Randall v. Twitchell, (1929)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 8
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Selden, Hodgden Couchman, for Appellants;
Horn Ossinsky, for Appellee.
Filed: Oct. 03, 1929
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: A motion is made to quash the appeal upon the ground that it is frivolous and not taken in good faith, but for the purpose of delay. The suit was instituted for the purpose of foreclosing a real estate mortgage, the bill of complaint being in proper form. The appellants filed a joint and several answer denying the allegations setting up the indebtedness and the making and delivery of the note and mortgage. They specially "deny that the said mortgage was on the 1st day of July A.D. 1925 duly ackn
Summary: A motion is made to quash the appeal upon the ground that it is frivolous and not taken in good faith, but for the purpose of delay. The suit was instituted for the purpose of foreclosing a real estate mortgage, the bill of complaint being in proper form. The appellants filed a joint and several answer denying the allegations setting up the indebtedness and the making and delivery of the note and mortgage. They specially "deny that the said mortgage was on the 1st day of July A.D. 1925 duly ackno..
More
The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the motion to quash the appeal herein be and the same is hereby granted.
TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
Source: CourtListener
