Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Thos. W. Butler, for Appellants;
Waltmire Hughes, for Appellees.
Filed: May 21, 1930
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Foreclosure proceedings were brought by appellees as complainants below against appellants as defendants below. The three defendants were personally served, and entered their appearance but filed no other pleadings. Decree pro confesso was entered against A. P. Hatch and Arley M. Hatch, but not against Agnes C. Hatch, wife of A. P. Hatch. A final decree was rendered upon the report of the special master; the property was sold and an order duly entered confirming the sale. The defendants, in due
Summary: Foreclosure proceedings were brought by appellees as complainants below against appellants as defendants below. The three defendants were personally served, and entered their appearance but filed no other pleadings. Decree pro confesso was entered against A. P. Hatch and Arley M. Hatch, but not against Agnes C. Hatch, wife of A. P. Hatch. A final decree was rendered upon the report of the special master; the property was sold and an order duly entered confirming the sale. The defendants, in due c..
More
The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that this cause be and the same is hereby remanded with directions to the chancellor to modify the decree by eliminating that part of same allowing solicitor's fees, and upon the decree being so modified and entered, that the same stand affirmed, and that the costs of the appeal be taxed against the appellees.
TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
