Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: R. P. Jones and E. M. Magaha, for Appellants;
W. W. Whitehurst and Kelly Kash, for Appellees.
Filed: May 04, 1928
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment *Page 864 to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereb
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment *Page 864 to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby..
More
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment
to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
