Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Leitner Leitner, for Appellants;
Mabry, Reaves Carlton, for Appellee.
Filed: Mar. 14, 1928
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The designation adopted by counsel for the parties to the appeal by referring to the parties hereto as complainant and defendants, respectively, as in the court below, will be followed in this Court. It is alleged that Alfred Roe (the decedent) had owned certain real estate in his life time and conveyed the same to the defendant Charles A. Roe, taking back a series of promissory notes executed by Charles A. Roe to evidence the unpaid purchase price and a mortgage on the property to secure the pa
Summary: The designation adopted by counsel for the parties to the appeal by referring to the parties hereto as complainant and defendants, respectively, as in the court below, will be followed in this Court. It is alleged that Alfred Roe (the decedent) had owned certain real estate in his life time and conveyed the same to the defendant Charles A. Roe, taking back a series of promissory notes executed by Charles A. Roe to evidence the unpaid purchase price and a mortgage on the property to secure the pay..
More
The record in this cause having been considered by this Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 7837, Acts of 1919, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
ELLIS, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, TERRELL, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
