Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Freed Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corporation, (1927)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 5
Judges: WHITFIELD, P. J. —
Attorneys: T. E. Price and Harold Kassewitz, for Appellants; Shipp, Evans Kline, for Appellee.
Filed: Apr. 15, 1927
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 890 The bill of complaint herein filed May 6, 1926, in the lower Court by appellants here, alleges in effect that complainants are the owners of Lot 6 of Block 112 of Ocean Beach, Addition No. Four, in Dade County, Florida; that the defendant corporation claims a leasehold interest in Lots 7 and 8, Block 112 of Ocean Beach, Addition No. Four; that defendant o
More

I am inclined to the opinion that complainant's riparian rights under the facts of this particular case, extended into the waters at right angles to the general trend of the shore line of his lot, and his right of view out across the waters likewise. We have held this right of view to be one of the most valuable of the rights of the riparian proprietor. See Thiesen case, Supra. I do not understand the foregoing opinion to conflict with this doctrine; but the conclusion reached is well grounded upon the principle of laches and estoppel, as shown by the facts of this case, clearly stated in the opinion, whatever the riparian rights of complainants may have been.

STRUM J., concurs. *Page 903

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer