Turner v. State, (1930)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 18
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: R. A. Johnson, for Plaintiff in Error;
Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Feb. 03, 1930
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The plaintiffs in error were convicted in the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County of breaking and entering *Page 248 a dwelling place with intent to steal personal property of the value of over fifty dollars. The case is here for review upon writ of error. The first assignment of error presented is based upon the court's denial of the motion for new trial. It is alleged that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict in that there was no proof that the defendants forcibly entered th
Summary: The plaintiffs in error were convicted in the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County of breaking and entering *Page 248 a dwelling place with intent to steal personal property of the value of over fifty dollars. The case is here for review upon writ of error. The first assignment of error presented is based upon the court's denial of the motion for new trial. It is alleged that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict in that there was no proof that the defendants forcibly entered the..
More
The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the Court below be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
ELLIS, J., dissents.
Source: CourtListener
