Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Chas. P. Dickinson, for Plaintiffs in Error;
Durrance Lemire, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Nov. 18, 1926
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This case is before us on writ of error from a judgment rendered for the plaintiff in the court below, in a suit wherein E. C. Langston was plaintiff and W. H. Rainey and J. N. Bradshaw were defendants. The suit was brought to recover a balance which the plaintiff alleged was due him from the defendants for the construction of certain roads through a sub-division in Orange County, Florida, more particularly described in the pleadings. The declaration sets forth the cause of action in five counts
Summary: This case is before us on writ of error from a judgment rendered for the plaintiff in the court below, in a suit wherein E. C. Langston was plaintiff and W. H. Rainey and J. N. Bradshaw were defendants. The suit was brought to recover a balance which the plaintiff alleged was due him from the defendants for the construction of certain roads through a sub-division in Orange County, Florida, more particularly described in the pleadings. The declaration sets forth the cause of action in five counts,..
More
The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 7837, Acts of 1919, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the court below should be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
BROWN, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
TERRELL, J., not participating.
