Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: E. W. R. C. Davis, for plaintiffs in Error;
W. B. Crawford and Alexander Akerman, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Jul. 08, 1926
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The defendant in error sued the plaintiffs in error in the Circuit Court of Orange County upon their supersedeas bond given in an appeal *Page 216 from a certain quo warranto proceedings in Orange County wherein a judgment of ouster had been rendered against the plaintiff in error Vestel and awarding the office of Chief of Police of the City of Orlando to the defendant in error Eagerton. There are several assignments of error but they may all be disposed of in the consideration of one question,
Summary: The defendant in error sued the plaintiffs in error in the Circuit Court of Orange County upon their supersedeas bond given in an appeal *Page 216 from a certain quo warranto proceedings in Orange County wherein a judgment of ouster had been rendered against the plaintiff in error Vestel and awarding the office of Chief of Police of the City of Orlando to the defendant in error Eagerton. There are several assignments of error but they may all be disposed of in the consideration of one question, t..
More
The record in this cause having been considered by this court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 7837, Acts of 1919, adopted by the court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause should be, and the same is hereby, reversed for the entry of a proper judgment for the amount of the salary, being four hundred and fifty dollars, and costs expended in the suit, being nine dollars and twenty cents, together with the costs in the present suit.
BROWN, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
