:


    (3) FORFEITURE.—Any public officer or employee who is convicted of a specified offense committed prior to retirement, or whose office or employment is terminated by reason of his or her admitted commission, aid, or abetment of a specified offense, shall forfeit all rights and benefits under any public retirement system of which he or she is a member, except for the return of his or her accumulated contributions as of the date of termination.


  14. Section 112.3173(2)(a) provides in relevant part:


    1. "Conviction" and "convicted" mean an adjudication of guilt by a court of competent jurisdiction; a plea of guilty or of nolo contendere; a jury verdict of guilty when adjudication of guilt is withheld and the accused is placed on probation; or a conviction by the Senate of an impeachable offense.


  15. Section 112.3173(2)(e) defines "specified offense" and provides in relevant part:

    1. "Specified offense" means:


      1. The committing, aiding, or abetting of an embezzlement of public funds;


      2. The committing, aiding, or abetting of any theft by a public officer or employee from his or her employer;


      3. Bribery in connection with the employment of a public officer or employee;


      4. Any felony specified in chapter 838, except ss. 838.15 and 838.16;


      5. The committing of an impeachable offense;


      6. The committing of any felony by a public officer or employee who, willfully and with intent to defraud the public or the public agency for which the public officer or employee acts or in which he or she is employed of the right to receive the faithful performance of his or her duty as a public officer or employee, realizes or obtains, or attempts to realize or obtain, a profit, gain, or advantage for himself or herself or for some other person through the use or attempted use of the power, rights, privileges, duties, or position of his or her public office or employment position.


  16. Similarly, section 121.091(5)(f) provides in relevant


    part:


    1. Any member who has been found guilty by a verdict of a jury, or by the court trying the case without a jury, of committing, aiding, or abetting any embezzlement or theft from his or her employer, bribery in connection with the employment, or other felony specified in chapter 838, except

    ss. 838.15 and 838.16, committed prior to retirement, or who has entered a plea of guilty or of nolo contendere to such crime, or any member whose employment is terminated by reason of the member’s admitted commitment, aiding, or abetting of an embezzlement or theft from his or her employer, bribery, or other felony specified


    in chapter 838, except ss. 838.15 and 838.16, shall forfeit all rights and benefits under this chapter, except the return of his or her accumulated contributions as of the date of termination.


  17. In this matter, Rosner pled guilty to a felony


Count 1 Unlawful Compensation [or] Reward for Official Behavior in violation of section 838.016(2) in the Eleventh Circuit case F12023663. Such a "plea of guilty" constitutes a conviction pursuant to section 112.3173(2)(a) and meets the criteria for a specified offense under section 112.3173(e)4.

Sections 112.3173 and 121.091(5)(f), both require forfeiture for Petitioner’s felony conviction of Unlawful Compensation [or] Reward for Official Behavior in violation of section 838.016(2). Therefore, Petitioner’s rights and benefits must be forfeited under the Florida Retirement System.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

RECOMMENDED that the Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement enter a final order finding that Petitioner was a public employee convicted of a specified offense committed prior to retirement pursuant to section 112.3173, Florida Statutes, and directing the forfeiture of his Florida Retirement System rights and benefits.


DONE AND ENTERED this 15th day of June, 2017, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

JUNE C. MCKINNEY

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 15th day of June, 2017.


ENDNOTES


1/ The undersigned rejects Petitioner’s assertion that no count in the Information was identified as a count to which Petitioner pled guilty. On the contrary, Respondent’s Exhibits 4, Disposition Order, and 5, Finding of Guilt Order, list "Count 1" clearly and match the plea agreement that identifies section 838.016(2) as the felony as well as the Information identifies 1 and also mirrors the statutory title Unlawful

Compensation or Reward for Official Behavior. Additionally, the same crime name is also recorded and identified on each of Respondent’s Exhibits except the Order Ratifying Terms of Plea Agreement.


2/ The undersigned rejects Petitioner’s contention that no factual basis was presented at hearing to support Petitioner’s plea. Although a plea colloquy transcript was not provided, the non-hearsay evidence of the certified copy of the Information detailed the factual basis for Count 1. Respondent’s Exhibit 4, Disposition Order, specified that Rosner pled guilty to Count 1 of the Information Unlawful Compensation [or] Reward for Official Behavior and the certified copy of the Finding of Guilt Order provided that the defendant "has been found guilty of the charge of Count 1 Crime Compensation [or] Reward for Official Behav[ior]. Since no testimony was presented to contradict such


evidence, the undersigned finds such evidence persuasive to provide the proof for the factual basis.


3/ Respondent’s Exhibit 1, the certified copy of the Information in the Eleventh Circuit case F12023663, detailed each of the nine counts Petitioner was originally charged with including Count 1 to which Petitioner entered a plea of guilty.


4/ All references are to Florida Statutes 2016 unless otherwise stated.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Benedict P. Kuehne, Esquire

Law Office of Benedict P. Kuehne, P.A.

100 Southeast 2nd Street, Suite 3550 Miami, Florida 33131-2154 (eServed)


Thomas E. Wright, Esquire Office of the General Counsel

Department of Management Services 4050 Esplanade Way, Suite 160

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950 (eServed)


Elizabeth Stevens, Director Division of Retirement Department of Management Services Post Office Box 9000

Tallahassee, Florida 32315-9000 (eServed)


J. Andrew Atkinson, General Counsel Office of the General Counsel Department of Management Services 4050 Esplanade Way, Suite 160 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950 (eServed)


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 17-000662
Issue Date Proceedings
Jun. 28, 2018 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Appellee's motion to dismiss appeal is granted.
Feb. 08, 2018 Agency Final Order filed.
Jun. 30, 2017 Petitioner's Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
Jun. 15, 2017 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jun. 15, 2017 Recommended Order (hearing held May 3, 2017). CASE CLOSED.
May 16, 2017 Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
May 15, 2017 Respondent's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
May 04, 2017 Petitioner's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
May 03, 2017 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Apr. 26, 2017 Joint Pre-hearing Stipulation filed.
Feb. 13, 2017 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Feb. 13, 2017 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for May 3, 2017; 9:30 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
Feb. 13, 2017 Respondent's Amended Response to Initial Order filed.
Feb. 13, 2017 Petitioner's Statement in Support of Recommended Hearing Dates filed.
Feb. 08, 2017 Joint Response to Initial order filed.
Feb. 01, 2017 Initial Order.
Jan. 31, 2017 Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
Jan. 31, 2017 Agency action letter filed.
Jan. 31, 2017 Respondent's Notice of Election to Request Assignment of Administrative Law Judge filed.

Orders for Case No: 17-000662
Issue Date Document Summary
Jan. 03, 2018 Agency Final Order
Jun. 15, 2017 Recommended Order Respondent met its burden and proved Petitioner's rights and benefits should be forfeited under the Florida Retirement System.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer