Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Lucas Twomey, for Plaintiff in Error;
Stewart Presson, for Defendants in Error.
Filed: May 28, 1930
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In this case, the plaintiff in error instituted an action upon a promissory note, which is in words and figures as follows: "LaBelle, Fla., Dec. 30, 1926. "No. _ "Ninety days after date, without grace, we, for value received, jointly as principals promise to pay to Marshall Jackson Co. or order, at LaBelle, Florida, the sum of Two Thousand No/100 Dollars. "In Gold or its equivalent in lawful money of the United States with interest after date at the rate of 8 per cent. per annum until paid. And
Summary: In this case, the plaintiff in error instituted an action upon a promissory note, which is in words and figures as follows: "LaBelle, Fla., Dec. 30, 1926. "No. _ "Ninety days after date, without grace, we, for value received, jointly as principals promise to pay to Marshall Jackson Co. or order, at LaBelle, Florida, the sum of Two Thousand No/100 Dollars. "In Gold or its equivalent in lawful money of the United States with interest after date at the rate of 8 per cent. per annum until paid. And i..
More
The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the Court below should be, and the same is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings.
TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
