Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

E. O. Painter Fertilizer Co. v. Boyd, (1927)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 13
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Williams Bly and J. Turner Butler, for Plaintiff in Error; Geo. M. Powell, for Defendants in Error.
Filed: Mar. 01, 1927
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 356 In July, 1914, defendants in error brought suit against plaintiffs in error for damages in the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars, their declaration, which was filed in September of that year, containing two counts, the first of which was upon an alleged promise to pay plaintiffs on request the sum of Fifty-six Hundred Dollars for medical attendance, advice and
More

The record in this cause having been considered by this Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 7837, Acts of 1919, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that if the plaintiffs below shall within thirty days after the filing of the mandate in the lower court enter a remittitur of Two Thousand Dollars with interest thereon from July 1, 1913, the judgment of the Circuit Court will stand affirmed; failing to do this within thirty days after the mandate is filed, the said judgment will be reversed and a new trial granted.

ELLIS, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

STRUM, J., not participating.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer