Powell v. Newman-Butler Co., (1928)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 1
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Mitchell D. Price and Robert J. Boone, for Plaintiff in Error.
Loftin, Stokes Calkins, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: May 04, 1928
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for *Page 862 the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the sa
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for *Page 862 the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the sam..
More
Whether the plaintiff had paid his occupation license is defensive matter. There is sufficient legal evidence of a promise by the defendant to support the verdict for the plaintiff.
Rehearing denied.
WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
Source: CourtListener
