Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: John F. Harrell and T. G. Futch, for Plaintiff in Error;
Marks, Marks Holt, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Oct. 20, 1926
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The defendant in error, as plaintiff in court below, sued the plaintiff in error, as defendant below, in an action at law upon a promissory note Several pleas were filed by defendant to the declaration to all of which demurrers were sustained and thereafter, by leave of the court, the defendant filed three "further and amended pleas." Demurrer was likewise sustained to each of these pleas and final judgment entered by the court. Writ of error is brought to this court from such final judgment and
Summary: The defendant in error, as plaintiff in court below, sued the plaintiff in error, as defendant below, in an action at law upon a promissory note Several pleas were filed by defendant to the declaration to all of which demurrers were sustained and thereafter, by leave of the court, the defendant filed three "further and amended pleas." Demurrer was likewise sustained to each of these pleas and final judgment entered by the court. Writ of error is brought to this court from such final judgment and ..
More
The record in this cause having been considered by this Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 837, Acts of 1919, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the court below should be, and the same is hereby, reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
BROWN, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, STRUM AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
