Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ricker v. Gulf Fertilizer Co., (1926)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 13
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: H. S. Glazier, for Plaintiff in Error; Hilton S. Hampton, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Feb. 02, 1926
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is her
More

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

*Page 251

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer