Kramer v. Barnett, (1927)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: D.C. Campbell, for Appellants;
Milam, McIlvaine Milam, for Appellees.
Filed: Jul. 20, 1927
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This is an appeal from the order of the Chancellor sustaining exceptions to and striking the answer interposed to a bill to foreclose a mortgage. The order of the Chancellor should be sustained on authority of the opinion in the case of Wayne Realty and Investment Company v. Whitten et ux, 90 Fla. 433 , 106 So. 125 , and it is so ordered. Affirmed. WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur. *Page 298
This is an appeal from the order of the Chancellor sustaining exceptions to and striking the answer interposed to a bill to foreclose a mortgage.
The order of the Chancellor should be sustained on authority of the opinion in the case of Wayne Realty and Investment Company v. Whitten et ux, 90 Fla. 433, 106 So. 125, and it is so ordered.
Affirmed.
WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
Source: CourtListener
