Raulston v. Hortt, (1928)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 8
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: E. B. Donnell and Farrington Lockhart, for Plaintiffs in Error;
McCune, Casey, Hiaasen Fleming, for Defendants in Error.
Filed: Jul. 12, 1928
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby a..
More
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ELLIS, C. J., AND STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur.
Source: CourtListener
