Baker Et Ux. v. Rowe, (1930)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 7
Judges: BROWN, J. —
Attorneys: Eldridge Hart, for Appellants.
R. C. Horne, for Appellee.
Filed: Oct. 16, 1930
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court now being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said *Page 622 decrees of the circuit court be, and the same are
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court now being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said *Page 622 decrees of the circuit court be, and the same are h..
More
Rowe was not by the showing made in the bill holder of notes in due course, therefore he held them subject to equities set out in answer, which the court ignored in the decree. Also no proof that complainant agreed to pay Attorney's fees.
BUFORD, J., concurs.
Source: CourtListener
