Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Hampton, Bull Pencke and S. S. Sandford, for Appellant;
Harris Denning, for Appellees.
Filed: Aug. 02, 1926
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 448 On June 30, 1924, Lillian Mae Hay filed her bill of complaint in the court below, seeking to have Lyman A. Salisbury and Ruth F. Salisbury, *Page 449 his wife, specifically perform an alleged verbal agreement to convey certain lands described in the bill of complaint as follows, to-wit: Lot three (3) of W. S. Smith's Re-plat of Block five (5) of Lakeside
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 448 On June 30, 1924, Lillian Mae Hay filed her bill of complaint in the court below, seeking to have Lyman A. Salisbury and Ruth F. Salisbury, *Page 449 his wife, specifically perform an alleged verbal agreement to convey certain lands described in the bill of complaint as follows, to-wit: Lot three (3) of W. S. Smith's Re-plat of Block five (5) of Lakeside S..
More
The record in this cause having been considered by this Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 7837, Acts of 1919, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
BROWN, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
TERRELL, J., dissents.
