Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Creel Et Ux. v. Abernethy, (1931)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 10
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Zewadski Pierce, for Appellants; Don Register, for Appellee.
Filed: Jul. 11, 1931
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The transcript of the record in this case has no index attached thereto, as is required by the Rules. The assignments of error present only the question of the correctness of the findings and decree of the chancellor based on question of fact. There appears in the record substantial evidence to support the decree appealed from and, therefore, such decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered. Affirmed. BUFORD, C.J., AND ELLIS AND BROWN, J.J., concur.

The transcript of the record in this case has no index attached thereto, as is required by the Rules.

The assignments of error present only the question of the correctness of the findings and decree of the chancellor based on question of fact.

There appears in the record substantial evidence to support the decree appealed from and, therefore, such decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., AND ELLIS AND BROWN, J.J., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer