Douglas v. Webber, (1930)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 26
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Martin Hocker, D. Neil Ferguson, and Anderson Anderson,
for Appellant;
Hampton Greene, for Appellee.
Filed: Apr. 08, 1930
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 757 The appeal herein is from the following decree of the Circuit Court: "Heretofore this Court entered an order awarding a temporary injunction restraining the holding of the election as called by the Board of County Commissioners under and pursuant to the terms of Chapter 14217. Thereafter, F. W. Ditto and certain other citizens undertook to intervene, and
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 757 The appeal herein is from the following decree of the Circuit Court: "Heretofore this Court entered an order awarding a temporary injunction restraining the holding of the election as called by the Board of County Commissioners under and pursuant to the terms of Chapter 14217. Thereafter, F. W. Ditto and certain other citizens undertook to intervene, and w..
More
I agreed with the opinion of Mr. Justice STRUM except that I think the record shows that neither the provisions of Sec. 3 of Art. III of the Constitution nor of Chapter 13791, Acts of 1929, were complied with in that the affidavit constituting proof of publication attached to the bill as introduced is not the same as the affidavit entered in the journal. This constitutes an additional reason why the decree appealed from should be affirmed.
Source: CourtListener
