Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: George G. Herring, for Appellant;
Wilson Boyle, for appellee.
Filed: Oct. 29, 1930
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Appellee who was complainant below, filed his bill in every respect similar to that in Stuart v. Stephanus, 94 Fla. 1087 , 114 So. R. 767. The bill set up claim of title in fee simple in complaint to eleven parcels of land in Seminole County, under ten described tax deeds of record, issued by the State as grantor to complainant as grantee. Decree was entered, quieting title in the complainant to all lands described in the bill, and thereafter on petition of Anna L. Tangeman, a defendant named in
Summary: Appellee who was complainant below, filed his bill in every respect similar to that in Stuart v. Stephanus, 94 Fla. 1087 , 114 So. R. 767. The bill set up claim of title in fee simple in complaint to eleven parcels of land in Seminole County, under ten described tax deeds of record, issued by the State as grantor to complainant as grantee. Decree was entered, quieting title in the complainant to all lands described in the bill, and thereafter on petition of Anna L. Tangeman, a defendant named in ..
More
The bill is without equity, makes no case against anyone, sets up no cloud on the title. The suit is merely an effort to declare a tax deed valid.
BUFORD, J., concurs.
