Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHARMACY
Respondent: RICHARD SPRYS, R.PH.
Judges: ELIZABETH W. MCARTHUR
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Longwood, Florida
Filed: Sep. 18, 2020
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, September 29, 2020.
Latest Update: Dec. 24, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
PETITIONER,
v. CASE NO. 2019-47599
RICHARD SPRYS, R.PH.,
RESPONDENT.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its
undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint before the
Board of Pharmacy (“Board”) against Respondent, Richard Sprys, R.Ph.,
and in support thereof alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the
practice of pharmacy pursuant to section 20.43, Florida Statutes; chapter
456, Florida Statutes; and chapter 465, Florida Statutes.
2. At all times material to this Administrative Complaint,
Respondent was a pharmacist within the state of Florida, having been
issued license number PS 15789.
3. | Respondent's address of record is 108 Wax Myrtle Lane,
Longwood, Florida 32779.
4. At all times material to this Administrative Complaint,
Respondent was the designated prescription department manager (“PDM”)
of record for Pharmacy 4 Less, LLC (“Permittee”), a permitted community
pharmacy in Altamonte Springs, Florida.
5. On or about September 6, 2019, the Department was notified
that the Permittee had ceased operations.
6. On one or more occasions between September 9, 2019, and
October 15, 2019, Department inspectors presented to the Permittee’s
location and confirmed that the Permittee had ceased operations.
7. The Permittee failed to perform one or more of the following on
or before the date of closure:
a. Return its community pharmacy permit to the Board;
b. Advise the Board which permittee was to receive its
prescription files;
c. Physically deliver its prescription files to a pharmacy
operating within reasonable proximity and within the same
locality; and/or
DOH v. Richard Sprys, R.Ph. 2
DOH Case No. 2019-47599
8.
d. Affix a prominent sign to the front entrance of the pharmacy
advising the public of the new location of the former
permittee’s prescription files or otherwise provide a means
by which to advise the public of the new location of their
prescription files.
The Permittee failed to provide the Board with one or more of
the following information prior to transferring ownership of its medicinal
drugs:
. The name, address, pharmacy permit number and Drug
Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) registration number of
the transferor pharmacy;
. The name, address, permit number, DEA registration
number, and authorized business activity of the transferee
entity;
. The date on which the transfer will occur; and/or
. A complete inventory of all medicinal drugs within the
provisions of section 893.03, Florida Statutes, as of the date
of transfer.
DOH v. Richard Sprys, R.Ph. 3
DOH Case No. 2019-47599
Count I
9. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs one through
seven as if fully set forth herein.
10. Section 456.072(1)(k), Florida Statutes (2018), provides that
failing to perform any statutory or legal obligation placed upon a licensee
constitutes grounds for disciplinary action.
11. Section 465.022(11)(a), Florida Statutes (2019), provides that
the prescription department manager must ensure the permittee’s
compliance with all rules adopted under chapters 465, 499, and 893,
Florida Statutes, as they relate to the practice of the profession of
pharmacy and the sale of prescription drugs.
12. Rule 64B16-28.202(3), Florida Administrative Code, provides
that prior to closure of a pharmacy the permittee shall: notify the Board of
Pharmacy in writing as to the effective date of closure, return the
pharmacy permit to the Board of Pharmacy office or arrange with the local
Bureau of Investigative Services of the Department to have the pharmacy
permit returned to the Board of Pharmacy, and advise the Board of
Pharmacy which permittee is to receive the prescription files.
DOH v. Richard Sprys, R.Ph. 4
DOH Case No. 2019-47599
13. Rule 64B16-28.202(4), Florida Administrative Code, provides
that on the date of closure of a pharmacy the former permittee shall:
physically deliver the prescription files to a pharmacy operating within
reasonable proximity of the pharmacy being closed and within the same
locality; and affix a prominent sign to the front entrance of the pharmacy
advising the public of the new location of the former permittee’s
prescription files or otherwise provide a means by which to advise the
public of the new location of their prescription files
14. As set forth above, the Permittee failed to perform one or more
required tasks on or before the date of closure.
15. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section
456.072(1)(k), through a violation of section 465.022(11)(a), by failing to
ensure the Permittee’s compliance with rule 64B16-28.202(3) and (4).
Count II
16. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs one through
six, and eight, as if fully set forth herein.
17. Section 456.072(1)(k), Florida Statutes (2019), provides that
failing to perform any statutory or legal obligation placed upon a licensee
constitutes grounds for disciplinary action.
DOH v. Richard Sprys, R.Ph. 5
DOH Case No. 2019-47599
18. Section 465.022(11)(a), Florida Statutes (2019), provides that
the prescription department manager must ensure the permittee’s
compliance with all rules adopted under chapters 465, 499, and 893,
Florida Statutes, as they relate to the practice of the profession of
pharmacy and the sale of prescription drugs.
19. Rule 64B16-28.203, Florida Administrative Code, provides, in
relevant part, that when ownership of medicinal drugs is transferred to a
new owner upon closure of a pharmacy, the transferor pharmacy shall
provide the Board of Pharmacy with the following information:
a. The name, address, pharmacy permit number and DEA
registration number of the transferor pharmacy;
b. The name, address, permit number, DEA registration number
(if available), and authorized business activity of the
transferee entity;
c. The date on which the transfer will occur; and
d. A complete inventory of all medicinal drugs within the
provisions of section 893.03, Florida Statutes, as of the date
of transfer.
DOH v. Richard Sprys, R.Ph. 6
DOH Case No. 2019-47599
20. As set forth above, the Permittee failed to provide the Board
with all required information prior to transferring ownership of its medicinal
drugs.
21. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section
456.072(1)(k), through a violation of section 465.022(11)(a), by failing to
ensure the Permittee’s compliance with rule 64B16-28.203.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]
DOH v. Richard Sprys, R.Ph. 7
DOH Case No. 2019-47599
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of
Pharmacy enter an order imposing one or more of the following penalties:
permanent revocation or suspension of Respondent’s license, restriction of
practice, imposition of an administrative fine, issuance of a reprimand,
placement of the Respondent on probation, corrective action, refund of
fees billed or collected, remedial education and/or any other relief that the
Board deems appropriate.
SIGNED this 23rd day of July, 2020.
Scott A. Rivkees, MD
State Surgeon General
FILED
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH By: /s/Andrew J. Pietrylo, Jr.
DEPUTY CLERK .
Andrew J. Pietrylo, Jr.
CLERK: Zacdper Chater Assistant General Counsel
DATE: July 23, 2020 FL DOH Prosecution Services Unit
4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C-65
Tallahassee, FL 32399-3265
Florida Bar Number 118851
(P) (850) 558-9905
(F) (850) 245-4662
(E) Andrew. Pietrylo@flhealth.gov
PCP Meeting: July 23, 2020
PCP Members: Weizer & Wright
DOH v. Richard Sprys, R.Ph. 8
DOH Case No. 2019-47599
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Respondent has the right to request a hearing to be
conducted in accordance with Section 120.569 and 120.57,
Florida Statutes, to be represented by counsel or other qualified
representative, to present evidence and argument, to call and
cross-examine witnesses and to have subpoena and subpoena
duces tecum issued on his or her behalf if a hearing is requested.
A request or petition for an administrative hearing must be
in writing and must be received by the Department within 21
days from the day Respondent received the Administrative
Complaint, pursuant to Rule 28-106.111(2), Florida
Administrative Code. If Respondent fails to request a hearing
within 21 days of receipt of this Administrative Complaint,
Respondent waives the right to request a hearing on the facts
alleged in this Administrative Complaint pursuant to Rule 28-
106.111(4), Florida Administrative Code. Any request for an
administrative proceeding to challenge or contest the material
facts or charges contained in the Administrative Complaint must
conform to Rule 28-106.2015(5), Florida Administrative Code.
Please note that mediation under Section 120.573, Florida
Statutes, is not available to resolve this Administrative Complaint.
NOTICE REGARDING ASSESSMENT OF COSTS
Respondent is placed on notice that Petitioner has incurred
costs related to the investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Pursuant to Section 456.072(4), Florida Statutes, the Board shall
assess costs related to the investigation and prosecution of a
disciplinary matter, which may include attorney hours and costs,
on the Respondent in addition to any other discipline imposed.
DOH v. Richard Sprys, R.Ph. 9
DOH Case No. 2019-47599
Docket for Case No: 20-004225PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Sep. 29, 2020 |
Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
|
Sep. 25, 2020 |
Amended Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Sep. 25, 2020 |
Joint Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Sep. 25, 2020 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Sep. 21, 2020 |
Notice of Appearance (Brandon Smoot) filed.
|
Sep. 21, 2020 |
Procedural Order.
|
Sep. 21, 2020 |
Initial Order.
|
Sep. 18, 2020 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Sep. 18, 2020 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Sep. 18, 2020 |
Agency referral filed.
|