Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Blocker v. Blocker, (1931)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 8
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: J. U. Bethell and Thos. A. Cunniff, for Appellants; John C. Blocker, Jr., for Appellee.
Filed: Oct. 27, 1931
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The complainant in the court below (appellee here) filed her bill of complaint for the partition of certain real estate that belonged to her late husband, John C. Blocker. She claimed an interest therein under the last will and testament of the deceased, except as to the homestead, and as to the homestead she elected to take a child's part in lieu of dower. Testator was also survived by his son, John C. Blocker, Jr., a daughter, Marguerite Blocker Holmes, and three grandchildren, namely, Samuel
More

The record of this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929 (Ex. Sess.) adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the decree of the court below be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur. *Page 295

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer