Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Fariss v. Holly, (1928)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 5
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Giles F. Lewis, for Plaintiff in Error; DeCottes Spencer, for Defendants in Error.
Filed: Feb. 24, 1928
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This is an action of replevin to recover possession of an automobile. Upon a trial there was a verdict for plaintiffs and judgment thereon, adjudging that plaintiffs recover from defendant the automobile sued for, and from the sureties on a statutory forthcoming bond filed by defendant, the value of the automobile as found in the verdict of the jury. The date of the judgment is January 12, 1927. Thereafter, on February 4, 1927, upon motion presented on behalf of the sureties on the bond, the jud
More

The record in this cause having been considered by this Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 7837, Acts of 1919, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed.

ELLIS, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, TERRELL, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer