Fuller v. State, (1926)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 11
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Effie Knowles, for Plaintiff in Error;
J. B. Johnson, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Nov. 09, 1926
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Plaintiff in Error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted of murder in the second degree. On writ of error, the principal contention is the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the identity of the defendant as the perpetrator of the homicide. The evidence in this case is lengthy and in many essentials unique. The possibility of the occurrence of another case on substantially the same facts as are here involved is too remote to justify a review of the evidence. In considering this c
Summary: Plaintiff in Error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted of murder in the second degree. On writ of error, the principal contention is the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the identity of the defendant as the perpetrator of the homicide. The evidence in this case is lengthy and in many essentials unique. The possibility of the occurrence of another case on substantially the same facts as are here involved is too remote to justify a review of the evidence. In considering this ca..
More
I have discovered no error in the record; therefore I think the judgment should be affirmed.
Source: CourtListener
