Harbeson Lbr. Co. v. Anderson, (1931)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 19
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: E. C. Maxwell, for Plaintiff in Error;
S. K. Gillis, for Defendants in Error.
Filed: Aug. 06, 1931
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The defendants in error, hereinafter called the plaintiffs, who were father and sister respectively of one Walter Anderson, deceased, brought an action at law against the plaintiff in error to recover damages for the death of the said Walter Anderson. The defendant was engaged in the saw mill business and *Page 733 operated a log road in connection with its mill. In its logging operations it was necessary from time to time to lay and pick up the track over which its log trains ran. In laying its
Summary: The defendants in error, hereinafter called the plaintiffs, who were father and sister respectively of one Walter Anderson, deceased, brought an action at law against the plaintiff in error to recover damages for the death of the said Walter Anderson. The defendant was engaged in the saw mill business and *Page 733 operated a log road in connection with its mill. In its logging operations it was necessary from time to time to lay and pick up the track over which its log trains ran. In laying its ..
More
I am inclined to think there was sufficient evidence as to the negligence charged to sustain the verdict, but that the amount of the verdict was excessive for the reasons stated in the opinion.
Source: CourtListener
