Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Palatka Abstract Title Co. v. Haskell, (1930)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 17
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: J. P. Lamb, for Plaintiff in Error. A. H. Odom, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Dec. 17, 1930
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The plaintiff, defendant in error here, instituted an action of replevin against the defendant for the recovery *Page 1505 of two abstract of title books and three oak chairs which were alleged to be detained by the defendant. Palatka Abstract and Title Company, who claimed title thereto as purchaser from the Palatka Bank Trust Company as Trustee. The plaintiff was president of Putnam County Abstract Company, a corporation, and as such president negotiated a sale of certain property owned by it,
More

The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged by *Page 1509 the Court that the judgment of the Court below be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer