Kline v. the Eugene Berninghaus Co., (1931)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 17
Judges: BUFORD, C.J. —
Attorneys: Snedigar Baya, for Plaintiff in Error;
Shutts Bowen, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Jul. 07, 1931
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The defendant in error was plaintiff in the court below and sued the plaintiff in error, defendant in court below, to enforce payment of three promissory notes dated February 8, 1926, the first note being for $2580.31 due 30 days after date; the second note was for $2580.30 due 60 days after date and the third note was for $2580.30 due 90 days after date. The defendant filed six pleas, all of which were demurred to and the demurrer sustained. The 1st, 2d 3rd and 6th pleas attempted to set up a t
Summary: The defendant in error was plaintiff in the court below and sued the plaintiff in error, defendant in court below, to enforce payment of three promissory notes dated February 8, 1926, the first note being for $2580.31 due 30 days after date; the second note was for $2580.30 due 60 days after date and the third note was for $2580.30 due 90 days after date. The defendant filed six pleas, all of which were demurred to and the demurrer sustained. The 1st, 2d 3rd and 6th pleas attempted to set up a to..
More
I am inclined to the opinion that amended pleas 3 and 4 presented a good defense.
Source: CourtListener
